An unexpected system error has occurred. Mikhail Mishustin: “We are not going to control the expenses of citizens

Until December 3, Russians must pay tax on their property, land and transport for 2017. But the personal account on the website of the Federal Tax Service (FTS) is working intermittently - three Vedomosti employees were unable to enter their office on Tuesday and Wednesday. "The service is temporarily unavailable due to technical work," read the inscription on its page. A few minutes after the crashes, the service started working again.

The Federal Tax Service constantly checks the work of the personal account and the percentage of refusals at the entrance does not exceed 0.2%, says the representative of the service: we have prepared for the peak dates - we have additionally increased the throughput compared to last year. FTS sends notices of tax payment from June to October. But the peak of the load on the service traditionally falls on the last week before the due date for the payment of property taxes, the representative of the Federal Tax Service notes: this year is no exception. For example, in June the service had about 300,000 users a day, and in November it had about 2 million.

Head of the Federal Tax Service: The notorious pressure of the tax service does not exist

Mikhail Mishustin tells how to integrate into people's everyday life and make tax payments invisible

Property taxes cannot be paid without notification; they are calculated by the tax authorities themselves. For example, real estate tax is calculated using a complex formula, which, among other things, depends on the region. This year, the service sent 14.3 million notifications through its personal account, and a total of 68 million was sent. In addition to property taxes, the FTS for the first time sent in a package of annual notifications and receipts for personal income tax, which for some reason tax agents did not withhold in 2016-2017 biennium, but information about which was presented to the inspection. By November, the consolidated budgets of the regions had already received 106 billion rubles. - 24% more than a year earlier, a representative of the service reported earlier. In total, last year the Federal Tax Service collected 225.1 billion rubles. taxes on property of the population, follows from the data of the Federal Treasury.

The problem with access to your personal account is not a reason to delay the payment of tax - there are many other services to pay tax, says Taxology partner Alexey Artyukh. In addition to a personal account on the website of the tax service, you can pay taxes on the portal of public services, through the MFC, branches of the federal postal service or banks - partners of the Federal Tax Service. Penalty (for each day of delay the unpaid tax amount multiplied by 1/300 of the key rate of the Central Bank - Vedomosti) is charged automatically for the very fact of delay, adds Taxadvisor senior lawyer Viktor Andreev. If the taxpayer wants to challenge the interest, since the delay was due to the fault of the service, then he needs to go through the so-called notarial examination of the site - to provide confirmation from the notary that the site was not working, says Andreev, such a procedure in Moscow costs about 30,000 rubles. In some cases, in addition to penalties, you will also have to pay a fine, Tatyana Stepanenko, Deputy Head of Tax Consulting at Roedl & Partner, said earlier, if a person's actions prevent the Federal Tax Service from correctly calculating the amount of tax.

The guy faces criminal punishment

“We want to hold a rally in defense of the pilot, senior lieutenant Nefedov. Come, ”- a phone call from an acquaintance of a veteran from Armavir took me by surprise. A rally in defense of an officer? This is something new for Russian democracy ...

The honored ace said that veterans - graduates of the Armavir Aviation School - can no longer look at the lawlessness that is happening against their colleague - pilot of the Baltic Fleet naval aviation Sergei Nefedov.

In May 2017, in the first independent flight on a Su-27 fighter, he damaged the plane while landing. For this mistake, the lieutenant was convicted under a criminal article, having appointed him a two-year suspended sentence with the payment of damage in 27 million rubles.

The damaged Su-27 was restored in a couple of weeks. He flies again. But the "criminal lieutenant" was removed from flight work, although not only veterans, but also his commanders, stood up to defend Sergei. "MK", ​​relying on the documents at its disposal, tried to understand this story.

In the simulator cockpit.

To be honest, at first I did not even believe in all this, I decided: some kind of nonsense. How many young pilots make mistakes on their first solo flight? Yes through one. Only of varying severity. And what, to judge everyone?

Do you remember the favorite movie of pilots of all time "Only" old men "go to battle? And the Maestro's catchphrase when Lieutenant Grasshopper damaged the plane while landing: “Remove from flights! Do not give a hundred grams! To appoint on duty ... Eternal duty on the airfield ... "

This is a perfectly adequate punishment for such a mistake. And even then for the first time. After all, if a boy was taught to fly, he cannot be kept on the ground forever. And the point here is not even the tearful lyrics about dreams of the sky, clipped wings and other "poetics". The fact is that training for the profession of a pilot is too expensive for the state.

