Rating of Russian cities in terms of living standards. From the Volga to the Yenisei: a barometer of living standards in the regions of the Russian Federation Rating of Russian regions by living standards

In the course of developing a strategy at the stages of diagnostics and goal-setting, it is very important to understand the position of the strategized object relative to competitors and to be able to set goals in terms of maintaining or strengthening their positions. This requires regular ratings.
One of such ratings - RCI, will be constantly updated by the partner of the RCSP, AV Group.

In addition, on this page of the site will be placed and other ratings, conducted by state and independent organizations. Including episodic ones made by individual researchers and published in scientific literature.

Read more in the notes of the Deputy Director of the RCSP A.R. Batchaeva:

How to use ratings in planning

Rating of investment attractiveness of Russian regions (developed by Expert RA rating agency).
Rating of the socio-economic situation of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation (developed by the rating agency "RIA Rating").
Rating of Russian regions in terms of quality of life (developed by the rating agency "RIA Rating").
Credit rating of the regions of the Russian Federation (developed by the rating agency "RIA Rating").
Rating of innovative regions of Russia (developed by the Association of Innovative Regions of Russia).
Rating of innovative development of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation (developed by the Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge, National Research University Higher School of Economics).
Rating of regional readiness for the future (developed by the Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge, National Research University Higher School of Economics).
Energy efficiency rating of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation (developed by the Ministry of Energy of Russia in conjunction with the information group "Interfax").
National rating of the investment climate in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation (developed by the Agency for Strategic Initiatives).
National tourist rating (developed by the Center for Information Communications "Rating" in conjunction with the magazine "Rest in Russia").
National rating of governors (developed by the Center for Information Communications "Rating").
Environmental rating of Russian regions (developed by the All-Russian public organization "Green Patrol").
Management efficiency rating in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation (developed by the Agency for Political and Economic Communications and the Political Research Laboratory of the Higher School of Economics).
Rating of Russian regions by the level of development of team sports (developed by the Petersburg Politics Foundation and the sports publication Sport-Express).
Rating (ranking) of regions by the share of the population provided with drinking water that meets safety requirements (developed by the Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare (Rospotrebnadzor).
Rating of regions of the Russian Federation in terms of environmental and energy efficiency of business (developed by the Environmental and Energy Rating Agency "Interfax-ERA").
Regional Competitiveness Index AV RCI - growth poles in Russia (developed by the consulting company AV Group (AV Group).
Rating of regions according to the index of socio-economic and political tension (developed by the Committee for Civil Initiatives).
Rating of investment attractiveness of industrial parks and special economic zones (developed by the Expert Analytical Center).

Ranking cities based on the "rank vector of dynamics" in the period 2002-2011.
The ranking is the result of a scientific study conducted by Professor B.S. Zhikharevich and associate professor O.V. Rusetskaya (ICSER Leontief Center). In the course of the study, fluctuations in the dynamics of socio-economic development of 120 large Russian cities (including 77 administrative centers of the regions) were assessed. We used 9 indicators, the growth of values of which can be unambiguously interpreted as evidence of the positive development of the city. The rank vector of dynamics is a sequence of nine digits corresponding to the number of the rank group, which included the city in each of the periods under consideration (2003-2011). The following types of urban trajectories are identified: stably leading; consistently lagging behind; accelerated development; slowing down development; oscillating (with multidirectional dynamics).

Sustainable Urban Development Ranking in Russia 2014
The rating was prepared by the SGM rating agency, published in 2015. Compiled in accordance with the principles of sustainable development of the territory. It covers 173 cities of Russia, with a population of over 100 thousand people. As a methodological basis, the concept of a triune bottom line was used, which takes into account economic results, social and environmental components. To prepare a rating based on 32 indicators (open data of municipal statistics published by Rosstat), the index of sustainable urban development was calculated. Among the methodological approaches to calculating the rating, one can note the use of weight correction factors (determined by the method of expert assessments) and linear scaling (determining the position of a city among other cities with the assignment of a private index from 0 to 1).

The problem of improving the quality of life in the country as a whole and in the regions of Russia is the most important strategic task at the present stage of social development. To quantify the imbalances in this area, the RIA Rating agency of the Russia Segodnya media group prepared a rating of Russian regions in terms of quality of life for the Russian Investment Forum.

