- Paul Craig Roberts, former Deputy Secretary of the Treasury, on the threat the FBI poses to our civil liberties.
There has been a lot of rhetoric recently comparing Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler. This is a concern that a Nazi-type regime may be developing in America.
However, this process began a long time ago.
In fact, after World War II, the US government recruited Hitler's collaborators, approved of his rules, adopted his law and order mentality, his incremental tactics, and began laying the foundations for the rise of the Fourth Reich.
In other words, ordinary citizens working with government agencies helped create the monster that became Nazi Germany. Writing in The New York Times, Barry Even painted a particularly chilling portrait of how an entire nation becomes complicit in its own decline by looking the other way:
“In perhaps the most provocative statement, author Eric Johnson says: “Most Germans may not have realized until late in the war that they were living in a terrible dictatorship.” Not to say they didn't know about the Holocaust - Johnson shows that millions of Germans must have known at least part of the truth. But, as he concludes, “a silent Faustian bargain was struck between the regime and the citizens.” The government looked the other way when petty crimes were committed. Ordinary Germans turned away as Jews were forced into ghettos and killed, and they fueled the greatest crimes of the 20th century not through active cooperation, but through passivity, denial and indifference.
Much like the German people, “we the people” have become passive, polarized, gullible, easily manipulated, and have lost critical thinking skills. Crazed by entertainment speeches, politics and screen devices, we are too complicit, silent partners in the creation of a police state similar to the terrorist one practiced by previous regimes.”
Could we have a Fourth Reich?
As I pointed out in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, it is already being created right under our noses.
Original taken from swamp_lynx to the Fourth Reich
Simultaneously with the creation of the foundation of the post-war Nazi economy, Bormann became concerned with the creation of personnel for post-war Nazism. Training went in two directions: youth and personnel itself. In addition to military training, the children were also taught how to organize sabotage and how to live underground and abroad. In March 1944, preparations began for appearances, shelters, and legalization schemes. The success of these events was facilitated by the regime's dense coverage of the population: one secret police officer for every 600 people, one informant for every 300 people.
In 1944, British and American intelligence drew attention to the sudden disappearance of a number of important figures from the political life of the Reich: some simply disappeared, others left the party and the SS and were even persecuted. But this is the highest level, it was about important, but at best, dozens of people; but at the middle level of the NSDAP, the preparation of the future underground became widespread. Party officials, known only at the local level, were transferred to another city, where they suddenly began to show themselves as anti-Nazis. These people received new documents, their personal files were replaced with new ones, or materials about their negative attitude towards Hitler, the party and the state were inserted into the old ones; some even ended up behind bars or in a concentration camp for some time. There were 8-9 thousand of these people, and the Allies, having occupied Germany, accepted them with open arms, filling their occupation administration with them. K. Reis in 1944 believed that the Nazis would need 15 years to “surface” and crown their underground blitzkrieg with success, bringing their people de jure or de facto to power in Germany (FRG): the Irish underground took a century, in order to achieve their goals for the socialists - 25. “The Russians needed to lose two wars. The Nazis cannot wait for another lost war. They want to come to power to start a third world war...Armed with super science and super technology plus what they looted, including possibly Solomon's treasure, the Nazis and their ideology were well equipped to begin building the Fourth Reich."
To begin with, the Nazis needed to ensure the escape of the Reich leadership, especially Hitler and the elite, as well as the removal of samples of super equipment, documentation, money, jewelry and art objects. Even during the war, they (the SS) created a whole network of “secret paths” (and the persons, structures and shelters serving them) around the world, which were called “ratlines” (a play on words: rat paths and at the same time cables that they hold on to). After the war, this network ensured the Nazis' withdrawal from Germany. The main cables were "Kamaradenwerk" ("Comradely Work") and ODESSA ("Organisation der ehemaligen SS-Angehorigen" - "Organization of Former SS Members"). Kamaradenwerk was created by Luftwaffe Colonel Hans Ulrich Rudel (2,530 missions to his credit), ODESSA by Bormann and Müller, and practical leadership was provided by Otto Skorzeny. The author of the gigantic Encyclopedia of the Third Reich, Louis Snyder, defined ODESSA as “a large-scale underground Nazi organization for the movement of people.”
Kamaradenwerk worked closely with an organization that had enormous resources and ensured the escape of more Nazis than any other organization: the Vatican Refugee Bureau. Pope Pius XII contributed greatly in relations with the Vatican. Under this name, Cardinal Eugenio Maria Giuseppe Giovanni Pacelli became pope, who was much more friendly towards the Nazis, and one of the books about whom is simply called: “Hitler’s Pope.” Pius XII's predecessor, Pius XI, was very lukewarm towards the Nazis. On February 10, 1939, the day before the next planned public anti-fascist speech, dad died; the official version is a heart attack (the speech was never found after death). According to rumors, the culprit in the death of the pope was one of the Vatican doctors - Dr. Francesco Saverno Petacci (father of Clara Petacci, Mussolini's mistress, who was killed with him) - he allegedly gave the pope a lethal injection. The rumors were confirmed by information found in the diary of the French Cardinal Eugene Tisserand, who began as an agent of French military intelligence. From the Vatican, the Nazis went mainly to Latin America - primarily to Argentina, but also to Brazil, Uruguay, Paraguay, Chile, Bolivia, less often to Spain and Portugal, and even less often to the Middle East.
Argentine dictator Juan Peron was a fan of Hitler; Peron himself was greatly influenced by his wife Eva (Evita). Having started her “career” as a prostitute, she moved from one lover to another, choosing more and more status ones (while increasingly despising people from the elite) and finally ended up in Peron’s bed. In 1947, she made the widely publicized "Rainbow Tour" of Europe. The tour was a cover-up action for the main operation - placing in Swiss banks what the Peron family “borrowed” from Bormann, on the one hand, and organizing the transfer of Nazi millions from Europe to Argentina. This was done by the head of the “cable” “Die Spinne” (“Spider”) Otto Skorzeny. Former Gestapo chief Müller also settled well in Argentina, and continued to control the country's secret police even after Peron was overthrown in 1955 and he went to Spain. Klaus Barbier, the “butcher of Lyon,” settled in Bolivia under the name of Klaus Altmann. Here he traded weapons and became one of the organizers of the famous Medellin cartel. The Nazis generally actively developed drug trafficking in Latin America. They had two reasons: economic - money and ideological - to continue the destruction of subhumans in a different way than before - with the help of drugs. Well, since the drugs were going to the USA, it was also a way to indirectly get even with the Americans, whom the Germans considered “a rabble of mutants of all races who consider themselves supermen.”
Some of the Nazis ended up in the Middle East - in Egypt, Syria, Iran. Egyptian intelligence at the turn of 1940-1941 - 1950s was headed by the former chief of the Warsaw Gestapo L. Gleim, who took the Arabic name Ali Nasher. Himmler's former adviser B. Bender (Colonel Ibn Salem), former Gestapo chief of Dusseldorf J. Demler and many others also served there. I’m not even talking about O. Skorzeny’s activity in Egypt, about how he advised Nasser. The Arab geopolitical project of the late 1940s, directed against Israel, the USA and the USSR (and at the same time designed to strengthen the confrontation between the USA and the USSR in the Middle East), was the work of former SS men, whose children and grandchildren, often converting to Islam for the sake of appearances, worked and work in the Arab-Muslim world. This world attracts them not only with oil and gas, but also with a certain occult potential, the possession of which was concerned with the Order of the Black Sun and especially its elite, led by 12 knights.
Not all Nazis, especially those from intelligence, fled Germany. Some of them remained there, actively collaborating with the Americans in the ranks of the Gehlen Organization. This Nazi intelligence network became the eyes and ears of Americans at the very beginning of the Cold War. In 1942, Gehlen became head of the Fremde Heere Ost (Overseas Armies Department of the East), a sector of the General Staff that analyzed intelligence coming from the eastern front. To avoid conflicts with the Abwehr, Gehlen created his own network of spies and informants - the Gehlen Organization. In April 1945, Gehlen offered his organization to the British to fight Russia, but received no response. Then, having put their archives in 50 metal containers and hidden them in three different places in Germany, the Gehlenites decided to surrender to the Americans and offer their services to them.