I remember that at the St. Petersburg Military Medical Academy I once had a chance to hear how an honored professor explained to future aviation doctors why they should take special care of the health and psychological state of military pilots. The teacher gave an example: “We take the scales. On one bowl we put gold bars, on the other we put a lieutenant-pilot. When the bowls are equal, calculate the cost of the ingots, and you will find out how much it costs the state to train a pilot. Literally worth its weight in gold. "

So what terrible crime did Lieutenant Nefedov commit if military prosecutors - people who guard not only financial, but also other legitimate interests of the state - suddenly decided not to let him fly? Who is this terrible "criminal pilot" Nefedov?

System error

There were no military men in the family of Sergei Nefedov. But he still dreamed of the army since childhood and always wanted to become a pilot. At the age of 14, he entered the Neklinovskaya school of initial flight training near Taganrog, and after graduation - at the Krasnodar flying school.

His flying youth fell on the years of difficult army reforms. Since the 90s and until the mid-2000s, our military aircraft practically did not fly. There was a shortage of everything: aircraft, spare parts, kerosene ... Especially for flight schools.

The cadets were told: be patient, if you come to the regiment, you will fly in, there is more fuel there. But the same problem awaited them in the shelves. The commanders always faced a choice: to give kerosene to young lieutenants, who were barely taught to approach the plane, or to support the training of captains and majors, who, in the event of war, can be entrusted with the execution of a combat mission. It is clear that the choice was not made in favor of young people.

Then, under Minister Serdyukov, military aviation began to be cut in the bud. For several years in a row, cadets were not recruited to aviation schools - they brought the system of universities "to a new look." Pilots were dismissed from regiments in batches. None of the reformers counted the “gold bars” spent on their training.

Later, with the arrival of Sergei Shoigu in the military department, they woke up. They counted and wept. It turned out that more than 1,300 pilots are missing in combat aviation. They tried to return the dismissed, take them from the "civilian" and put them into operation. It turned out - late. Someone has already flown on Boeing and Airbus, receiving very good money, and someone has settled on the ground. They were replaced by newcomers, who, thanks to the notorious "new look", did not have time to really put on the wing.

... After graduating from the flight school, Lieutenant Nefedov was assigned to Kaliningrad, to one of the military units of the Baltic Fleet's naval aviation. In November 2013, at the Center for Retraining and Training of Fighter Aviation Flight Personnel in Savasleika (Nizhny Novgorod Region), he began to master the Su-27P fighter: he completed a course of theoretical training, was engaged in simulators.

However, the unit lacked training aircraft, and for three years in a row Nefedov was sent to Yeisk, to the naval aviation training center "to maintain flight skills", where he flew on the training L-39. In aviation it is called a "flying desk".

When finally it was his turn, they began to "take out" Sergei in a Su-27. Immediately before the first independent flight, he and an instructor performed twelve export flights and one test flight. Everything is good and excellent.

... On May 18, 2017, on a Su-27P aircraft, Nefedov took off on his own. He completed all the tasks in the sky successfully. But when the car was already on the ground, the lieutenant made a mistake - he mixed up the control levers located nearby.

Sergei Nefedov (right) with a colleague.

Case materials. From an expert assessment on possible erroneous actions of the pilot:

“After completing the flight mission, the pilot performed a landing approach from a circle at an altitude of 300 meters. 2 seconds after the main wheels touched the runway at the end of the precision landing strip, the pilot lowered the nose wheel. After 1 second of a run on three wheels, the pilot mistakenly, unintentionally, instead of pressing the release button of the brake parachute, set the landing gear crane switch to the "retracted" position.

Simply put, the aircraft at a speed of about 200 kilometers per hour caught the nose of the runway, as a result of which part of the skin, radar fairing, some external equipment and engine air inlets were damaged.

In flying slang, this is called "breaking the strut" of the landing gear. The case is not unique. If you tell about this in the company of pilots, everyone as one vying with each other immediately begins to remember who, where, when, in which of the military units "broke the rack" in the same way.