The rating was built on the basis of a comprehensive accounting of various indicators that record the actual state of certain aspects of living conditions and the situation in the socio-economic sphere. When calculating the rating, 72 indicators were analyzed, which are combined into 11 groups that characterize the main aspects of the quality of life in the region: the level of income of the population; employment of the population and the labor market; housing conditions of the population; security of residence; demographic situation; ecological and climatic conditions; public health and educational level; provision of social infrastructure facilities; level of economic development; the level of development of small business; development of the territory and development of transport infrastructure.

The positions of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in the final rating were determined on the basis of the integral rating score, which was calculated by aggregating the rating points of the regions of the Russian Federation for all analyzed groups. The group's rating score was determined by aggregating the rating points of the indicators included in the group.

Our main centers of attraction for the workforce: Moscow, St. Petersburg and the Moscow Region again became the leaders of the rating. These three have been at the top of the rating for many years, with high rating points that are not yet attainable for other regions. Most likely, this situation will not change in the coming years. Infrastructure development, a high level of economic and social development, coupled with a high potential for further development, allows these regions to gain a foothold in the top of the rating for a long time. The Republic of Tyva and the Republic of Ingushetia are at the bottom of the rating.

RIA Rating is a universal rating agency of the media group MIA "Russia Today", specializing in assessing the socio-economic situation of the regions of the Russian Federation, the economic condition of companies, banks, sectors of the economy, countries. The main directions of the agency's activities are: creating ratings of regions of the Russian Federation, banks, enterprises, municipalities, insurance companies, securities, and other economic objects; comprehensive economic research in the financial, corporate and public sectors.

MIA "Russia Today" - an international media group whose mission is to provide prompt, balanced and objective coverage of events in the world, informing the audience about different views on key events. RIA Rating as part of MIA Rossiya Segodnya is part of the agency's line of information resources, which also include:

The rating of regions 2020 is compiled on the basis of data from RIA "Rating". The rating of Russian regions in terms of living standards in 2020 is based on a complex of different factors that record certain aspects and events in different spheres of life.

Photo:

We have cities
Coast at home
the beauty regions
rating

Moscow is rightfully ranked first in the ranking of Russian regions in 2020. It is the largest city in our country. The standard of living here is much higher than in other regions. The main part of the economy is developing here, the largest companies are located. Moscow is the most important educational center of the Russian Federation. In terms of the standard of living of families, Moscow also occupies a leading position.

St. Petersburg is considered the cultural center of the Russian Federation. Most of the monuments that are included in the UNESCO World Heritage Site are located here. The second largest financial market is located in the cultural capital of Russia.

The Moscow region is at the 3rd place in the ranking of Russian regions in terms of living standards for 2020. There is a constant population growth, the region is famous for its industrial areas and large enterprises. A big plus for this area is that it borders on the capital. Thanks to Moscow, it is becoming even more attractive to migrants.

The Republic of Tatarstan is the leader in the ranking among the regions for the highest standard of living in Russia (Volga region) 2020. Oil is produced here, the educational and scientific level of Tatarstan also occupies high positions - it is considered the scientific center of Eastern Europe. Don't miss u.

Krasnodar Territory ranks 5th in the top five in the rating of Russian regions in 2020 - it is the third largest region in the Russian Federation. Tourism is very developed here. The Black Sea coast provides most of the region's infrastructure. Thanks to the seaport, there is access to the international foreign trade route.

Top 5 regions of the Russian Federation where investors want to invest

The Republic of Tatarstan is in the first place, has a good reputation, a very developed region. Foreign investors want to invest money here and get profit from it. Turkish and Korean investors have already outlined an action plan. Korea drew attention to the agricultural industry of Tatarstan and plans to increase the level of seafood on the market in the Russian Federation.
Kaluga Region was also included in the investment rating of Russian regions in 2020. The region is developing rapidly. Investors are attracted by the international airport "Kaluga", "Nairmedik Pharma", the opening of which took place quite recently. This region has a very good location, great resource potential. Kaluga has the best conditions for business and economy, comfortable living conditions.
The Belgorod Region occupies an honorable place in the rating of investment attractiveness of Russian regions in 2020 according to RBC. The region has favorable conditions for investment, it is a border area that reveals the potential for international relations. The social and cultural sphere is progressing, which attracts many businessmen.
The Tambov region is famous for its developed transport infrastructure. The territory has highly fertile chernozem soils that attract investors. Mineral and recreational resources are also at a high level, sand, phosphorus, sapropel are mined.
The Ulyanovsk Region closes the top five in the rating of investment attractiveness of Russian regions in 2020. The advantage of this region is the operation of modern and liberal investment legislation. Investors are attracted by the region's tax breaks. I invest in wholesale and retail trade, vehicles, agriculture. The aerospace industry is one of the top-priority areas of the Ulyanovsk region.