Eisenhower's chief of staff, Walter Bedell Smith (from 1950 to 1953, he would be director of the CIA, and then would replace A. Harriman as ambassador to the USSR), in violation of American laws, brought Gehlen and several of his people on his plane to Washington. It was agreed that Gehlen would work autonomously against the Russians, but within the framework of the goals and objectives set by the Americans. Thus, the Nazi underground in Germany was put into the service of the United States, thereby purchasing freedom from persecution. As a result, “virtually everything the United States learned about Soviet goals and capabilities at the very end of World War II came from the anti-Communist underground, filtered through a Nazi organization linked to the international financial elite.” Gehlen's organization developed in close contact with the CIA, being in fact its department for Russian and East European affairs. She received 200 million dollars from CIA funds - Allen Dulles highly valued Gehlen, about whom he said that he had the mind of a professor, the heart of a soldier and the instincts of a wolf. In 1946, Gehlen returned to Germany and began creating German intelligence - even before the formation of the Federal Republic of Germany. The number of his organization grew from 350 to 4 thousand people. From 1956 to 1968, Gehlen, a Knight of the Order of Malta, was president of the Bundesnachriechtendienst (BND), the German intelligence service.
In 1980, Martin Bormann, who was over 70, lived in Buenos Aires, wrote memoirs and continued to travel a lot around America. A huge business empire was under his control. It was ruled by representatives of the second generation of Nazis - the children and nephews of those 100 thousand high-ranking Nazis who moved to South America after the war. They were educated at the best universities in Europe and America, and secretly trained in such possessions as the colony of Dignidad in Chile. Former Nazis became a frequent presence in Chile after Kissinger orchestrated Augusto Pinochet's rise to power in 1973 to protect the interests of Kissinger's patron, Rockefeller, in that country.
The Order of Malta (Order of the Hospitallers, Order of the Knights of Rhodes) plays an important role in the religious, political and financial life of the West. Among other things, he communicates between the Vatican and the Anglo-Saxon intelligence services of the CIA and MI6. The Order has been active in Russia for the last decade, but Russian members of the Order belong to the outer circle and, naturally, are not allowed to know real secrets or make decisions. It is, so to speak, a membership “painted on canvas.”
Perhaps one of the last actions, which was led by the already elderly Bormann, was the conclusion of peace between the Fourth Reich and Israel, and more precisely, between the intelligence service of the Fourth Reich “Desi” and the Mossad. After the Mossad kidnapped Eichmann, who lived quietly in South America until he began writing memoirs in which, among other things, he talked about contacts between the Nazis and Zionists, Desi and Mossad began a mutual merciless shooting of employees, cover agents, informants. Since 1961, Mossad losses have been more than 100 people per year. Desi's losses, if they were smaller, were not much. In the 1980s, the parties decided to reach an agreement. In Argentina, with the “co-sponsorship” of the CIA, Borman and a certain “gray eminence” from Israel, who once led the Jewish lobby in the United States, met. The Nazis transferred gold to Israel (so much that they had to export it within two days by two Hercules transport planes) and 5 billion dollars by transfer through Swiss banks (A.V. Morozov suggests that in the 1990s, most likely, it was With these funds, Israel will begin to rapidly expand its nuclear program). The Nazis received guarantees of immunity for German and Western European (but not Eastern European) Nazis from persecution by the Mossad and the CIA.
The main goal of Bormann and the Fourth Reich he created as the core of the Nazi international in 1980, as in 1945, remained the rise of Germany and the revival of National Socialism. What's the bottom line so far? What are the results when you balance? “The time for German dominance in Europe, with Mrs. Merkel as the unofficial but undisputed leader, has effectively arrived,” the New York Times wrote in 2011. “Europe is losing its democratic face, and Germany is increasingly asserting its dominant position” - this is already from the article “The Revival of the Fourth Reich, or How Germany is using the financial crisis to conquer Europe,” published by the Daily Mail in August of the same year. The author of the article correctly pointed out the connection between finance and the financial crisis with the rise of Germany: it was the Germans who benefited most from the introduction of the euro (two-thirds of Germany's economic growth in the last decade is associated with the introduction of the euro), and now, in the event of its abandonment (51 percent want this) Germans), will lose less. What he got wrong was in the numbering: the Fourth Reich already exists, it was created in 1943-1947, and its financial base played a big role in the rise of the Federal Republic of Germany in the 1950-1960s, in the phenomenon of the “German miracle”; so we should be talking about the Fifth Reich.
As the founding fathers of the Fourth Reich once dreamed, Germany is the economic leader of Europe: in 2011 its GDP amounted to 3 trillion 280 billion 530 million dollars. An alliance of the largest German companies is being created in Germany, which will purchase deposits and extract raw materials around the world - a serious application. No less important is the fact that in the financial struggle in Europe, the Germans are driving into a corner their main enemy - the British, with whom they have been fighting since the 1870s. The current policy of Germany leads to the loss of independence of the UK banking system, the independence of the City - the world's main offshore, with which the British will never agree. And in this regard, Cameron’s threat about his country’s possible exit from the European Union is not an empty phrase. The budgetary regulation measures that the Germans propose are anti-liberal in nature and are aimed at a serious modification of capitalism as a system. The Chairman of the 42nd Davos Forum (January 25-29, 2012), German Klaus Schwab, openly declared the systemic crisis of capitalism and that this system “no longer corresponds to the world around us.”
A. Merkel speaks in the same spirit. She was the first among Western leaders to launch an attack on multiculturalism, which is an integral element of the neoliberal economic scheme and is unthinkable outside of it. Following Merkel, English Prime Minister Cameron (during a visit to Germany) and, when he was President of France, Sarkozy, criticized multiculturalism. In other words, it was Germany, with its rich anti-liberal and anti-universalist, nationalist traditions, that the world elite instructed to begin dismantling what they had sworn over the past 30 years. This indicates a serious, qualitative change in Germany’s place in world affairs. An even greater confirmation of this is the event that occurred on April 4, 2012.
On this day, one of the largest German newspapers, Suddeutsche Zeitung, published a poem by Nobel laureate in literature (1999) Günter Grass “What must be said” (“Was gesagt werden mu”). This poem is a sharp criticism of Israel for its policy towards Iran, which threatens the destruction of the Iranian people, and in addition to Germany for selling weapons to Israel. Indirectly, this is a reproach to the Germans, who are silent, fearing accusations of anti-Semitism.
As V. Mayakovsky once noted, answering V. Shklovsky’s question about how a poet could write the lines “I love watching children die,” you need to know: when it was written, why it was written and for what purpose. The moment for writing was well chosen: Germany has become an economic leader and has just (October 3, 2010) completed the payment of reparations following the First World War (total equivalent to 100 thousand tons of gold). The key to why and for what purpose it was written is where and how the poem was published: not only in the German newspaper, the translation immediately appeared simultaneously in three of the world's largest newspapers - in the Italian "La Republica", the Spanish "El Pais" and the American " The New York Times." Such a simultaneous North Atlantic salvo against Israel cannot be an accident; a coordinated decision on this kind of action can be made at a level significantly higher than the state level - at the level of leadership of supranational structures of global coordination and management.
There are two goals at once. Firstly, a “black mark” for Israel and that part of the world Jewish diaspora that supports its strict anti-Iranian course and threatens to drag the United States into a conflict with Iran, when the current administration and the clans of the top of the world capitalist class behind it least need this conflict , but most likely negotiations are needed. Secondly, and this is the main thing, the world publication of the poem records the new world status of Germany, and it manifests itself primarily in the lifting of the unspoken ban on Germans criticizing Israel and Jews - that is, the psychological dominant of “the inescapable guilt of the German people before the Jews” is collapsing. The biography of the one who spoke with the poem eloquently speaks about this: from November 1944 to April 1945, Grasse served in
"Waffen SS". In other words, a symbolic action of dual psychohistorical purpose is carried out by a former SS man.
Grass's poem is not the only example of the gradual removal of the Germans' guilt for the past, and indirectly - from the Third Reich, not only before the Jews, but also before other peoples of Europe and, above all, before the Russians. Since 2004, the UN has annually voted on a document on the inadmissibility of xenophobia and racism, in which a separate line emphasizes the inadmissibility of glorifying Nazism. The United States, as a rule, abstained, and European countries voted “for” - that is, against the glorification of Nazism. But in 2011, 17 EU countries voted against this document, thereby opening the door to the glorification of Nazism. And a year earlier, in 2010, the German Historical Museum hosted an exhibition “Hitler and the Germans” with a subtitle quite in the spirit of Nazi rhetoric:
"Hitler as the embodiment of the people's ideal of saving the nation." A reissue of “Mein Kampf” is being prepared - it, according to analysts, was not republished not because the author was Hitler, but because, according to German law, if the author died without leaving heirs, the republication of his works is possible only after 70 years . However, even before the expiration of this period, a quotation book from “Mein Kampf” will apparently be published.