Moreover, on aircraft of the Su-27P modification, this, as it turned out, is generally considered a systemic error. This is facilitated by one serious ergonomic flaw in the cab. The test pilots demanded that the designers eliminate it even during the testing of the machine. They wrote: lock the landing gear retraction valve when the plane is already on the ground.

This deficiency was listed in the first stage of development work, noted in the test report approved by the Commander-in-Chief of the Air Force on November 19, 2004, but was never eliminated.

That is, we are talking about the fact that aircraft designers placed control levers in the cockpit without taking into account the possible behavioral reactions of a person, thereby not creating reliable protection against accidental retraction of the landing gear of an aircraft that has already landed on the runway.

Case materials. Expert assessment of the Su-27P cockpit ergonomics (the document was signed by seven senior test pilots with the rank of major to colonel):

“When conducting joint state tests of the aircraft ... the flight personnel of military unit 15650 revealed the following ergonomic drawback of the aircraft cabin: there is no blocking of landing gear retraction on the ground.

... Levers, the incorrect or accidental activation of which can lead to an emergency, must be highlighted in shape, color, have a safety device and, if necessary, must be removed from the common row on the shield.

Conclusion: the lack of blocking of landing gear retraction on the ground on the Su-27P aircraft is an ergonomic drawback and a violation of the requirements of paragraph 4.6.1 of OTT VVS-86, book 1, part 2, which can lead to inadvertent retraction of the landing gear on the ground. "

"Let them sit in the cockpit and try to fly!"

The litigation of Lieutenant Nefedov is now widely discussed on aviation websites. In almost all pilots, the decision made in relation to him causes anger. Someone suggests “to fire the prosecutor, the investigator, and the judge for inconsistency with the position held,” someone jokes: “Nefedov got off lightly, he accidentally damaged the plane. And if he deliberately broke it, like Talalikhin or Gastello? "

There are those who blame the commanders for everything: they say, they put a half-trained lieutenant in the cockpit, and now they want to blame all their mistakes on him.

I must say right away: in this situation, commanders are very active in defending their subordinates and are not going to pin any mistakes of their own on him.

I am opposed to someone judging the pilot for a mistake! If they think that everything is so simple in our aviation, let them sit in the cockpit and try to fly! - so sharply and categorically expressed his position in a conversation with me the commander of the naval aviation, Hero of Russia, Major General Igor Kozhin. He personally petitioned the investigating authorities to discontinue the case, but his appeal was rejected.

As for the raid, Senior Lieutenant Nefedov has it really small. The court records say 22 hours over the past three years. But this is still how to calculate: 22 hours is the total flight time on the Su-27, of which, after a long break, immediately before the first independent flight - 7 hours 38 minutes.

In addition, here one should take into account the psychological state of a young pilot on such an important flight for him. And if you remember how many years he went to him, how many obstacles all sorts of "reformers" put in his way, can you imagine what emotional stress a person could experience!

From the case materials. The conclusion of the medical and psychological examination (signed by five military doctors, three of whom are doctors of medical sciences, two are candidates):

“... Excessive neuropsychic stress in flight, due to a low level of training for flights at low altitudes and excessive motivation to successfully complete the flight mission, could lead to overstrain of mental processes, the development of the phenomenon of premature mental demobilization after a successful landing, a decrease in control over parameters, and - as a result, the occurrence of erroneous actions.

The constructive (ergonomic) drawback of the Su-27P aircraft, associated with the lack of blocking of the landing gear retraction crane by compressing the landing gear on the ground, contributed to the fact that the erroneous action of the guard of Senior Lieutenant S.A. Nefedov, due to the above circumstances, led to a serious aviation incident " ...

Here I would especially like to draw your attention to the fact that the conclusions of almost all examinations do not refer to an "accident", but specifically to an "incident". For any lawyer, the difference between these concepts is fundamental: an "incident" is only a prerequisite for a flight accident.

In this case, such a prerequisite entailed the repair of the aircraft, for which, however, it was not even necessary to involve the specialists of the repair plant. The unit's aircraft engineers replaced the damaged parts using their stocks from old aircraft, and the Su-27P was already flying in three weeks. The pilot also remained alive and well. Everything seems to be in order, but, despite this, suddenly there is a "criminal" article 351 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation "Violation of the rules of flights and preparation for them."

From a legal point of view, “violation” is a deliberate act, “error” is an act without intent. Aviation violations do happen. When, for example, there is a person in the cockpit who violates the flight mission, the orders of the commander, flight safety rules. All this can lead to serious, irreversible consequences.