Top 5 heads of regions of the Russian Federation

Thanks to the information communications center, data on the rating of the heads of regions in Russia for 2020 was obtained. The main indications were taken according to the opinion of regional and federal experts:

Sobyanin Sergei Mikhailovich is the mayor of Moscow in the well-deserved first place. The center of the capital is the largest in terms of financial and international centers. The educational level of Moscow is at the highest level, the largest number of universities and medical institutions, which the mayor pays great attention to.
Kadyrov Ramzan Akhmatovich (Chechen Republic). The head of the region has gained a large percentage of popularity in recent years. The priority direction of its activity is the fight against terrorism. The republic is developing socially and economically - houses are being built, tourism is developing (mountaineering is especially developed).
Vorobiev Andrey Yurievich - Head of the Moscow Region. The large population of this area indicates a good geographical position. Foreigners constantly come here, industrial areas are developed. In the 2020 environmental rating for the regions of Russia, the Moscow region is far from leading, since there is a high level of pollution due to enterprises that emit household and industrial waste into the atmosphere. It is among the dirtiest regions of Russia.
Minnikhanov Rustam Nurgalievich - the head of Tatarstan. It is Tatarstan that ranks first in terms of the standard of living of the Volga region. Large oil fields, good geographical location, powerful scientific potential - all this allows the republic to develop in the right direction.
Poltavchenko Georgy Sergeevich - mayor of St. Petersburg. It is considered the historical center of the Russian Federation. The large number of population allows the city to be the first in terms of population. Currency exchanges are very developed. The mayor is boosting the city's economy.

Top 5 poorest regions of Russia

The city of Togliatti was recognized as the very first in the rating of the poor regions of Russia in 2020. The poverty index leads to the fact that young men are left without work and social problems arise. Despite the fact that the city is the center of the automotive industry, the standard of living there is very low. Many industrial enterprises do not work, and the cars that are produced there are not in demand in the car market.
The city of Astrakhan. There is a lack of funds here. The infrastructure has an uneven development: restaurants, hotels, offices have been built, but they do not provide enough profit for Astrakhan to develop in that direction.
Penza. Unemployment is the city's main problem. Enterprises work, but more in the region are engaged in private entrepreneurship. The level of salaries is very low, there is only enough to pay for utilities and food.
Volgograd. The well-being of the citizens of this city is poor. It is considered a tourist center, but in terms of income it falls short of the rating of the Russian regions in terms of quality of life in 2020. Almost half of the population is considered to be low-income.
The last city on the list is Saratov. Its disadvantages are the lack of modern medical centers, poor ecology, and a large mortality rate among the city's population. There are many landfills around the city that pollute the ecology of the city.

MIA "Russia Today" - an international media group, whose mission is to provide prompt, balanced and objective coverage of events in the world, informing the audience about different views on key events. RIA Rating as part of MIA Rossiya Segodnya is part of the agency's line of information resources, which also include: RIA News , R-Sport , RIA Real Estate , Prime , Inosmi... MIA Rossiya Segodnya is the leader in terms of citation among the Russian media and is increasing the citation of its brands abroad. The agency also holds a leading position in terms of citations in Russian social networks and the blogosphere.

MOSCOW, January 14 - PRIME. In the rating of regions in terms of quality of life - 2016, the first positions are still held by Moscow, St. Petersburg and the Moscow region. The Republic of Ingushetia and the Republic of Tyva are at the bottom of the rating. The position of the Republic of Crimea has improved most significantly.