Another line of indirect rehabilitation of Nazism and the Third Reich is attempts to equate the Reich and the USSR, Hitlerism and Stalinism, to place on the USSR the same blame as Germany for the outbreak of the Second World War and to present our Great Patriotic War as a fight between two totalitarianisms, of which one the other is worse. We already have scumbags who call the Great Patriotic War a “Soviet-Nazi” (that is, intra-totalitarian) war. Entire collections are being published about the Great Patriotic War, where the points of view of Russian and German historians on the Second World War are presented as equals. At the same time, not only German historians, but also some Russian ones talk about the “struggle of totalitarianisms,” completely forgetting that it was Hitler’s Germany that committed an act of aggression against the USSR, that it was its leadership that set the task of the physical and psychohistorical destruction of the Russians, and that the war with Hitler was a battle for the physical and historical existence of Russians and other indigenous peoples of Russia, especially Slavic ones. Totalitarianism has nothing to do with it.
So, Germany is “on horseback”, its status in the world system is steadily increasing, economically it seems to be settling scores with Great Britain. Are the dreams of the Nazi bosses who created the “invisible Reich” coming true? The USSR and Yugoslavia were destroyed, the Germans partly got even with the Serbs; Germany “won” Bulgaria from Russia; The neoliberal (counter)revolution weakened the position of the dollar. Deutschland is uber alles again? Everything is fine? Everything is good - but something is not good. And there’s a lot of this “bad” stuff. As they said in Soviet films, “you rejoice early, fascist.”
Firstly, no one has canceled the document called “Kanzler akt” (“Chancellor Act”), the existence of which was announced at the beginning of the 21st century by the retired German intelligence general Komossa. In May 1949, the general writes, the leadership of occupied Germany was forced to sign a document with the United States (valid for 150 years, that is, until 2099), according to which the candidacy of the Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany was approved in Washington; In addition, domestic and foreign policy, education and media policies are largely determined in Washington. According to Camossa, the “Chancellor Act” is still in force - no one has terminated it, and if we take into account the presence of American bases in Germany and control over public opinion, then today’s Germany, with all its economic successes, cannot be called anything other than a US protectorate it is forbidden.
Secondly, we should not forget about the degree of economic and political integration of the German elite into the Pax Americana, into Atlanticism as a project. In the post-war period, American corporations invested huge amounts of money in Germany.
Thirdly, and this is perhaps the most important thing: the situation with human material and demographics. Not only will there be not 82, but 59 million Germans in the middle of the 21st century, a significant percentage of this population will be Turks, Kurds, Arabs, African blacks - that is, those whom the Nazis considered racially inferior; The social degradation of the lower classes, including the lower part of the middle class, is in full swing. No wonder T. Saracen called his book “The Self-Liquidation of Germany.” According to sociological surveys, 40 percent of German men want to be housewives, and 30 percent consider starting a family “an excessive responsibility.” However, the situation with women in the Germanosphere is not the best - and as you know, the degeneration of any species begins with the females. As an illustration, just look at the trilogy of the Austrian director Ulrich Seidel “Paradise” (“Love”, “Faith”, “Hope”). The heroine of the first film is a loser who is quietly going crazy; the heroine of the second is her sister, a religious maniac who ends up doing what Madonna did with the crucifix; the heroine of “Hope” is the daughter of the heroine of “Love”. This is an overfed (100 kg) creature of 13 years old, constantly chewing chips, popcorn and hamburgers, lying on the sofa and chatting on a cell phone - that’s all mindless activity,
“Piece” for those who in the Third Reich would have been classified as “subhuman.” Even the fact that the director is an Austrian, not a German, does not change the situation; he belongs to the Germanosphere (and Hitler was also an Austrian). With such human material, let alone the Fifth Reich, you can’t build anything at all. The “Fifth Reich” with a non-Aryan face is something that the leaders of the Third and Fourth Reichs could never have dreamed of in their worst nightmares. It turns out that, ironically or, as Hegel would say, the insidiousness of History, the “Nazi International” for seven decades worked on biomass, which no Reich needs at all: a bottle of beer, a piece of sausage and a rubber doll are enough. In our film “The Fate of the Drummer,” one of the heroes (more precisely, anti-heroes) asks another: “Is this what you fought for, old man Yakov?” I’m tempted to ask a rhetorical question: “Is this what you fought for, old man Martin?” For the “Fifth Reich” with an African face and an Arab kuffiyeh? It turns out that the “mole of history” deceived the Nazis, and Heimdal will never blow the horn, heralding the beginning of Ragnarok - the Last Battle. Holmgang (Court of the Gods) ordered otherwise. And yet the Nazis have heirs in the modern world. But this is a topic for another discussion.
The rise of German imperialism and the exaggerated “Russian threat”
The main ideological support of the Nazis, which provided them with massive financial and political support from large German industrialists, was the communist and Soviet threat. The main direction of the Nazi military attack, which absorbed two-thirds of their best troops, was aimed at the east and aimed at the conquest and destruction of Russia.
The “Russian threat” justified Nazi Germany's conquest and occupation of Ukraine, the Balkans, Eastern Europe and the Baltic states, relying on a significant proportion of local Nazi collaborators.
After the defeat, partition and disarmament of Germany and with the expansion of the Soviet Union's sphere of influence, the United States restored the rights of Nazi industrial and banking giants, officials and intelligence agents. At first, they were involved in restoring the economy of their country and consolidating political power, collaborating with the American military occupation forces.
But in the late 1960s. Germany regained its economic primacy in Europe and, in alliance with France and England, took its place at the forefront of European “integration.” It soon began to dominate the major decision - the creation of the institutions of the European Union (EU). The EU served Germany as an instrument of sly conquest. Year after year, through “aid” and low-interest loans, the EU made it easier for German capitalists to penetrate markets and financially expand throughout Southern and Central Europe. Germany set the agenda for Western Europe, achieving economic dominance while benefiting from US subversion and encirclement of Eastern Europe, Russia, and the Baltic and Balkan states.
Germany's Great Leap Forward – Annexation of East Germany and the Death of the USSR
Germany's projection of power on a global scale would never have happened if it had not annexed East Germany. Despite statements by the West German side about charity and gratuitous “help” to the East, the regime in Bonn acquired several million qualified engineers, workers and specialists, captured factories, productive farms and, most importantly, Eastern European and Russian markets for industrial goods in the amount of billions of dollars. From an emerging influential partner of the EU, Germany has transformed into a dynamic expansionist power in Europe, especially in relation to the economies of the Warsaw Pact countries.
The annexation of East Germany and the overthrow of communist governments in the East allowed German capitalists to dominate the markets of the former Eastern Bloc. Acting as a trading partner, they seized control of key industrial enterprises through corrupt privatizations carried out on the orders of pro-capitalist client regimes newly installed in power. Due to the fact that the Czech Republic, Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Bulgaria, and the Baltic states “privatized” and “denationalized” strategic sectors of the economy, trade, media and social services, a “united” Germany could again occupy a privileged place. Against the background of how Russia found itself in the hands of bandits, newly minted oligarchs and political proteges of Western capitalists, its entire industrial infrastructure was devastated, and the country itself was turned into a gigantic raw material export region.
Germany transferred its once equal trade relations with Russia to a “colonial” format: Germany exported high-value industrial products and imported gas, oil and raw materials from Russia.
With the annexation of the "other Germany", the restoration of capitalism in Eastern Europe and the dominance of client regimes willing to submit to the German-dominated European Union and the US-led NATO military command, German power grew exponentially.
German political and economic expansion through “popular uprisings” controlled by local political agents was soon accompanied by an American-led military offensive, the pretext for which was provided by separatist movements. Germany intervened in Yugoslavia, aiding and inciting separatists in Slovenia and Croatia. She supported the bombing of Serbia by US and NATO aircraft, as well as the far-right self-proclaimed Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), which was involved in the terrorist war in Kosovo. Belgrade was defeated, and regime change led to the establishment of a neoliberal client state. The United States built the largest military base in Europe in Kosovo, Montenegro and Macedonia became EU satellites.
Germany was becoming the continent's main economic power simultaneously with the expansion of NATO and the strengthening of the American military presence on Russia's borders.
Germany and the New World Order
While Presidents Bush and Clinton heralded a “new world order” based on unilateral military superiority, Germany advanced its new imperial order using its political and economic leverage. Both centers of power, Germany and the United States, pursued the common goal of rapidly incorporating new capitalist regimes into their regional organizations - the European Union (EU) and NATO - and expanding their sphere of influence on a global scale. Given the reactionary origins and trajectory of the eastern, Baltic and Balkan regimes towards vassalage, as well as political fears of the people's reaction to the loss of employment, social security and independence resulting from their implementation of wildly neoliberal "shock policies", the puppet rulers immediately "submitted applications" to join the EU and NATO as subordinate members. In doing so, they traded sovereignty, markets, and national ownership of the means of production in exchange for economic handouts and the “free” movement of labor—a safety release valve for millions of unemployed workers. German and English capital received millions of trained immigrant workers with wages below those existing on the labor market, as well as unhindered access to markets and resources. The US secured NATO military bases and gained military strength for its imperial wars in the Middle East and South Asia.
The military and economic dominance of the United States and Germany in Europe was based on maintaining Russia's status as a weak semi-vassal state, as well as on the continued economic growth of their economies after the initial plunder of the national economies of the former communist countries.
For the United States, undeniable military superiority throughout Europe was the springboard for imperial expansion in the near future in the Middle East, South Asia, Africa and Latin America. NATO was “internationalized”, becoming a global military offensive alliance: first in Somalia, Afghanistan, then in Iraq, Libya, Syria and Ukraine.
The Rise of Russia, Islamic Resistance and the New Cold War
During the “decade of shame” (1991-2000), the extraordinary privatization measures of Russia’s dependent rulers, taken in the interests of investors from the EU and the United States, as well as oligarchic gangsters, resulted in a large-scale plunder of the entire national economy, state treasury and national heritage. The defining image of the EU and the US about Russia has become the image and reality of a gigantic defeated vassal state, unable to pursue an independent foreign policy, maintain at least some semblance of a modern functioning economy and ensure the rule of law. Post-communist Russia, which by any measure was a failed state, was called “liberal democracy” by all Western capitalist politicians, and all their minions in the media repeated this after them.
The unplanned rise of Vladimir Putin and the gradual replacement of some of the most notorious "Judas" among neoliberal officials, and most importantly, the restoration of the Russian state with an adequate budget and functioning national institutions, were immediately perceived as a threat to American military supremacy and German economic expansion . Russia's transition from vassalage to the West to the return of its status as a sovereign independent state has set in motion an aggressive counter-offensive by the US and EU. In an attempt to bring Russia back into submission through street demonstrations and elections, they financed a political opposition favored by the neoliberal oligarchy. Their efforts to remove Putin and restore a Western vassal state failed. What worked in 1991 with Yeltsin's anti-Gorbachev power grab turned out to be useless against Putin. The vast majority of Russians did not want a return to the decade of shame.
At the start of the new century, Putin and his team established new ground rules under which oligarchs could retain their ill-gotten fortunes and conglomerates of businesses, provided they did not use their economic leverage to seize state power. Second, Putin has revived and restored scientific, technological, military, industrial and cultural institutions, and centralized trade and investment decision-making within a wide range of public and private decision-making entities not accountable to Western policymakers. Third, he began to assess and correct the failures of the Russian security services, particularly with regard to the threats posed by Western-sponsored "separatist" movements in the Caucasus, and especially in Chechnya, as well as the surge in US-backed "color revolutions" in Ukraine and in Georgia.
At first, Putin optimistically assumed that since Russia is a capitalist country without any competing ideology, the normalization and stabilization of the Russian state would be welcomed by the US and EU. He even imagined that they would accept Russia as an economic, political and NATO partner. Putin even made attempts to find the ground for joining NATO and the EU, as well as cooperation with them. The West did not try to disabuse Putin of his illusions. In fact, he encouraged him, which did not stop him from increasing his support for domestic opposition to Putin, as well as preparing a series of imperial wars and sanctions in the Middle East, aimed at traditional Russian allies in Iraq, Syria and Libya.
Given that the strategy of disruption from within failed to force President Putin to step down, and the Russian state prevailed over neo-vassals, the demonization of Putin became permanent and turned into a howl. The West has finally leaned in favor of a “strategy of alienation” with the goal of isolating, encircling and weakening the Russian state by undermining its allies and trading partners.
USA and Germany against Russia – fabricating the “Russian threat”
Russia was persuaded to support US and NATO wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya in exchange for the promise of closer integration with Western markets. The US and EU accepted Russian cooperation in the takeover and occupation of Afghanistan, including the provision of logistics lines and bases. NATO countries have secured Russian support for sanctions against Iran. They used Russia's naive support for a no-fly zone over Libya to unleash a full-scale air war. The United States openly financed the so-called “color revolutions” in Georgia and Ukraine, which were a dress rehearsal for the 2014 coup. Each forceful seizure of power allowed NATO to install anti-Russian rulers, ready and full of desire to place their states in the vassal service of Germany and the United States.
Germany was the initiator of the European imperial offensive in the Balkans and Moldavia, which had strong economic ties with Russia. High-ranking German officials "visited" the Balkans in order to strengthen their ties with the vassal regimes of Slovenia, Bulgaria, Slovakia and Croatia. The European Union, under German leadership, ordered the vassal Bulgarian regime of Boyko “the blockhead” Borisov to block the passage of the Russian-owned South Stream gas pipeline to Serbia, Hungary, Slovenia and beyond. The Bulgarian state lost $400 million in annual revenues... Germany and the United States financed pro-NATO and pro-European protégé politicians in Moldova, achieving the election of Iurie Leanca as Prime Minister. As a consequence of Leanca's servile desire for vassalage to the EU, Moldova lost $150 million in exports to Russia. Leanca's pro-European policy runs counter to the views of the majority of Moldovans - 57 percent consider Russia the country's most important economic partner. About 40 percent of Moldova's working-age population works in Russia, and 25 percent of Moldova's $8 billion GDP comes from remittances from abroad.
German and American empire builders are suppressing dissenting voices in Hungary, Serbia and Slovenia, as well as in Moldova and Bulgaria, whose economies and populations are suffering from the Russian gas pipeline blockade imposed on them. But Germany’s full-scale economic war against Russia is primary in relation to the interests of its vassal states - they must sacrifice themselves for the sake of the “higher good” of the emergence of a German economic empire and the military encirclement of Russia by US and NATO forces. The extremely brutal dictates of German imperial interests, clearly expressed throughout the EU, as well as the willingness of the Balkan and Baltic regimes to sacrifice fundamental economic needs are the most visible signs of the emergence of a German Empire in Europe.
In parallel with the fierce anti-Russian economic campaign, the United States, through NATO, is busy building up military power along and across Russia’s borders. The American protege, NATO chief Jens Soltenberg, boasts that this year NATO has increased patrols of Russia's sea and land borders by fighters and bombers by 5 times, conducted military exercises every two days, and significantly increased the number of warships in the Baltic and Black Seas.
Conclusion
It is absolutely clear that the United States and Germany want to return Russia to the vassal status of the nineties. They don't want a "normal relationship". Since Putin moved to rebuild the Russian state and economy, Western powers have launched a series of political and military interventions that have eliminated Russian allies, trading partners, and independent states.
The emergence of extremist regimes, deeply anti-Russian in spirit, in Poland, Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania served as an advanced cover for the NATO offensive and the German economic invasion. Now, under Chancellor Merkel, Hitler's "dream" of conquering the East through unilateral military conquest has taken the form of conquest by stealth in Northern and Central Europe, by economic extortion in the Balkans, and by forceful coups in Ukraine and Georgia.
The German economic ruling class is divided between a dominant pro-American sector willing to sacrifice lucrative trade with Russia today in hopes of taking over and plundering the entire economy of post-Putin Russia (run by "revived Yeltsin clones"), and a minority industrial sector that wants to end sanctions and return to normal economic relations with Russia.
Germany's fear is that its tame rulers in the East, especially in the Balkans, are vulnerable to popular unrest caused by the economic sacrifices they impose on the population. Accordingly, Germany fully supports the idea of a new NATO rapid deployment force, supposedly designed to counter the non-existent “Russian threat”, but in fact to support shaky vassal regimes.
The “Russian threat,” the ideology driving the American and German offensives across Europe and the Caucasus, is a repetition of the same doctrine that Hitler used to win the support of his country's industrial bankers, conservatives, and right-wing collaborators abroad among extremists in Ukraine, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria.
The real crisis was provoked by the American-European seizure of power in Ukraine, carried out through vassal political agents with the support of corrupt oligarchs and Nazi street fighters. The forceful seizure of power in Ukraine posed an extreme security threat to the very existence of Russia as an independent state. After the coup in Kyiv, NATO pushed its puppet regime in Kyiv towards the military liquidation of independent regions in the Southeast and the seizure of Crimea, which would completely deprive Russia of its strategic positions in the Black Sea.
Russia, a victim of the NATO takeover, was branded an “aggressor.” All the authorities and the media sang along with the Big Lie. Two decades of US and NATO military expansion to Russian borders and the economic expansion of Germany and the EU into the Russian market were left behind the scenes.
Ukraine is the most important strategic base from which the United States and NATO can organize an attack on the central regions of Russia, and Germany's largest single market since its annexation of the GDR. The United States and Germany view the conquest of Ukraine not only as the highest value in itself, but also as the main condition for launching a full-scale offensive with the aim of strangling the Russian economy through sanctions and oil dumping, as well as creating a military threat to Russia. The strategic goal is to impoverish the Russian population and re-engage the half-dead opposition to overthrow the Putin government and return Russia to permanent vassalage.
The American and German imperial elites, realizing that the matter is not limited to Russia alone, believe that if they can control Russia, they will be able to encircle, isolate and attack China from the west as well as from the east.
They are not wild-eyed fanatics. But being ardent supporters of a permanent war to end the Russian presence in Europe and prevent China from becoming a world power, they are ready to step on the brink of nuclear conflict.
The central ideological element of American-German imperial expansion and conquest in Europe and the Caucasus is the “Russian threat.” This is a litmus test for determining opponents and allies. Countries that do not adhere to sanctions are targeted. The media reproduces lies. The "Russian threat" became the battle cry of the subservient vassals - a false justification for imposing terrible sacrifices on the interests of their imperial masters in Berlin and Washington - fearing a rebellion of the "sacrificed" population. There is no doubt that besieged Russia will be forced to make sacrifices. The oligarchs will flee to the West, and liberals will crawl under their beds. But just as the Soviets turned the tide of the war at Stalingrad, so the Russian people, after the first two years of Operation Bootstrapping, will survive, prosper, and once again become a beacon of hope for all people trying to free themselves from the tyranny of US-NATO militarism and economic dictate of Germany-EU.
Simultaneously with the creation of the foundation of the post-war Nazi economy, Bormann became concerned with the creation of personnel for post-war Nazism. Training went in two directions: youth and personnel itself. In addition to military training, the children were also taught how to organize sabotage and how to live underground and abroad. In March 1944, preparations began for appearances, shelters, and legalization schemes. The success of these events was facilitated by the regime's dense coverage of the population: one secret police officer for every 600 people, one informant for every 300 people.
In 1944, British and American intelligence drew attention to the sudden disappearance of a number of important figures from the political life of the Reich: some simply disappeared, others left the party and the SS and were even persecuted. But this is the highest level, it was about important, but at best, dozens of people; but at the middle level of the NSDAP, the preparation of the future underground became widespread. Party officials, known only at the local level, were transferred to another city, where they suddenly began to show themselves as anti-Nazis. These people received new documents, their personal files were replaced with new ones, or materials about their negative attitude towards Hitler, the party and the state were inserted into the old ones; some even ended up behind bars or in a concentration camp for some time. There were 8-9 thousand of these people, and the Allies, having occupied Germany, accepted them with open arms, filling their occupation administration with them. K. Reis in 1944 believed that the Nazis would need 15 years to “surface” and crown their underground blitzkrieg with success, bringing their people de jure or de facto to power in Germany (FRG): the Irish underground took a century, in order to achieve their goals for the socialists - 25. “The Russians needed to lose two wars. The Nazis cannot wait for another lost war. They want to come to power to start a third world war...Armed with super science and super technology plus what they looted, including possibly Solomon's treasure, the Nazis and their ideology were well equipped to begin building the Fourth Reich."
To begin with, the Nazis needed to ensure the escape of the Reich leadership, especially Hitler and the elite, as well as the removal of samples of super equipment, documentation, money, jewelry and art objects. Even during the war, they (the SS) created a whole network of “secret paths” (and the persons, structures and shelters serving them) around the world, which were called “ratlines” (a play on words: rat paths and at the same time cables that they hold on to). After the war, this network ensured the Nazis' withdrawal from Germany. The main cables were "Kamaradenwerk" ("Comradely Work") and ODESSA ("Organisation der ehemaligen SS-Angehorigen" - "Organization of Former SS Members"). Kamaradenwerk was created by Luftwaffe Colonel Hans Ulrich Rudel (2,530 missions to his credit), ODESSA by Bormann and Müller, and practical leadership was provided by Otto Skorzeny. The author of the gigantic Encyclopedia of the Third Reich, Louis Snyder, defined ODESSA as “a large-scale underground Nazi organization for the movement of people.”
Kamaradenwerk worked closely with an organization that had enormous resources and ensured the escape of more Nazis than any other organization: the Vatican Refugee Bureau. Pope Pius XII contributed greatly in relations with the Vatican. Under this name, Cardinal Eugenio Maria Giuseppe Giovanni Pacelli became pope, who was much more friendly towards the Nazis, and one of the books about whom is simply called: “Hitler’s Pope.” Pius XII's predecessor, Pius XI, was very lukewarm towards the Nazis. On February 10, 1939, the day before the next planned public anti-fascist speech, dad died; the official version is a heart attack (the speech was never found after death). According to rumors, the culprit in the death of the pope was one of the Vatican doctors - Dr. Francesco Saverno Petacci (father of Clara Petacci, Mussolini's mistress, who was killed with him) - he allegedly gave the pope a lethal injection. The rumors were confirmed by information found in the diary of the French Cardinal Eugene Tisserand, who began as an agent of French military intelligence. From the Vatican, the Nazis went mainly to Latin America - primarily to Argentina, but also to Brazil, Uruguay, Paraguay, Chile, Bolivia, less often to Spain and Portugal, and even less often to the Middle East.
Argentine dictator Juan Peron was a fan of Hitler; Peron himself was greatly influenced by his wife Eva (Evita). Having started her “career” as a prostitute, she moved from one lover to another, choosing more and more status ones (while increasingly despising people from the elite) and finally ended up in Peron’s bed. In 1947, she made the widely publicized "Rainbow Tour" of Europe. The tour was a cover-up action for the main operation - placing in Swiss banks what the Peron family “borrowed” from Bormann, on the one hand, and organizing the transfer of Nazi millions from Europe to Argentina. This was done by the head of the “cable” “Die Spinne” (“Spider”) Otto Skorzeny. Former Gestapo chief Müller also settled well in Argentina, and continued to control the country's secret police even after Peron was overthrown in 1955 and he went to Spain. Klaus Barbier, the “butcher of Lyon,” settled in Bolivia under the name of Klaus Altmann. Here he traded weapons and became one of the organizers of the famous Medellin cartel. The Nazis generally actively developed drug trafficking in Latin America. They had two reasons: economic - money and ideological - to continue the destruction of subhumans in a different way than before - with the help of drugs. Well, since the drugs were going to the USA, it was also a way to indirectly get even with the Americans, whom the Germans considered “a rabble of mutants of all races who consider themselves supermen.”
Some of the Nazis ended up in the Middle East - in Egypt, Syria, Iran. Egyptian intelligence at the turn of 1940-1941 - 1950s was headed by the former chief of the Warsaw Gestapo L. Gleim, who took the Arabic name Ali Nasher. Himmler's former adviser B. Bender (Colonel Ibn Salem), former Gestapo chief of Dusseldorf J. Demler and many others also served there. I’m not even talking about O. Skorzeny’s activity in Egypt, about how he advised Nasser. The Arab geopolitical project of the late 1940s, directed against Israel, the USA and the USSR (and at the same time designed to strengthen the confrontation between the USA and the USSR in the Middle East), was the work of former SS men, whose children and grandchildren, often converting to Islam for the sake of appearances, worked and work in the Arab-Muslim world. This world attracts them not only with oil and gas, but also with a certain occult potential, the possession of which was concerned with the Order of the Black Sun and especially its elite, led by 12 knights.
Not all Nazis, especially those from intelligence, fled Germany. Some of them remained there, actively collaborating with the Americans in the ranks of the Gehlen Organization. This Nazi intelligence network became the eyes and ears of Americans at the very beginning of the Cold War. In 1942, Gehlen became head of the Fremde Heere Ost (Overseas Armies Department of the East), a sector of the General Staff that analyzed intelligence coming from the eastern front. To avoid conflicts with the Abwehr, Gehlen created his own network of spies and informants - the Gehlen Organization. In April 1945, Gehlen offered his organization to the British to fight Russia, but received no response. Then, having put their archives in 50 metal containers and hidden them in three different places in Germany, the Gehlenites decided to surrender to the Americans and offer their services to them.
Eisenhower's chief of staff, Walter Bedell Smith (from 1950 to 1953, he would be director of the CIA, and then would replace A. Harriman as ambassador to the USSR), in violation of American laws, brought Gehlen and several of his people on his plane to Washington. It was agreed that Gehlen would work autonomously against the Russians, but within the framework of the goals and objectives set by the Americans. Thus, the Nazi underground in Germany was put into the service of the United States, thereby purchasing freedom from persecution. As a result, “virtually everything the United States learned about Soviet goals and capabilities at the very end of World War II came from the anti-Communist underground, filtered through a Nazi organization linked to the international financial elite.” Gehlen's organization developed in close contact with the CIA, being in fact its department for Russian and East European affairs. She received 200 million dollars from CIA funds - Allen Dulles highly valued Gehlen, about whom he said that he had the mind of a professor, the heart of a soldier and the instincts of a wolf. In 1946, Gehlen returned to Germany and began creating German intelligence - even before the formation of the Federal Republic of Germany. The number of his organization grew from 350 to 4 thousand people. From 1956 to 1968, Gehlen, a Knight of the Order of Malta, was president of the Bundesnachriechtendienst (BND), the German intelligence service.
In 1980, Martin Bormann, who was over 70, lived in Buenos Aires, wrote memoirs and continued to travel a lot around America. A huge business empire was under his control. It was ruled by representatives of the second generation of Nazis - the children and nephews of those 100 thousand high-ranking Nazis who moved to South America after the war. They were educated at the best universities in Europe and America, and secretly trained in such possessions as the colony of Dignidad in Chile. Former Nazis became a frequent presence in Chile after Kissinger orchestrated Augusto Pinochet's rise to power in 1973 to protect the interests of Kissinger's patron, Rockefeller, in that country.
The Order of Malta (Order of the Hospitallers, Order of the Knights of Rhodes) plays an important role in the religious, political and financial life of the West. Among other things, he communicates between the Vatican and the Anglo-Saxon intelligence services of the CIA and MI6. The Order has been active in Russia for the last decade, but Russian members of the Order belong to the outer circle and, naturally, are not allowed to know real secrets or make decisions. It is, so to speak, a membership “painted on canvas.”
Perhaps one of the last actions, which was led by the already elderly Bormann, was the conclusion of peace between the Fourth Reich and Israel, and more precisely, between the intelligence service of the Fourth Reich “Desi” and the Mossad. After the Mossad kidnapped Eichmann, who lived quietly in South America until he began writing memoirs in which, among other things, he talked about contacts between the Nazis and Zionists, Desi and Mossad began a mutual merciless shooting of employees, cover agents, informants. Since 1961, Mossad losses have been more than 100 people per year. Desi's losses, if they were smaller, were not much. In the 1980s, the parties decided to reach an agreement. In Argentina, with the “co-sponsorship” of the CIA, Borman and a certain “gray eminence” from Israel, who once led the Jewish lobby in the United States, met. The Nazis transferred gold to Israel (so much that they had to export it within two days by two Hercules transport planes) and 5 billion dollars by transfer through Swiss banks (A.V. Morozov suggests that in the 1990s, most likely, it was With these funds, Israel will begin to rapidly expand its nuclear program). The Nazis received guarantees of immunity for German and Western European (but not Eastern European) Nazis from persecution by the Mossad and the CIA.
The main goal of Bormann and the Fourth Reich he created as the core of the Nazi international in 1980, as in 1945, remained the rise of Germany and the revival of National Socialism. What's the bottom line so far? What are the results when you balance? “The time for German dominance in Europe, with Mrs. Merkel as the unofficial but undisputed leader, has effectively arrived,” the New York Times wrote in 2011. “Europe is losing its democratic face, and Germany is increasingly asserting its dominant position” - this is already from the article “The Revival of the Fourth Reich, or How Germany is using the financial crisis to conquer Europe,” published by the Daily Mail in August of the same year. The author of the article correctly pointed out the connection between finance and the financial crisis with the rise of Germany: it was the Germans who benefited most from the introduction of the euro (two-thirds of Germany's economic growth in the last decade is associated with the introduction of the euro), and now, in the event of its abandonment (51 percent want this) Germans), will lose less. What he got wrong was in the numbering: the Fourth Reich already exists, it was created in 1943-1947, and its financial base played a big role in the rise of the Federal Republic of Germany in the 1950-1960s, in the phenomenon of the “German miracle”; so we should be talking about the Fifth Reich.
As the founding fathers of the Fourth Reich once dreamed, Germany is the economic leader of Europe: in 2011 its GDP amounted to 3 trillion 280 billion 530 million dollars. An alliance of the largest German companies is being created in Germany, which will purchase deposits and extract raw materials around the world - a serious application. No less important is the fact that in the financial struggle in Europe, the Germans are driving into a corner their main enemy - the British, with whom they have been fighting since the 1870s. The current policy of Germany leads to the loss of independence of the UK banking system, the independence of the City - the world's main offshore, with which the British will never agree. And in this regard, Cameron’s threat about his country’s possible exit from the European Union is not an empty phrase. The budgetary regulation measures that the Germans propose are anti-liberal in nature and are aimed at a serious modification of capitalism as a system. The Chairman of the 42nd Davos Forum (January 25-29, 2012), German Klaus Schwab, openly declared the systemic crisis of capitalism and that this system “no longer corresponds to the world around us.”
A. Merkel speaks in the same spirit. She was the first among Western leaders to launch an attack on multiculturalism, which is an integral element of the neoliberal economic scheme and is unthinkable outside of it. Following Merkel, English Prime Minister Cameron (during a visit to Germany) and, when he was President of France, Sarkozy, criticized multiculturalism. In other words, it was Germany, with its rich anti-liberal and anti-universalist, nationalist traditions, that the world elite instructed to begin dismantling what they had sworn over the past 30 years. This indicates a serious, qualitative change in Germany’s place in world affairs. An even greater confirmation of this is the event that occurred on April 4, 2012.
On this day, one of the largest German newspapers, Suddeutsche Zeitung, published a poem by Nobel laureate in literature (1999) Günter Grass “What must be said” (“Was gesagt werden mu”). This poem is a sharp criticism of Israel for its policy towards Iran, which threatens the destruction of the Iranian people, and in addition to Germany for selling weapons to Israel. Indirectly, this is a reproach to the Germans, who are silent, fearing accusations of anti-Semitism.
As V. Mayakovsky once noted, answering V. Shklovsky’s question about how a poet could write the lines “I love watching children die,” you need to know: when it was written, why it was written and for what purpose. The moment for writing was well chosen: Germany has become an economic leader and has just (October 3, 2010) completed the payment of reparations following the First World War (total equivalent to 100 thousand tons of gold). The key to why and for what purpose it was written is where and how the poem was published: not only in the German newspaper, the translation immediately appeared simultaneously in three of the world's largest newspapers - in the Italian "La Republica", the Spanish "El Pais" and the American " The New York Times." Such a simultaneous North Atlantic salvo against Israel cannot be an accident; a coordinated decision on this kind of action can be made at a level significantly higher than the state level - at the level of leadership of supranational structures of global coordination and management.
There are two goals at once. Firstly, a “black mark” for Israel and that part of the world Jewish diaspora that supports its strict anti-Iranian course and threatens to drag the United States into a conflict with Iran, when the current administration and the clans of the top of the world capitalist class behind it least need this conflict , but most likely negotiations are needed. Secondly, and this is the main thing, the world publication of the poem records the new world status of Germany, and it manifests itself primarily in the lifting of the unspoken ban on Germans criticizing Israel and Jews - that is, the psychological dominant of “the inescapable guilt of the German people before the Jews” is collapsing. The biography of the one who spoke with the poem eloquently speaks about this: from November 1944 to April 1945, Grasse served in
"Waffen SS". In other words, a symbolic action of dual psychohistorical purpose is carried out by a former SS man.
Grass's poem is not the only example of the gradual removal of the Germans' guilt for the past, and indirectly - from the Third Reich, not only before the Jews, but also before other peoples of Europe and, above all, before the Russians. Since 2004, the UN has annually voted on a document on the inadmissibility of xenophobia and racism, in which a separate line emphasizes the inadmissibility of glorifying Nazism. The United States, as a rule, abstained, and European countries voted “for” - that is, against the glorification of Nazism. But in 2011, 17 EU countries voted against this document, thereby opening the door to the glorification of Nazism. And a year earlier, in 2010, the German Historical Museum hosted an exhibition “Hitler and the Germans” with a subtitle quite in the spirit of Nazi rhetoric:
"Hitler as the embodiment of the people's ideal of saving the nation." A reissue of “Mein Kampf” is being prepared - it, according to analysts, was not republished not because the author was Hitler, but because, according to German law, if the author died without leaving heirs, the republication of his works is possible only after 70 years . However, even before the expiration of this period, a quotation book from “Mein Kampf” will apparently be published.
Another line of indirect rehabilitation of Nazism and the Third Reich is attempts to equate the Reich and the USSR, Hitlerism and Stalinism, to place on the USSR the same blame as Germany for the outbreak of the Second World War and to present our Great Patriotic War as a fight between two totalitarianisms, of which one the other is worse. We already have scumbags who call the Great Patriotic War a “Soviet-Nazi” (that is, intra-totalitarian) war. Entire collections are being published about the Great Patriotic War, where the points of view of Russian and German historians on the Second World War are presented as equals. At the same time, not only German historians, but also some Russian ones talk about the “struggle of totalitarianisms,” completely forgetting that it was Hitler’s Germany that committed an act of aggression against the USSR, that it was its leadership that set the task of the physical and psychohistorical destruction of the Russians, and that the war with Hitler was a battle for the physical and historical existence of Russians and other indigenous peoples of Russia, especially Slavic ones. Totalitarianism has nothing to do with it.
So, Germany is “on horseback”, its status in the world system is steadily increasing, economically it seems to be settling scores with Great Britain. Are the dreams of the Nazi bosses who created the “invisible Reich” coming true? The USSR and Yugoslavia were destroyed, the Germans partly got even with the Serbs; Germany “won” Bulgaria from Russia; The neoliberal (counter)revolution weakened the position of the dollar. Deutschland is uber alles again? Everything is fine? Everything is good - but something is not good. And there’s a lot of this “bad” stuff. As they said in Soviet films, “you rejoice early, fascist.”
Firstly, no one has canceled the document called “Kanzler akt” (“Chancellor Act”), the existence of which was announced at the beginning of the 21st century by the retired German intelligence general Komossa. In May 1949, the general writes, the leadership of occupied Germany was forced to sign a document with the United States (valid for 150 years, that is, until 2099), according to which the candidacy of the Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany was approved in Washington; In addition, domestic and foreign policy, education and media policies are largely determined in Washington. According to Camossa, the “Chancellor Act” is still in force - no one has terminated it, and if we take into account the presence of American bases in Germany and control over public opinion, then today’s Germany, with all its economic successes, cannot be called anything other than a US protectorate it is forbidden.
Secondly, we should not forget about the degree of economic and political integration of the German elite into the Pax Americana, into Atlanticism as a project. In the post-war period, American corporations invested huge amounts of money in Germany.
Thirdly, and this is perhaps the most important thing: the situation with human material and demographics. Not only will there be not 82, but 59 million Germans in the middle of the 21st century, a significant percentage of this population will be Turks, Kurds, Arabs, African blacks - that is, those whom the Nazis considered racially inferior; The social degradation of the lower classes, including the lower part of the middle class, is in full swing. No wonder T. Saracen called his book “The Self-Liquidation of Germany.” According to sociological surveys, 40 percent of German men want to be housewives, and 30 percent consider starting a family “an excessive responsibility.” However, the situation with women in the Germanosphere is not the best - and as you know, the degeneration of any species begins with the females. As an illustration, just look at the trilogy of the Austrian director Ulrich Seidel “Paradise” (“Love”, “Faith”, “Hope”). The heroine of the first film is a loser who is quietly going crazy; the heroine of the second is her sister, a religious maniac who ends up doing what Madonna did with the crucifix; the heroine of “Hope” is the daughter of the heroine of “Love”. This is an overfed (100 kg) creature of 13 years old, constantly chewing chips, popcorn and hamburgers, lying on the sofa and chatting on a cell phone - that’s all mindless activity,
“Piece” for those who in the Third Reich would have been classified as “subhuman.” Even the fact that the director is an Austrian, not a German, does not change the situation; he belongs to the Germanosphere (and Hitler was also an Austrian). With such human material, let alone the Fifth Reich, you can’t build anything at all. The “Fifth Reich” with a non-Aryan face is something that the leaders of the Third and Fourth Reichs could never have dreamed of in their worst nightmares. It turns out that, ironically or, as Hegel would say, the insidiousness of History, the “Nazi International” for seven decades worked on biomass, which no Reich needs at all: a bottle of beer, a piece of sausage and a rubber doll are enough. In our film “The Fate of the Drummer,” one of the heroes (more precisely, anti-heroes) asks another: “Is this what you fought for, old man Yakov?” I’m tempted to ask a rhetorical question: “Is this what you fought for, old man Martin?” For the “Fifth Reich” with an African face and an Arab kuffiyeh? It turns out that the “mole of history” deceived the Nazis, and Heimdal will never blow the horn, heralding the beginning of Ragnarok - the Last Battle. Holmgang (Court of the Gods) ordered otherwise. And yet the Nazis have heirs in the modern world. But this is a topic for another discussion.
The Fourth Reich was created by Bormann, Müller and Kammler in 1943–1945 and, apparently, still exists: it is a network structure, which is also called the “Nazi international” (by the way, one of the sources of the European Union is associated with the Fourth Reich, and the first The model of the European Union was Hitler's). So now it is more correct to talk about the possibility of the emergence of a fifth Reich. The beginning of this process can be conventionally considered October 3, 2010, when a symbolic event occurred: Germany completed the payment of gigantic reparations following the First World War (these reparations are equivalent to 100 thousand tons of gold).
Bormann and Müller, with the help of the SS and Deutsche Bank, created 750 corporations: 233 in Sweden, 214 in Switzerland, 112 in Spain, 98 in Argentina, 58 in Portugal and 35 in Turkey. The Nazis also invested heavily in the drug trade.
For the first time since 1945, Germans gained the right to criticize Jews and the Jewish state - the dominant “enduring guilt of the Germans towards the Jews” is crumbling. And indirectly, Israel is also shown its place in the new Middle Eastern alignment.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel fired the first salvo on multiculturalism, which, by the way, is an integral element of the neoliberal counter-revolution started by the Anglo-Saxons at the turn of the 1970s and 1980s. Others began to repeat this after her: British Prime Minister Cameron and French President Sarkozy. Moreover, Cameron did this in Germany, in Munich, where Hitler began his rise to power.
According to information from retired Austrian intelligence officer General Camossa, at the end of the 1940s, the Americans and Germans signed an act according to which the candidacy of the Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany, as well as, to a large extent, the education system, domestic and foreign policy were determined in Washington. The information field and spiritual life of Germany are largely under American control; the German elite is embedded in the world of Anglo-Saxon closed structures.
The Germans are building a new Reich
Germany has long been called the main link of the European Union. The future of all of Europe directly depends on the Germans, as has happened more than once in history. While the whole world is reading the bestseller “Germany: Self-Liquidation” and waiting for the German collapse promised in the book, completely different forecasts are being made at the same time. Historian, sociologist, political scientist Andrey FURSOV, director of the Center for Russian Studies at Moscow University for the Humanities, academician of the International Academy of Sciences (Innsbruck, Austria), shared his vision of today’s and tomorrow’s Germany with AN.
Awakening
– What is Germany’s place in Europe and the world today?
– Germany is the leader of Europe. Its GDP in 2011 was almost $3.6 trillion. The Western press constantly publishes articles that the time has come for German domination. In the British Daily Mail a year ago there was an article that directly stated: Germany will not stop there and will further strengthen its dominant position - the Fourth Reich is rising. True, the author of the article was somewhat mistaken in terminology. The Fourth Reich was created by Bormann, Müller and Kammler in 1943–1945 and, apparently, still exists: it is a network structure, which is also called the “Nazi international” (by the way, one of the sources of the European Union is associated with the Fourth Reich, and the first The model of the European Union was Hitler's). So now it is more correct to talk about the possibility of the emergence of a fifth Reich. The beginning of this process can be conventionally considered October 3, 2010, when a symbolic event occurred: Germany completed the payment of gigantic reparations following the First World War (these reparations are equivalent to 100 thousand tons of gold).
Another significant event occurred on April 4, 2012: the poem “What Must Be Said” by Günter Grass was published. The poem sharply criticizes Israel and puts it on the same level as Iran. But the most important thing is not this, but the places of simultaneous publication. There are four of them: Süddeutsche Zeitung (Germany), Repubblica (Italy), El Pais (Spain) and The New York Times (USA). It is clear that the decision to simultaneously publish a poem with such an ideological and political orientation in the West can only be made at the level of supranational structures of global coordination and governance. The main point of the poem is not criticism of Israel on the Middle East issue, but the fact that for the first time since 1945 the Germans gained the right to criticize Jews and the Jewish state - the dominant “enduring guilt of the Germans towards the Jews” collapses. And indirectly, Israel is also shown its place in the new Middle Eastern alignment. The figure of the author is indicative - a Nobel laureate in literature, who served in the Waffen SS in 1944-45 - this is also a symbol and a certain message.
Another symbolic event: it was German Chancellor Angela Merkel who fired the first salvo at multiculturalism, which, by the way, is an integral element of the neoliberal counter-revolution started by the Anglo-Saxons at the turn of the 1970s and 1980s. Others began to repeat this after her: British Prime Minister Cameron and French President Sarkozy. Moreover, Cameron did this in Germany, in Munich, where Hitler began his rise to power. Germany now sets the tone on very important issues.
– What is happening in the German intelligence services, in the army?
– The German intelligence services are being reformed in such a way as to best resist network structures. It is difficult for the state bureaucracy to fight such a “reality operator” as networkers, but the Germans have a wealth of experience to rely on - the experience of the Gestapo. By the mid-1930s, this relatively small but highly effective structure had almost completely defeated the Communists and concentrated on Freemasonry, which is mainly a network structure. The work has not gone away.
But the Germans have not yet succeeded in reforming the army as planned - it was thwarted, forcing Defense Minister Theodor zu Guttenberg to resign at the beginning of 2011, accusing him of plagiarism. Zu Guttenberg was going to reform, first of all, command and management structures, and this clearly did not gain him more supporters in the Bundeswehr. But I am convinced that he had serious opponents outside Germany. If the army reform had passed, it would have become one of the most powerful and modern armies. Do we need such a NATO?
– Who is not so interested in the rise of Germany?
– First of all, Great Britain and the closed supranational structures historically tied to it. The Germans are driving Albion into a corner on the issue of tightening budget regulations. London wants to preserve the independence of its sacred City, the main offshore of the modern world. A financial union in Europe on the German model will lead to a reconfiguration of the European Union, to its transformation into the United States of Europe under the leadership of Germany.
Hitler's European Union
– You mentioned the Nazi International, created at the end of the war...
– Bormann and Müller, with the help of the SS and Deutsche Bank, created 750 corporations: 233 in Sweden, 214 in Switzerland, 112 in Spain, 98 in Argentina, 58 in Portugal and 35 in Turkey. The Nazis also invested huge amounts of money in the drug trade in Latin America (thus they also exterminated the “subhumans”). By the way, at the origins of the Medellin cartel was the famous Klaus Barbier, who was hiding in Bolivia and was extradited to the French authorities in 1983.
The Nazis also took care of the post-war state apparatus of Germany. Since the end of 1943, they have carried out an absolutely fantastic operation. They chose 8–9 thousand mid-level officials truly loyal to the Reich, practically unknown outside the cities and towns where they served. They redid their dossier: they say he is a suspicious person, disloyal to the Reich. Sometimes they were given a fictitious six-month sentence, and sometimes they were even imprisoned for a month or two. With these documents, the person was sent to another city, where he calmly waited for the allies. When the Allies arrived, they appointed these very people to local administrations. Thus, a significant part of the administrative apparatus of the post-war Federal Republic of Germany (and to a lesser extent the GDR) were former Nazis, most of whom remained loyal to the Reich and the Fuhrer.
The European Union as a project grows out of Hitler's European Union. And as a structure it was absolutely consistent with German economic and political interests. With the help of the European Union, the Germans peacefully achieved what they did not achieve militarily. For example, the eurozone has its own central bank, but does not have a common treasury or a common fiscal policy. The result: growing differences in the economic development of different countries and the strengthening of the strong, especially Germany. Two-thirds of Germany's economic growth in the last decade has been attributed to the introduction of the euro. Now you can abandon the euro (by the way, 51% of Germans want this).
– The Germans gave loans to other countries so that they could purchase German products. Now that Germany has to pull these countries out of the debt hole, do the Germans not need the European Union?
- Exactly. Germany does not need the European Union in its previous form; it rather needs the United States of Europe with a Carolingian (i.e. German) core. By the way, the European Union has prepared not only an economic, but also a political and administrative basis for German dominance. Few people write about this here (one of the exceptions is O.N. Chetverikova).
Since the 1970s, the process of regionalization of Europe has been actively underway - a project proposed primarily by German politicians. The goal is to allocate territories in states according to ethnolinguistic principles and transform state borders into administrative ones.
In the mid-1980s, two regional associations emerged - the Assembly of European Regions and the Council of Communities and Regions of Europe; in both the Germans set the tone; 250 regions are represented in the Association, whose documents formed the basis of the EU Constitution. The regionalization of Europe itself followed German patterns: the brutal version is Yugoslavia, and the soft version is Belgium, where the Flemings and Walloons coexist. As a result, almost all European countries are fragmented into ethnic pieces, and ethnically homogeneous Germany not only does not fragment, but, due to the disappearance of state borders, “attracts” Austria, parts of Switzerland and Italy; Silesia and Moravia are in question. So to speak, a peaceful Anschluss.
Ghost of Nazism
– Don’t you assume that the rise of Germany corresponds to some kind of pan-Western plan and is beneficial to the Anglo-Saxon elite?
– The modern world is a world not so much of states as of supranational structures and clans. Some Anglo-Saxons benefit, others don’t. In addition, there is no data on the repeal of the so-called Chancellor Act. According to information from retired Austrian intelligence officer General Camossa, at the end of the 1940s, the Americans and Germans signed an act according to which the candidacy of the Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany, as well as, to a large extent, the education system, domestic and foreign policy were determined in Washington. The information field and spiritual life of Germany are largely under American control; the German elite is embedded in the world of Anglo-Saxon closed structures.
At the same time, in recent years the situation has begun to change. The rise of Germany is accompanied by a number of moments, many of which are unlikely to make us, and other peoples of Europe, happy. First of all, this is a softening of attitudes towards Hitler in Europe and the United States. At the same time, the demonization of Stalin, communism, and the USSR is intensifying. They are trying to present the Soviet regime as more criminal than the Nazi regime.
In October 2010, the exhibition “Hitler and the Germans” opened at the German Historical Museum in Berlin with the subtitle: “Hitler as the embodiment of the people's ideal of saving the nation.” Since 2004, the UN has voted every year on a document on the inadmissibility of xenophobia. The document specifically emphasizes: the glorification of Nazism is unacceptable. In 2011, 17 EU countries voted against this document. It turns out that it is possible to glorify Nazism.
A quotation book from Mein Kampf is due to be published in Germany this year. And in a few years, Mein Kampf itself will be republished. German publishers claim that the book was not released only because of the copyright situation. As soon as 70 years have passed since Hitler's death, his book can be republished.
– In the bestseller “Germany: Self-Liquidation” T. Sarrazin paints a completely different future for Germany.
- And he draws correctly. The German rise has a serious contradiction - between economic and political achievements, on the one hand, and the quality of human material, on the other. The number of Germans is declining: by the middle of the 21st century, instead of 82 million, there will be 59 of them, and a large percentage will be Turks, Kurds, and Arabs.
Another aspect is quality. According to surveys, 40% of German men want to be housewives, 30% consider starting a family “an excessive responsibility.” With such material, not only the Reich - you can’t build anything at all. Ironically, or, as Hegel would say, the insidiousness of history, the Nazi international (Fourth Reich) spent the entire second half working on biomass, which does not need any Fifth Reich. And the ethnic composition of today's Germany would simply shock them. I just want to ask: “Is this what you fought for, old man Martin?”
And yet: if Europe is destined to rise and turn from a colossus with feet of clay into a real colossus, then only the Germans can do this.