But was there any intent in Nefedov's actions? So why was this punitive mechanism launched, which creates a precedent that now makes it possible to make a rogue criminal out of any pilot who made a mistake?

Case materials. From the appeal of the Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor of Labor Psychology, Honored Scientist in the field of aerospace medicine, Major General V.A. Ponomarenko to the head of the Military Investigation Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for the Baltic Fleet, Major General of Justice S.A. Sharshavykh: “I am deeply convinced, that the mistake made by the pilot, Senior Lieutenant Sergei Nefedov, during landing is not a reason for bringing him to criminal responsibility. … Such a precedent in aviation practice will inevitably lead to dire consequences.

The pilots will refuse to fly, because they will know that for any mistake in training, training, retraining they will be subject to criminal court. "

Got into reports - no turning back

As Sergei's colleagues said, none of them at first even thought that things would take such a steep turn.

Usually, the mechanism for considering such cases in aviation is as follows: the flight safety service of the Ministry of Defense conducts a preliminary investigation, after which it gives an opinion on whether there was some kind of violation in terms of flight preparation or there was simply a pilot error.

In this case, Nefedov's misconduct was defined as a mistake, nothing more. A criminal case, however, is instituted in any case, but then, on the basis of the available examinations and conclusions of various specialists, proving that there was a mistake, the criminal case is terminated.

However, this time the military prosecutor's office went for broke. As one of the commanders of Nefedov said, "they went out of their way to accuse the boy." When Sergei's commanders heard that the court of first instance - it took place in February 2017 at the Chernyakhovsky Garrison Court of Kaliningrad - passed a sentence: two years probation with the payment of damages of 27 million rubles, they immediately realized: how so? They started to act, but it was too late. The military prosecutor's office has already recorded this case as its asset.

And what about us? What got into the reports - there is no turning back. But the appeal was still filed. The court of second instance in March 2018 rejected this decision, sending the case for further investigation.

Case materials. From the ruling of the court of appeal: “... The likelihood of a possible mistake by Nefedov, excluding any liability associated with the presence of defects and features of the aircraft, was not checked during the investigation of the criminal case. The possibility of making such an error is evidenced by ... ”(the list of documents presented to the court follows).

In addition, the court of appeal found that the amount of damage of 27 million rubles assigned to Nefedov was unreasonably overstated, since the calculation was based on the cost of new parts that were not installed on the damaged aircraft during the repair.

This financial item with the recalculation of damage has literally become a lifesaver for investigators. Now they are driving around the country, everywhere figuring out how much such an aircraft repair using "used" parts could cost. At the same time, they strenuously try not to notice the point of the appeal ruling, where the very fact of the pilot's guilt is questioned, which allegedly attracts criminal punishment.

What did you think? - says my friend Armavir pilot. - Prosecutors, perhaps, themselves would be glad to cancel everything that they “muddied”, but in this case, one of them will have to answer. Who wants to?

They say they thought to dismiss the case "due to newly discovered circumstances," but it turned out to be not so easy either. So now they are squeezing further. And so, you see, they will "move up" in damage, reduce the amount of payment, and it will turn out: it seems like they executed the appeal decision and did not particularly harm themselves.

That is, it turns out that the issue of appeal rests solely on money: more or less will have to be paid. And the pilot was appointed guilty a priori. His fate does not seem to be worried about the investigation. Although, it would seem, the logic of the investigation should be completely different: first, it is necessary to determine the degree of Nefedov's guilt, and then begin to calculate what damage was caused to the state as a result of this guilt.

But so far only the investigation itself is causing damage to the state. It has been running since May 2017. The plane, because of which all this fuss has risen, has been flying for a long time, but the pilot has not: the person under investigation is prohibited from flying.

It is hard to imagine that all this is being done in the interests of the state. And what would have happened if military investigators had worked in the same way during the Great Patriotic War? I think our aviation would have missed dozens of aces now known to the whole world in its ranks.

For example, who does not remember the legendary pilot, three times Hero of the Soviet Union Alexander Pokryshkin? He was called "the heavenly horror of the fascists." When he flew out on a mission, a warning was heard on the German airwaves: "Attention, Pokryshkin is in the air!" But few people know that the first plane that Pokryshkin shot down was our Soviet Su-2 bomber. He mistook it for a German plane.