The rating agency RIA "Rating" of the media group MIA "Russia Today" has prepared the next, sixth in a row, rating of the quality of life of the population in the Russian regions. The rating was built on the basis of a comprehensive accounting of various indicators that record the actual state of certain aspects of living conditions and the situation in the social sphere. Based on the 72 indicators taken into account, a rating score was calculated, which serves as an assessment of interregional differences and a criterion for ranking regions.

The ranking results indicate that the stabilization of the economic situation in 2017 had a favorable effect on the quality of life in most regions. The average rating score of all regions in the Rating of Regions by Quality of Life - 2017 was 45.12, which is 1.16 points more than in the Rating - 2016. In the previous year, the average rating score of all regions increased by only 0.35 points. The consolidated rating score increased in the 71st region, which is due to the improvement in the indicators taken into account when calculating the rating. At the same time, of the fourteen regions in which the aggregate rating score decreased, only five of the decrease exceeded 1 point.

According to the results of the rating, the first and last ten regions remained practically unchanged. At the same time, despite the relative stability of the distribution of regions at the poles of the rating, the positions of a number of regions in the middle of the list have changed significantly. The positions of 14 regions changed by more than five places, of which ten improved their positions and four worsened.

The first positions in the rating of regions in terms of the quality of life are still held by Moscow, St. Petersburg and the Moscow Region, whose aggregate rating score exceeds 70 (possible minimum - 1, possible maximum - 100). They are followed by the Republic of Tatarstan, Belgorod Region, Krasnodar Territory, Voronezh Region, Lipetsk Region, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug - Yugra and Kaliningrad Region. In the 2016 Ranking, most of these regions were also in the top ten. The only exception is the Kaliningrad Region, which was ranked 11th in the previous rating, and in 2017 it moved up one position and took 10th place. Tyumen Oblast left the top ten, which is in 13th place in the current rating. At the same time, the value of the consolidated rating score of the Tyumen region in the Rating - 2017 increased by 0.68 points, thus, the decrease in its position in the rating is largely due not to the deterioration of indicators, but to the fact that in a number of other regions the indicators have improved more significantly.

The composition of the last top ten has not changed compared to the previous year. At the same time, in five regions from the last ten, the value of the consolidated rating score increased, which indicates an improvement in most of the indicators taken into account when calculating the rating. Among the regions out of the top ten, the consolidated rating score increased for the Republic of Kalmykia, the Republic of Tyva, the Jewish Autonomous Region, the Kurgan Region and the Republic of Buryatia. Nevertheless, the distance to the national average level in these regions is quite large.

Growth and decline leaders

In the current ranking, ten regions showed growth by more than 5 places. The most significant growth in positions was demonstrated by the Republic of Crimea, the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, and the Republic of Khakassia. The growth leader was the Republic of Crimea, which moved from 66th to 55th place. For the second year in a row, the Republic of Crimea has shown a significant improvement in its positions, which is a consequence of positive changes in the social and economic spheres. The republic is among the leaders among the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in terms of the growth rates of many socio-economic indicators. The aggregate rating score of the Republic of Crimea in the Rating - 2017 increased by 4.27 points. This was facilitated by the improvement of such indicators as the volume of deposits and deposits of individuals, the ratio of cash income to the cost of a fixed set of consumer goods and services, the share of the population with incomes below the subsistence level. Also in the Republic, the unemployment rate has decreased, the time spent looking for a job has decreased, mortality from external causes has decreased, the general morbidity rate has decreased, the provision of preschool children with places in preschool educational institutions has increased, the share of state (municipal) educational organizations that meet modern educational requirements has increased, and a number of other indicators.

The Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug has risen by 8 places and in the Rating - 2017 it takes 16th place. The consolidated rating score increased by 4.27 points. This result was the result of an increase in the provision of doctors, an increase in the capacity of outpatient clinics, a decrease in the crime rate, a decrease in mortality from external causes, a decrease in the share of utilities (water supply, sewerage networks, and heating and steam networks) that need to be replaced, and an increase in security costs. atmospheric air per unit of emissions. In addition, in the Autonomous Okrug, the volume of deposits of individuals in banks increased and a number of economic indicators improved, including an increase in the volume of production of goods and services, an increase in the share of profitable enterprises.

The Republic of Khakassia in the Rating - 2017 took 51st place, which is 7 positions higher than in the previous rating. The region's consolidated rating score increased by 3.79 points. In the previous year, the republic also rose by 7 places. The main factors that contributed to the growth of the Republic of Khakassia's positions in the Rating - 2017 were a decrease in the unemployment rate, an increase in the volume of deposits of individuals in banks, a decrease in the share of the population with incomes below the subsistence level, a decrease in mortality from external causes and infant mortality, an increase in the provision of preschool children. places in preschool educational institutions, an increase in the share of state (municipal) educational organizations that meet modern educational requirements. Also, the provision of the population with housing has increased in the republic, the share of profitable enterprises has increased and a number of other indicators have improved.

Tula region, Sevastopol, Khabarovsk Territory, Udmurt Republic, Murmansk Region, Amur Region and the Chechen Republic are also among the leaders in terms of improving their positions in the rating. The positions of these regions of the Russian Federation in the ranking have improved by 6 places.

The positions of the Republic of Komi (-6 seats), the Republic of Adygea (-7 seats), the Oryol region (-8 seats) and the Republic of North Ossetia-Alania (-15 seats) have decreased by more than 5 places.

The decline in the position of the Republic of North Ossetia-Alania is due to a deterioration in its position on a number of indicators, including: the ratio of the population's monetary income to the cost of a fixed set of consumer goods and services, the share of the population with incomes below the subsistence level, the unemployment rate, the share of state (municipal) educational organizations, meeting modern training requirements. Some economic indicators have also worsened. The volume of production of goods and services has decreased, the share of profitable enterprises has decreased. At the same time, it can be noted that a number of indicators of the Republic of North Ossetia-Alania have improved. Among them are life expectancy at birth, infant mortality, the share of dilapidated and dilapidated housing, and some others.

In the Oryol Region, the ratio of the population's monetary income to the cost of a fixed set of consumer goods and services has worsened, unemployment has increased and the terms of job search for unemployed have increased, emissions of pollutants from stationary and mobile sources have increased, and the provision of hospital beds has decreased. In addition, the deterioration of some economic indicators had a negative impact on the ranking position, in particular: a decrease in investment in fixed assets, a decrease in the share of profitable enterprises. At the same time, positive dynamics of some indicators was recorded in the Oryol region, for example, the crime rate decreased, the mortality rate of the population from external causes and infant mortality decreased. It should be noted that the consolidated rating score of the Oryol region decreased slightly - by only 0.33 points.

The Republic of Adygea has worsened its position in the ranking due to an increase in the level of infant mortality, a decrease in the provision of preschool children with places in preschool educational institutions, a decrease in the capacity of outpatient clinics, a decrease in the provision of hospital beds, an increase in air emissions of pollutants from stationary and mobile sources, an increase in the time job search by the unemployed and the deterioration of a number of other indicators. At the same time, the decrease in the proportion of the population with incomes below the subsistence level, an increase in the provision of housing for the population, and a decrease in the crime rate can be called as positive factors.

The Komi Republic dropped by 6 places in the rating, but the value of the aggregate rating score decreased by only 0.23 points. Among the main factors that had a negative impact on the position of the Republic of Komi in the ranking, one can single out an increase in the share of the population with incomes below the subsistence level, a deterioration in the ratio of cash income to the cost of a fixed set of consumer goods and services, and a decrease in the provision of hospital beds. In addition, investments in the republic decreased and the share of profitable enterprises decreased, which also contributed to a decrease in positions in the rating. At the same time, a number of indicators taken into account when calculating the rating have improved. In particular, the level of unemployment in the republic has decreased, the level of crime and mortality from external causes has decreased, and emissions of pollutants into the atmosphere have decreased.

When calculating the rating, 72 indicators were analyzed, which are combined into 11 groups characterizing the main aspects of the quality of life in the region: the level of income of the population, employment and the labor market, housing conditions of the population, safety of living, demographic situation, environmental and climatic conditions, public health, etc. level of education, provision of social infrastructure facilities, level of economic development, level of development of small business, development of the territory and development of transport infrastructure.

Also on the topic

Types of journalism Main journalistic genres

The cycle of substances and the flow of energy in nature presentation for the lesson in biology (grade 10)

Analysis of the reliability of the equipment of the rolling mill "2500" Calculation of the main technical and economic indicators

Cucumbers and tomatoes in the same polycarbonate greenhouse: how to place and care for them - video instruction

Condition monitoring of armature bearings