Later, the famous pilot said more than once that if there were no smart, decent people among the NKVD investigators, his military career could have ended before it began.

From the memoirs of Air Marshal, Hero of the Soviet Union, Honored Military Pilot of the USSR Ivan PSTYGO:“At the end of June 1941 in Moldova, two nines of our aircraft went to bomb the crossing. I was in charge of my staff.

The navigator reports to me in the air: "The cover fighters have approached, now let's go more fun!" Then one "MiG" turned around and slammed into my squadron commander - Gudzenko Mikhail Ivanovich. Su-2 started to smoke and went down. Pokryshkin, then the captain, was flying in the MiG. We bombed, returned. The regiment commander ordered me to fly to the crash site in Po-2. The commander was alive, and the navigator had three bullets in his heart. They dug a grave, gave a salute from a pistol. "

... In June 2018, Senior Lieutenant Nefedov had to go through a planned medical flight commission (VLC) in Moscow, without the conclusion of which the officer is not allowed to fly. But the investigator wrote to the unit commander not to let his subordinate go either on a business trip or on vacation, since investigative actions are underway.

As a result, Nefedov did not manage to pass the VLK in time. Only three months later, after the intervention of a lawyer, Sergei was released to the VLK to the capital's doctors.

Military pilot Nefedov in Chernyakhovsk leaves the registry office with his young wife Svetlana.

But a week after he successfully passed all doctors, from a dentist to a psychiatrist, the investigator again sent him to Moscow, already to the 111th center of the Ministry of Defense for a second psychiatric examination, in order to find out if he had mental abnormalities, does he distinguish colors , cabin elements, etc.

Why all this is needed, while one can only guess. Although, it seems to me, if an unknown starley suddenly turned out to be insane, for the investigation it would be a way out: it seems like the wolves are full and the sheep are safe. But the results of the examination, which Nefedov underwent on October 8, are not yet ready. Why so long? Perhaps the task facing the doctors turned out to be too difficult?

After all, if the conclusion of the psychiatric examination initiated by the investigation turns out to be in favor of the senior lieutenant, the investigation will simply have to remove the "criminal" article from the young pilot. And what does it mean? That's right: that the one who brought him under her will be punished.

Well, what did you think? - commented on this situation one military lawyer, who asked not to be named. - The "stick" system has not been canceled. The work of law enforcement officers in our country is still assessed not by the reduction of crime, but by the detection rate.

There are a number of registered criminal cases. And there is a number of disclosed ones. They may not correlate with each other. But the closer these numbers are to each other, the more effective the work of law enforcement agencies. And the fact that the fate of people can be behind this is the tenth thing. The forest is being cut down - the chips are flying.

... This time the fate of Sergei Nefedov, the guard of the senior lieutenant of the Baltic Fleet's naval aviation, may become a "chip". A man who all his life wanted to become a cool military pilot. And even now, I still haven't given up this hope.

Meanwhile

Coordination with the city authorities of the place and time of the rally in defense of the military pilot Sergei Nefedov was delayed. Therefore, its initiators decided to hold a meeting of veterans for now. It took place in Armavir on Tuesday. Representatives of the media and local television were invited to it.

It is very common to hear complaints about the work of the taxpayer's office from users of the Tax Committee website. It is difficult for beginners to set up a personal computer, systematically errors appear when submitting tax reports, users cannot receive or print documents. Problems with the work of the taxpayer's office constantly appear on the pages of Shakhimat, but government officials are in no hurry to solve the problems of taxpayers. At the same time, thousands of users work with the website of the tax committee every day, and in all likelihood, unlike officials, these problems are being solved. To find out the secrets of working with the taxpayer's office, it was decided to seek help from outside specialists.

The ShakhimT site managed to get in touch with a competent specialist, an engineer with decent experience in the maintenance of software for computer technology and automated systems.

- Sergey, what, in your opinion, are the most popular mistakes occurring when working with the taxpayers' cabinet?

- Today the taxpayers office is visited by whole families. At the same time, they try to use one computer and only one configured browser. Due to the peculiarities and imperfections of the Tax Committee software, errors often occur related to the use of several keys on one computer. Perhaps the most popular mistake is the message "Your RNN does not match the RNN of the signature certificate." An error occurs after the user has entered the account under his own key, filled in tax reports, but it is not possible to send it to the server.

- What browser should you use when working with a taxpayer's office?

- Taxpayers have long opted for the Google Chrome browser. It both works faster with the site and is easier to customize. Setting up Google Chrome is to open full access to the taxpayers' office. In additional browser settings, you should add restrictions exceptions for cabinet.salyk.KZ.

- How to configure the browser to work with the taxpayer's office? Any instructions?

- Unfortunately, the instructions on the website of the Tax Committee for setting up and working with browsers are morally and technically outdated. To get rid of the errors that arise, you need to seriously modify all the settings of your browser. Ideal recommendations do not yet exist, but if they do appear, then in terms of their volume they may exceed the Great Soviet Encyclopedia (just kidding).

- How to get rid of the popular error and the message "Your TRN does not match the TRN of the signing certificate" from the Tax Committee server?

- If a group of taxpayers using one computer to send tax returns is sure that everything is in order with their keys, then it is enough to set up the work with cookies. The paradox of the Tax Committee software is that when the key is registered, some data is saved in the browser. When reporting is sent, the saved cookie data is compared with the key data. If the cookies of the previous key are not deleted, then at the time of sending tax returns the cookies will be different, a failure will occur and the message "Your TRN does not match the TRN of the signature certificate" will appear. Don't panic! The prepared form for sending should be saved using the "Save in the PN account" button. Select "Settings" in the Google Chrome browser, then "Show advanced settings", after "Personal data" and "Content settings". A new pop-up window will appear, where in "Cookies" you should select the inscription "Delete local data when you close the browser." In general, and all the settings for this problem. After closing the browser, the saved key cookies will be deleted.

- With the problem of errors and the display of the message "Your TRN does not match the TRN of the signature certificate", we contacted the Software User Support Service of the NK MF RK twice, having previously described the problem in detail (the answers are numbered 1449747 and 1449750). Here is the first answer.

Dear User of Information Systems of the Tax Code of the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Kazakhstan, This message is issued if, when sending the taxpayer taxpayer uses a key with a taxpayer identification number, different from the one under which he entered the NP Cabinet. The TRN under which the taxpayer entered the NP Cabinet is visible in the upper right corner of the NP Cabinet "You entered as ...." When the taxpayer taxpayer is sent to the NPO Cabinet, the taxpayer taxpayer is extracted from the signature certificate and compared with the taxpayer taxpayer's taxpayer authorized in the system.

- And this is the second answer.

Dear User of Information Systems NK MF RK, please clean:
1. Internet browser cache.
2. Java application cache. The instruction is in the attachment.
Then go to the IR's Cabinet again.

- Sergey, how effective are the methods of eliminating the error that were proposed by the support service?

- To put it mildly, the answers are not professional and do not solve the user's problems. In the first case, this is a standard unsubscribe, in the second case, the proposed solutions do not eliminate the error. Doubters can experiment!

»» »We eliminate errors in the taxpayer's office

23 comments on the article "We eliminate errors in the taxpayer's office"

An amazingly simple solution! The error "Your TRN does not match the TRN of the signature certificate" was constantly flown when trying to send tax reports. I climbed a bunch of sites, all around solid tips on how to read the instructions. Thanks to smart people for simple solutions.

Working with the taxpayers' office is like communicating with a blonde, new tricks every time. For several years of work, I have not managed to get used to the perversions in the software. Either the browser is wrong, or the settings do not match. I sympathize with all taxpayers who submit tax reports electronically!

The same problems. I have not been able to send a report for a month. As soon as I press the entrance from a personal computer or from someone else's computer, the Computer Setup Wizard comes out, the browser does not match, the java version does not match, etc. How many of them have I downloaded, they all do not fit. What will we do?

• In any public service center there are several computers for independent work with the egov.kz portal. The egov.kz website also has access to the Taxpayer's Office - between Electronic Licensing and Electronic Government.

  Try to submit your tax report to the PSC (or to the Tax Code).
  For me, this move turned out to be easier than installing Java on a computer with Windows 10.1.

  • Stepan writes:

    Why suffer so much ?! Software specialists, of course. But after all, there are paid services where everything will be set up for you for a small amount in 30 minutes. And there is no need to go anywhere and kill yourself.

    Toddler writes: