Positive conclusion of state expertise. Examination of project documentation: what it is and with what it is eaten

- The most important document accompanying the procedure for the official design of construction at the initial stage. Consider comprehensively questions regarding this topic.

What is the state examination of project documentation?

Construction is a complex and cost-effective process that requires careful calculations (both the technical plan and material). That is why any construction begins not from bookmarking the foundation, but from the development of the project.

Project documentation is a set of text documents, schemes and cartographic materials necessary to determine the architectural, functional and technological, constructive and engineering characteristics of the planned construction object. However, it is not enough to develop project documentation. It is necessary that the formed project work will be evaluated by specialists. For this, project documentation is rented for examination.

Examination of project documentation (it can be carried out as a state organization and non-state) is a set of research on the developed project to determine its compliance with current legislative and technical standards and requirements. During the examination can be identified:

significant violations of the norms of existing legislation;
violations that can cause loss of strength and destruction of the structure;
disorders potentially dangerous emergency situations.
In addition, the necessary and preceding the actual start of construction of the planned object by step is the preparation and receipt:
project documentation;
positive expertise;
construction permits.

Thus, the purpose of the examination consists not only in identifying errors and inconsistencies allowed when designing errors, but also in obtaining a favorable conclusion required to obtain a construction permit.

What is the result of the examination of project documentation (and state, and non-state)?

According to the results of the expert analysis of project documentation, a conclusion is issued, which contains one of the conclusions:

The documentation complies with the existing requirements, regulations and regulations (this conclusion is about positive conclusion examination of project documentation).
Documentation does not meet the necessary requirements and standards (such a conclusion will be negative).

Issues related to the examination of project documentation, including the procedure for issuing a conclusion on the results of research, are quite detailed in the legislation. To regulatory acts regulating this area of \u200b\u200bconstruction include:

Urban planning code of the Russian Federation;
Government Decision "On Approval of the Regulation on the Organization and Conducting Non-State Examination of Project Documentation ..." of March 31, 2012 No. 272;
Government Decision "On the procedure for organizing and conducting a state examination of project documentation ..." of March 5, 2007 No. 145;
Order of the Ministry of Pressure of Russia "On approval of the requirements for the composition, maintenance and procedure for issuing the conclusion of the state examination of project documentation ..." of December 9, 2015 No. 887 / PR.

In this regard, special attention is paid to the rules for making a conclusion: in form and content, it must comply with the rules established by the legislation.

Form and content of the expertise

Conclusion is a paper or electronic document. At the same time, both positive and the negative results of expert work provides for the same form. These conclusions differ only by text on the title page, where the name includes both results: "Positive (negative) conclusion of the examination" (the unclaimed version is stricged).

The examination consists of such sections:

General.
Grounds for developing project documentation.
Description of the materials considered.
Conclusions.

Conclusions - this is why expertise is carried out. It is indicated that the project documentation established by the established standards and requirements or not. In this case, each summary of inconsistencies should be argued by references to regulatory documents.

The conclusion is not allowed to blots, advertising, any other corrections or damage to the text that do not clearly understand the result of expert work. Conclusion in paper should consist of the numbered sheets stitched among themselves and be a certified seal of the organization conducted by expertise. In electronic form, the document is formed in PDF format.

Conclusion Signs by experts indicating:

surnames, name, patronymic;
posts;
directions on a qualifying certificate;
the project documentation section for which the expert prepared.

Approves the document head of the expert organization. If the conclusion is prepared in electronic form, it is approved by an increased qualified electronic signature of the head. The title page of the conclusion is drawn up in accordance with the sample - annex to order No. 887 / PR.

How to increase the chances of receiving a positive conclusion?

In order to end up becoming owner positive conclusion of project documentation examination, you must first come up with all seriousness to develop this documentation. The city planning code determines that the developer itself can prepare the project documentation, or by him, on the basis of the contract, the Contractor. At the same time, paragraph 4 of Art. The 48 Code establishes that the types of work in the development of project documentation affecting the safety of facilities of captions should be carried out only by the IP or legal entities committed to such work (this is confirmed by a special testimony). If the developer is not confident in the competence of its specialists, the preparation of project documentation is better to entrust professionals providing similar services.

The next step towards getting a positive expert opinion is a choice of an institution that will conduct an examination. Legislation, with the exception of a small number of cases, when only GosExpertiz is allowed, leaves the customer the right to choose an expert institution and the type of examination.

If the choice falls on a non-governmental institution that suggests expert work, it is necessary to check the availability of accreditation from the organization to conduct an examination. Accreditation is confirmed by the relevant evidence issued by the Federal Accreditation Service (Rosaccreditation), as well as the availability of these expert institutions in the register of accredited organizations. Information from the registry can be obtained on the RosacCreditation website at: http://fsa.gov.ru/.

What if the expertise is negative?

If the resulting results of the examination, despite all the efforts attached to the preparation of project documentation, turned out to be negative, there are several options to correct the situation:

With the help of lawyers, make a statement of claim and apply to the court, trying to challenge the results of the examination. It should be understood that this option contains 2 negative points:
- the duration and cost of the trial;
- the lack of guarantees of obtaining a court decision in favor of the plaintiff developer.
Contact specialists and finalize project documentation in accordance with the comments of experts. The only negative moment of this option is the additional costs of the services of professionals on the revision of project documentation.
To appeal against the conclusion of experts in the Ministry of Regional Development in the manner approved by the Order of the Ministry of Regional Development of Russia of March 23, 2012 No. 126. According to this document, it is possible to file a complaint to the result of expert research projects within 3 years since the approval of the conclusion. In response to a complaint, the ministry organize an expert commission from 5 specialists, which within 30 days (or 60 in case of extending the term of consideration) must be taken by one of the solutions:
- on confirmation of expert opinion;
- unconfirmation of expert opinion.

The decision of the expert committee is mandatory for an expert organization who issued a controversial conclusion.

As you can see, to obtain a positive expert opinion on project documents, it is necessary not only to conduct serious and responsible preparatory work, but also to calculate the procedure for further action to protect their rights and interests (in case, the result of the work of the expert organization will be a negative conclusion).

The main image of the article

Greetings, friends! Today, the blog will begin a new heading on the topic "Examination of project documentation". I ask you to answer in the comments? Are you interested in this topic and whether it is worth affecting it on the blog. For me it is necessary, but still I want to know the opinion of my readers.

From this article you will learn:

What is the expertise of project documentation
What is regulated by the passage of expertise
What projects are being examined in respect of what projects
What is the difference between state expertise from non-state
Terms of passage of expertise

Honestly, before I came to work in the inspection of the GSN, I had no idea what the expertise of project documentation was. I think many masters and pro-paper, even engineers of OX and PTO, do not know what it is. So let's start learning.

Examination of project documentation - this is an assessment of the compliance of project documentation with the requirements of technical regulations, including sanitary and epidemiological, environmental requirements, the requirements of state protection of cultural heritage facilities, the requirements of fire, industrial, nuclear, radiation and other security, as well as the results of engineering surveys, and an assessment of the compliance of engineering results Exquisites for technical regulations.

Pretty Mouorred definition, if in simple, then the examination is when certified experts check the project documentation for compliance with the requirements of legislation.

Friends, law, namely the Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation, established that project documentation is subject to mandatory examination. But this is not always, but we will talk about it just below.

That is, after drawing up the project, you need to pass an examination and only after receiving a positive conclusion, you can approve the project for construction or to reconstruction.

The presence of access to the project organization is not all, it is necessary that the project has passed the examination. This is very important, friends, since without this conclusion you will not be given permission to build.

It should be noted that not only project documentation is subject to expertise, as well as engineering surveys, on the basis of which the project has been developed.

What is regulated?

The master studies the project

About the examination is written in detail in Article 49 of the GRK of the Russian Federation and in the "Regulation on the organization and conduct of the state examination of project documentation and engineering research results", approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of March 05, 2007 No. 145.

Sample of the finished sentence of expertise

Below, I prepared a sample of the finished positive conclusion of the examination of project documentation so that you have a certain presentation.

What projects are being examined in respect of what projects

It is easier to say for what examination projects is not conducted. And which projects are not subject to mandatory examination specified in Part 2, 2.1, 3, 3.1 of Art. 49 GRK of the Russian Federation.

And all the others should necessarily undergo an examination, otherwise it will be a serious violation of urban planning legislation.

Friends, do not be lazy to get acquainted with 49 articles and specified in parts of this article. So how to describe on the blog everything written does not make sense.

Well, briefly examination does not pass projects:

Here you should know that there are some more subtleties:

If the construction, the reconstruction of the above objects is carried out within the borders of the security zones of pipe transport facilities, then the examination is required.

And one more subtlety:

What is the difference between state expertise from non-state?

Previously, there was no such difference - there was only a state examination. I will tell you a secret - the order in the examination was much more.

But at the top they decided that to accelerate the process, it is necessary to resolve both non-state examination. And now the developer has the right to send project documentation for state expertise and non-state. This is indicated in Part 3.3 of Art. 49 GRK RF:

Exposure from the Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation Part 3.3 of Art. 49 GRK RF.

But at the same time it is necessary to know that in some cases the project examination can be passed only by the state. This is indicated in h. 3.4 GRK RF:

Exposure from the Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation Part 3.4 of Art. 49 GRK RF.

So what is the difference?

And the differences are that the state expertise can be passed only at the location of the land plot on which you are going to build. That is, we decided to build a state examination in Chuvashia in Chuvashia, we decided in Tatarstan - go through Tatarstan. All clear? If not, ask questions in the comments.

In this you can see from Part 4.2 GRK RF:

Exposure from the town-planning code of the Russian Federation Part 4.2 of Art. 49 GRK RF.

But the non-state can be held in any region of the Russian Federation.

Well, the most important difference between these two expertise is that the price is established by the state for state expertise. And below this price, the examination cannot be carried out.

Here it lies the whole charm of non-state examination for developers as its value is almost always lower.

I do not know the exact difference in value, but somehow one developer said me that for certain reasons I had to pass a state expertise and it was 480,000 rubles for him, while Non-state ready was to conduct an examination for 180,000 rubles. I think the price order is clear.

And very often it happens that in non-state examination work is much faster and atmosphere, too, more pleasant. All the same, a commercial organization must withstand competition, and no one has canceled the service.

Timing

The timing of the passage of state examination was established in part 7 of Art. 49 GRK of the Russian Federation and it should not exceed sixty days.

Exposure from the town-planning code of the Russian Federation Part 7 of Art. 49 GRK RF.

Non-state usually always works faster. Competition Do not want to sleep.

Previously, the period of passage of expertise was 90 days and only state. Imagine how long. And for the rent of land you have to pay, the money is dripping.

Friends, I only superficially considered the question of the examination of project documentation and engineering surveys. I advise you to carefully familiarize yourself with the 49 articles of the City Planning Code, where everything is written in detail. In fact, there are a lot of subtleties. Well, if you have questions, let's feel free to ask them in the comments.

Free download:

P.P.S. Friends, I want to recommend "Generator and equipping documentation - Generator-ID "from Ispolnitelnaya.com . The program is so simple and effective that I will save a bunch of time. I advise everyone to get acquainted !!!

Ministry of Construction and Housing and Communal Services of the Russian Federation

On approval of the requirements for the composition, maintenance and procedure for issuing the conclusion of the state examination of project documentation and (or) the results of engineering surveys

In accordance with clause 37 of the Regulation on the organization and conduct of the State Examination of Project Documentation and the results of engineering surveys, approved by Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of March 5, 2007 N 145 (Meeting of the legislation of the Russian Federation, 2007, N 11, Article 1336; 2008, n 47, Art. 5481; 2013, N 39, Article 4992; 2014, N 13, Article 1479; 2018, N 13, Article 1779), subparagraph 5.2.21 of paragraph 5 of the Regulations on the Ministry of Construction and Housing and Communal Services of the Russian Federation, approved by Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of November 18, 2013 N 1038 (Meeting of the legislation of the Russian Federation, 2013, N 47, Article 6117; 2014, N 12, Article 1246; N 40, Article 5426; N 50, .7100; 2015, N 2, Article 491; N 4, Article.660; N 23, Article 3334; N 24, Article 3479; N 46, Article 6393; N 47, Article 6586, Article 6601 ; 2016, N 2, Article.376; N 41, Article.5837; N 47, Article.6673; N 48, Article.6766; N 50, Article.7112; 2017, N 1, Article 185; N 8, Article 1245; N 32, Article.5078; N 33, Article 5200; N 49, Article 7468; N 52, Art. 8137; 2018, N 24, 3537),

order:

1. To approve in accordance with the annex to this order.

2. To recognize the order of the Ministry of Construction and Housing and Communal Services of the Russian Federation of December 9, 2015 N 887 / Pr "On approval of the requirements for the composition, maintenance and procedure for issuing a state examination of project documentation and (or) engineering research results" ( Registered by the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on December 29, 2015, registration N 40333).

3. Control over the execution of this order shall be entrusted to the Deputy Minister of Construction and Housing and Communal Services of the Russian Federation HD Mavlia.

V.V. Yakushev

Registered

in the Ministry of Justice

Russian Federation

registration N 51946.

Requirements for the composition, content and procedure for issuing the conclusion of the state examination of project documentation and (or) results of engineering surveys

Approved

order of the Ministry of Construction

and housing and communal services

Russian Federation

Requirements for the composition, content and procedure for issuing the conclusion of the state examination of project documentation and (or) results of engineering surveys

1. These requirements for the composition, content and procedure for issuing the conclusion of the state examination of project documentation and (or) the results of engineering research (hereinafter referred to as the requirements) determine the requirements for the composition, content and procedure for making the conclusion of the state examination of project documentation and (or) the results of engineering surveys in relations of capital construction objects referred to in parts 1 and 2.1 of Article 49 of the Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation (meeting of the legislation of the Russian Federation, 2005, N 1, Article 16; 2006, N 1, Article 21; No. 52, Article 5498; 2007, N 31, Article 4012; N 50, Article.6237; 2008, N 20, Article 2260; N 30, Article 3604; 2009, N 1, Article 17; 2011, N 30, Art.4591, 4594, 4605; N 49, Article 7015; 2013, N 27, Article 3480; 2014, N 26, Article.3387; N 43, Art. 5799, 2015, N 1, Art.11, 86; 2016, N 1, Article 22; N 27, Article 4301; 2017, N 31, Article 4740; 2018, N 1, 91; N 18, Article 2559), as well as project documentation prepared for the overhaul of roads in general use (hereinafter referred to as an examination).

2. When submitting the applicant's documents in electronic form to conduct an examination, the examination conclusion is made in the form of an electronic document in PDF format, as well as in the form of a paper document, if provided for in a statement and (or) contract.

If the examination documents are presented on paper, the examination conclusion is drawn up on a paper carrier.

3. Requirements for the composition, content and procedure for registration of the conclusion of expertise are established in relation to the following objects of expertise:

1) the results of engineering surveys;

2) project documentation;

3) Project documentation and engineering surveys.

4. The conclusion of the examination must contain a title list, as well as the following sections:

1) general provisions and information on the conclusion of expertise;

2) information contained in the documents submitted for the examination of project documentation;

3) information contained in the documents submitted for the examination of the results of engineering surveys;

4) a description of the discussed documentation (materials);

5) conclusions based on the results of consideration.

5. The title list of examination should contain the following information:

1) the number of examination;

2) information about the approval of the conclusion of expertise (position, surname, name, patronymic (late in the presence of) and the signature of the person who approved the conclusion of the examination, the date of such an approval, the provincial organization for the conduct of expertise);

3) the result of the examination carried out (positive or negative conclusion of expertise);

4) information about the object of examination (object of expertise, the name of the object of examination in accordance with the project documentation, the report on the results of engineering surveys).

6. With regard to expert opinion, information about which is subject to inclusion in the Unified State Register of Expertise Expertise Project Documentation of Capital Construction Objects (hereinafter referred to as the Register) in accordance with paragraphs 7 and 16 of the rules for the formation of a single state register of the examination of project documentation of capital construction projects approved by the Resolution Government of the Russian Federation dated July 24, 2017 N 878 "On the procedure for the formation of a single state register of conclusions of the examination of project documentation of capital construction objects and amendments to the Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation of March 5, 2007 N 145" (Meeting of the Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2017, N 32, Article.5068; 2018, N 1, Article.365), the detention number of the examination specified in subparagraph 1 of paragraph 5 of the requirements is assigned by the registry operator when inclusion of information about the examination in the registry.

The text of the examination prepared in the form of an electronic document, an examination organization, this graph is not included, and the number of examination is assigned by the registry operator by the formation of an electronic document. The text of the examination of an examination prepared as an electronic document signed by the strengthened qualified electronic signatures of experts and approved by the Head of the Organization for Expertise (either by an official authorized by the authority), and assigned to it, when incorporated into the registry, the review number of expertise is combined by forming an electronic document in XML format signed by a strengthened by a qualified electronic signature of the operator. At the same time, in the case of issuing an examination of the examination, as a document on paper (if it is provided for in a statement and (or) agreement on the conduct of state expertise), this graph in the text of the examination of the expertise is to be completed by the expert organization on the basis of information about the number of expertise incorporated in an electronic document.

7. In the conclusion of expertise, information about which is not subject to inclusion in the registry, the number of examination is issued by Arabic figures and has the following structure:

a) In the first two squares, the number of the constituent entity of the Russian Federation is indicated in the territory of which it is planned to build (reconstruct); the object of capital construction is planned (the number of subjects of the Russian Federation is indicated in accordance with the annex to the procedure for conducting a single state register of the examination of the project documentation of capital construction facilities and the provision of contained In it, information and documents approved by the order of the Ministry of Construction of Russia of February 22, 2018 N 115 / PR (registered in the Ministry of Justice of Russia on March 26, 2018, registration N 50499). In the event that the object is located on the territory of two or more subjects of the Russian Federation , the number "00" is specified;

b) in the fourth square indicates the form of examination (under state examination, the figure "1" is affixed, with a non-state examination - a number "2");

c) in the sixth square indicates the result of the examination (with a positive conclusion, the figure "1" is affixed, with a negative conclusion - the number 2 "(in the cases specified in subparagraph" b "of clause 34 of the Regulation on the organization and conduct of the State Examination of Project Documentation and Engineering Results Reviews approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of March 5, 2007 N 145 (Meeting of the legislation of the Russian Federation, 2007, N 11, Article 1336; 2013, N 17, 1958; 2018, N 13, Article 1779) (hereinafter - about the organization and conduct of state expertise), or a number "3" (in cases indicated in subparagraphs "A" and "in" clause 34 of the Regulation on the organization and conduct of state expertise);

d) in the eighth square indicate information about the object of expertise (the results of engineering surveys - the figure "1", the project documentation - the figure "2", the project documentation and the results of engineering surveys - the figure "3");

e) in the tenth - thirteenth squares - the sequence number of the issued conclusion (numbers are affixed, starting with the extreme right square, while the number 0 "is affixed in the remaining squares. The number of the conclusions is carried out consistently, after the current calendar year is reset, the numbering occurs after the current calendar year. starts from the number "0001");

e) in the fifteenth and sixteenth squares - the last two digits of the year of issuing a conclusion.

8. The "General" section of the Expertise Includes the following information:

1) information about the organization for examination;

2) information about the applicant, developer, technical customer;

3) grounds for conducting examination (details of the statement and an agreement on examination);

4) information about the conclusion of state environmental impact assessment (number and date of issuance of a conclusion, the body (organization) approved by the conclusion (indicated in relation to the objects for which the state environmental impact assessment is provided);

5) information on the composition of the documents submitted for the examination (a list of documents submitted by the applicant for examination).

9. Section "The information contained in the documents submitted for the examination of project documentation" includes:

1) Subsection "Information about the object of capital construction, in relation to which project documentation has been prepared" containing the following information (fills in accordance with the project documentation):

information about the name of the capital construction object, its postal (construction) address or location (in the location of the capital construction object within the territory of the Russian Federation, the subject (subjects) of the Russian Federation, the municipal district (municipal regions), is indicated in the territory of which (which) Relevant engineering surveys. In case of the location of the capital construction object outside the territory of the Russian Federation, including in the inner sea waters, the territorial seas and the adjacent zone of the Russian Federation, in the exclusive economic zone of the Russian Federation, within the borders of the Russian part (Russian sector) of the Caspian Sea and the continental shelf of the Russian Federation, the address (location) is indicated in accordance with the information contained in the project documentation);

information about the functional purpose of the capital construction object;

information on the technical and economic indicators of the object of capital construction;

2) information about buildings (facilities), which are part of a complex object in relation to which project documentation has been prepared (filled in the case of preparing the conclusion of expertise on project documentation prepared in relation to a complex object (an object that is part of the property complex). Consistently indicated Name, postal (construction) address (location), functional purpose and projected technical and economic indicators of each building (facilities) in accordance with the project documentation. In the case of the object of capital construction within the borders of the territory of the Russian Federation, the subject (subjects) of the Russian Federation is indicated, The municipal area (municipal regions), in whose territory (which) was carried out by relevant engineering surveys. In the case of the location of the capital construction outside the territory of the Russian Federation, including in the inner sea waters, territorial Om Sea and the adjacent zone of the Russian Federation, in the exclusive economic zone of the Russian Federation, within the borders of the Russian part (Russian sector), the bottom of the Caspian Sea and the Continental Shelf of the Russian Federation, the address (location) is indicated in accordance with the information contained in the project documentation);

3) information about the source (sources) and the amount of financing construction, reconstruction, overhaul of the capital construction facility (if financing works are supposed to be carried out in whole or in part at the expense of the budgets of the budget system of the Russian Federation, the corresponding level of the budget system of the Russian Federation is indicated in accordance with the article 10 of the Budget Code of the Russian Federation (meeting of the legislation of the Russian Federation, 1998, N 31, Article.3823; 2007, N 18, Article 2117; 2014, N 43, Article.5795, N 48, Article.6664; 2018, N 24, Article 3409); if the financing of works is supposed to be carried out in a whole or in part at the expense of legal entities established by the Russian Federation, the subject of the Russian Federation, the municipal education, legal entities, the share in the statutory (share) capital of which of the Russian Federation, the subject of the Russian Federation, Municipality is more than 50 percent, indicated A legal entity. The share of funding is also indicated at the expense of the budgets of the budget system of the Russian Federation, as well as funds of legal entities established by the Russian Federation, the subject of the Russian Federation, the municipal education, legal entities, the share in the statutory (share) capital of which of the Russian Federation, the subject of the Russian Federation, the municipality is more than 50 percent, as a percentage of the full cost of the project);

4) Information on the natural and technological conditions of the territory on which construction is planned to be carried out, reconstruction, overhaul of the capital construction facility (natural conditions are indicated (including climate district and subarea, wind area, snow area, intensity of seismic impacts, engineering and geological conditions ) and man-made conditions for the territory on which construction is expected to carry out the reconstruction of the object of capital construction, indicating the availability of distribution and manifestation of geological and engineering and geological processes (Cars, Lake processes, Sili, recycling of the banks, lakes, seas and reservoirs, flooding worked territories, seismic areas), as well as technogenic impact. If the project documentation has been prepared for the object of capital construction, the construction (reconstruction) of which is supposed to be carried out partly or completely outside the territory of Russia Federation, including in the inner sea waters, the territorial seas and the adjacent zone of the Russian Federation, in the exclusive economic zone of the Russian Federation, within the borders of the Russian part (Russian sector), the bottom of the Caspian Sea and the Continental Shelf of the Russian Federation, the natural conditions of the territory are indicated in accordance with information contained in the project documentation);

5) information about the estimated cost of construction, reconstruction, overhaul of the capital construction object (indicated if there is a section of the section "Estimation for the construction of capital construction facilities" in accordance with paragraph 7 of the provisions on the composition of the section of project documentation and requirements for their content approved by the Resolution Government of the Russian Federation of February 16, 2008 N 87 "On the composition of the sections of project documentation and requirements for their content" (meeting of the legislation of the Russian Federation, 2008, N 8, Article.744; 2010, N 16, Article 1920; 2018, n 18, Article 2630);

6) information about individual entrepreneurs and (or) legal entities prepared project documentation (indicated in relation to all legal entities and (or) individual entrepreneurs who participated in the preparation of project documentation (sections, subsections, parts of project documentation);

7) use information on the preparation of project documentation of the project documentation of reuse, including cost-effective reuse project documentation (indicate the date and number of the detention of an examination issued on the used project documentation);

8) information about the task of the developer (technical customer) to develop project documentation (the details of the design tasks are indicated (the name of the body (organization), which issued the document, the date, number (if available) in the event that the project documentation was developed on the basis of the contract);

9) Information on the documentation for the planning of the territory, on the presence of permits for deviation from the limit parameters of permitted construction, the reconstruction of capital construction objects (indicates the details of the project planning project, the project of the territory, the city planning plan of the land plot, as well as permits to deviate from the limit parameters of permitted construction , reconstruction of capital construction facilities (body name (organization), issued a document, date, number);

10) Information on the technical conditions for connecting the object of capital construction to engineering and technical support networks (the details of the technical conditions are indicated (the name of the body (organization), which issued the document, date, number).

10. Section "The information contained in the documents submitted for the examination of engineering research results" is filled in the case of an examination of engineering surveys and includes the following information:

1) date of preparation of reporting documentation on the results of engineering surveys;

2) information about the types of engineering surveys (indicated for the main and special types of engineering surveys);

3) information about the location of the area (platforms, routes) of engineering surveys (with respect to engineering surveys conducted within the borders of the territory of the Russian Federation, the subject (subjects) of the Russian Federation, the municipal district (municipal regions), on whose territory is (which) relevant Engineering surveys. In the case of engineering research outside the territory of the Russian Federation, including in the inner sea waters, the territorial seas and the adjacent zone of the Russian Federation, in the exclusive economic zone of the Russian Federation, within the borders of the Russian part (Russian sector), the bottom of the Caspian Sea and Continental The Proposal of the Russian Federation, the location of the area (platforms, tracks) of engineering surveys is indicated in accordance with the information contained in the documents submitted to the examination of the results of engineering surveys);

4) information about the developer (technical customer), providing engineering surveys (indicated if the developer (technical customer), which ensured engineering surveys, is not a developer (technical customer), which provided the preparation of project documentation);

5) information about individual entrepreneurs and (or) legal entities who prepared a technical report on engineering research results (indicated in relation to each person who participated in the preparation of the technical report on the results of engineering surveys);

6) information about the task of the developer (technical customer) to perform engineering surveys (the details of the tasks for engineering surveys are indicated (the name of the body (organization) issued a task for the implementation of engineering surveys, the date, number (if available) in the event that engineering surveys were performed Based on the contract of the contract);

7) Information on the engineering research program (the details of engineering research programs are indicated (the name of the organization that issued the engineering survey program, the date, number (if available).

11. Section "Description of the considered documentation (materials)" includes:

1) Subsection "Description of engineering survey results" containing the following information:

the composition of the reporting materials on the results of engineering surveys (taking into account changes made during the examination);

information about the methods of engineering surveys;

information about the operational changes made by the applicant to the results of engineering surveys in the process of examination;

2) Subsection "Description of the technical part of the project documentation" containing the following information:

the composition of the project documentation (taking into account changes made during the examination);

description of the main decisions (activities) adopted in the project documentation;

information about the operational changes made by the applicant in the sections of the project documentation in the process of conducting examination.

12. The information specified in the second paragraph of subparagraph 1 and the second paragraph of sub-clause 2 of paragraph 11 of the requirements is indicated in accordance with the application from GOST R 21.1101-2013 "National Standard of the Russian Federation. Project documentation system for construction. Basic requirements for project and working documentation", commissioned by order of Rosstandart dated June 11, 2013 N 156-st (M., Starotanform, 2013).

13. The section "Conclusions on the results of consideration" includes:

1) conclusions on the compliance or inconsistency of the results of engineering surveys with the requirements of technical regulations;

2) conclusions regarding the technical part of the project documentation containing the following information:

indication of the results of engineering surveys, for compliance with the assessment of project documentation;

conclusions on the compliance or inconsistency of the technical part of the project documentation The results of engineering surveys and requirements of technical regulations (each conclusion on the discrepancy of the results of engineering surveys and the requirements of technical regulations should contain an indication of the section (and if necessary - subsection, part of the section, books, volumes) and sheet of project documentation , in respect of which the conclusion is concluded, a reference to a specific requirement of technical regulations, other regulatory legal act or regulations applied to ensure compliance with the requirements of technical regulations, and (or) the results of engineering surveys, the discrepancy of which was revealed during the examination (with an indication of the section, articles, paragraphs, paragraph of a regulatory legal act or regulatory document applied to ensure compliance with the requirements of technical regulations, or materials of engineering surveys);

3) general conclusions (indicate the final conclusion on the compliance or inconsistency of the project documentation and (or) the results of engineering surveys established by the established requirements);

4) information about the persons certified for the right to prepare the expertise's conclusions that have signed the conclusion of the examination (indicate the name, name, patronymic (latter if there is), the direction of activity and the position of person certified for the right to prepare expertise's conclusions (if the specified person is an employee of an expert organization, Prepared an examination conclusion), or the name and details of the document, which is the basis for attracting the specified person to prepare the conclusion of the examination. In the case of preparing the conclusion of an examination on paper, their own expert signatures are affixed).

14. The information specified in subparagraphs 1 and 2 of paragraph 8, subparagraphs 3 and 6 of paragraph 9, subparagraphs 4 and 5 of clause 10 of the requirements include the following data:

a) in relation to an individual - surname, name, patronymic (latter), insurance number of an individual personal account in a system of compulsory pension insurance, mailing address, email address (if available);

b) in relation to an individual entrepreneur - last name, first name, patronymic (latter), the main state registration number of the individual entrepreneur, the postal address, email address (if available);

c) in relation to a legal entity, government body, other state body, local government authority - the full name, the taxpayer identification number, the main state registration number, the code of the reason for registration, location and address, email address (if available).

15. The conclusion of the examination issued in relation to the materials specified in subparagraph 1 of clause 3 of the requirements should contain the information provided for in paragraphs 5, 8, paragraphs of the third and fourth subparagraph 1, subparagraphs 3 and 4 of paragraph 9, paragraph 10, subparagraph 1 of paragraph 11, subparagraphs 1, 3 and 4 of paragraph 13 of the requirements.

16. The conclusion of the examination issued for the materials specified in subparagraph 2 of clause 3 of the requirements should contain the information provided for in paragraphs 5, 8, 9, subparagraph 2 of paragraph 11, subparagraphs 2-4 of paragraph 13 of the requirements.

17. The conclusion of the examination issued in relation to the materials specified in subparagraph 3 of clause 3 of the requirements should contain the information provided for by the requirements in full.

18. The conclusion of the examination should be objective, reasonable and evidence. Conclusions must have an unambiguous interpretation and comply with the results of the examination.

19. The conclusion of the examination is prepared and signed by persons certified in accordance with Article 49.1 of the Town Planning Code of the Russian Federation (Meeting of the Legislation of the Russian Federation 2005, N 1, Article 16; 2011, N 49, Article 3477 ; 2017 No. 31 Article 4740; 2018, N 18, Article 2759) for the right to prepare the conclusions of the examination of project documentation and (or) the results of engineering surveys and participating in the conduct of expertise (hereinafter expected).

The conclusion of the examination prepared in the form of an electronic document is signed by experts using a strengthened qualified electronic signature.

In the conclusion of the examination prepared in the form of a document on paper, there should be no blots, advertisements, crossed words and other corrections, as well as damage.

The details of the examination prepared in the form of a paper on paper should be stitched (indicating the number of cross-linked pages), are numbered and fastened to the seal of an organization for examination. The personnel signatures of experts (indicating the initials and the surname) are affixed on the latest sheet of expertise.

20. The conclusion of the examination prepared in the form of an electronic document is approved by signing it by a strengthened by an electronic signature by the head of the organization for the conduct of expertise or an official authorized by the head.

The conclusion of the examination prepared in the form of a document on paper, is approved by signing by the head of the organization for the conduct of an examination or by an official authorized by the head and an affiliation of the press of the organization for the conduct of expertise.

Application. Positive (negative) Conclusion Examination

application

to the composition requirements, maintenance

and the procedure for making a conclusion

state expertise project

documentation and (or) results

Examination detention number


	"I argue"

	(Position, Full name, Signature, Printing)

	"___" ____________ 20____

Positive (negative) Conclusion Examination


Object expertise


Name of the object of examination


I.. General provisions and information about the conclusion of expertise

1.1. Information about the organization for expertise


1.2. Information about the applicant, developer, technical customer


1.3. Grounds for examination


1.4. Information about the conclusion of state environmental impact


1.5. Information about the composition of the documents submitted for the examination







II.. Information contained in the documents submitted for the examination of project documentation

2.1. Information about the object of capital construction, in relation to which project documentation has been prepared

2.1.1. Information about the name of the object of capital construction, its postal (construction) address or location


2.1.2. Information about the functional purpose of the object of capital construction


2.1.3. Information about the technical and economic indicators of the object of capital construction


2.2. Information about buildings (facilities) included in the complex object in relation to which project documentation has been prepared







2.3. Information about the source (sources) and the amount of the financing of construction, reconstruction, overhaul of the capital construction facility


2.4. Information about the natural and technological conditions of the territory on which construction is planned, reconstruction, overhaul of the capital construction facility


2.5. Information about the estimated cost of construction, reconstruction, overhaul of the capital construction facility


2.6. Information about individual entrepreneurs and (or) legal entities who prepared project documentation


2.7. For use in the preparation of project documentation for project documentation for reuse, including cost-effective reuse design documentation


2.8. Information about the task of the developer (technical customer) to develop project documentation


2.9. Information about the documentation for the planning of the territory, on the presence of permits for deviation from the limit parameters of permitted construction, the reconstruction of capital construction facilities


2.10. Information on the technical specifications of connecting the object of capital construction to engineering and technical support networks


III. Information contained in the documents submitted for the examination of the results of engineering surveys

3.1. Date of preparation of reporting documentation on the results of engineering surveys


3.2. Information about the types of engineering surveys


3.3. Information about the location of the area (platforms, routes) of engineering surveys


3.4. Information about the developer (technical customer), ensuring engineering surveys


3.5. Information about individual entrepreneurs and (or) legal entities who prepared a technical report on engineering survey results


3.6. Information about the task of the developer (technical customer) for engineering surveys


3.7. Information about the program of engineering surveys


IV. Description of the considered documentation (materials)

4.1. Description of engineering survey results

4.1.1. The composition of the reporting materials on the results of engineering surveys (taking into account changes made during the examination)

	Designation	Name	Note


4.1.2. Information about the methods of engineering surveys


4.1.3. Information about the operational changes made by the applicant in the results of engineering surveys in the process of examination


4.2. Description of the technical part of the project documentation

4.2.1. The composition of the project documentation (taking into account changes made during the examination)

	Designation	Name	Note


4.2.2. Description of the main decisions (activities) adopted in the project documentation







4.2.3. Information about the operational changes made by the applicant in the sections of the project documentation in the process of conducting examination


V.. Conclusions on the results of consideration

5.1. Conclusions on the conformity or inconsistency of the results of engineering surveys with the requirements of technical regulations


5.2. Conclusions regarding the technical part of the project documentation

5.2.1. An indication of the results of engineering surveys, for compliance with the assessment of project documentation


5.2.2. Conclusions on the compliance or inconsistency of the technical part of the project documentation by the results of engineering surveys and requirements of technical regulations


6. General conclusions


7. Information about persons certified for the right to prepare the examination of expertise signatories

Electronic document text

Send your good work in the knowledge base is simple. Use the form below

Students, graduate students, young scientists who use the knowledge base in their studies and work will be very grateful to you.

Posted on http://www.allbest.ru.

Introduction

State expertise is an important and effective method of public administration and control.

Under the expertise it is understood as an analysis, research, the result of which is the conclusion that meets the requirements of approved standards, norms and rules and states and states in the interests of society.

The main goal, the achievement of which contributes to the examination is to reduce the likelihood of non-optimal management decisions.

Unfortunately, there is no scientifically developed terminological dictionary in the field of expertise, uncertainty in terminology in many cases gives rise to interpretation problems. Expert activities are mixed with other activities and features performed. In our presentation of expertise, this is a type of professional activity related to the study of any object (problem) in order to increase the validity of the decisions made under conditions of partial uncertainty, contradictions or conflict with the presentation of a motivated conclusion. The functional personality of expertise to the process of making management decisions should be emphasized. The scientific relations of expert methods, the search nature of the examination plays an important role in the system of scientific decision-making.

State expertise is held in the field that is recognized as significant from the point of view of state and public interest and therefore requires special protective guarantees provided by the state. Especially the participation of experts in the development of priorities of socio-economic, scientific and technical and technological development, the distribution of taxpayers' funds for programs and projects of targeted research and innovative and technological activities in various fields of economics and life of society. As the practice of recent years has shown, expert councils are actively created in the authorities make it possible to attract (practically on a public basis) to comprehensively consider the problematic issues of the scientific and management elite of the country and specialists with great practical experience. This allows you to save significant budgetary funds and eliminates existing disagreements on any other issues.

Public significance of expert activities, which in many cases is carried out with the participation of civil servants, it seems, today almost no one disputes. It is important to develop appropriate scientific and methodical, information, as well as personnel provision, on which the effective organization of work depends.

State examination - legislatively established activities of authorized organizations (expert organizations) and individuals (experts), carried out on public ordering on a contractual basis and related to research, study, assessment of a certain object (subject of examination), as well as with the preparation and design of conclusions, recommendations (expert opinions) on the subject of expertise.

A multi-level expert service system is currently being formed: expert tips are created and operate in individual government agencies, in district management and information centers. Expert activity is considered as an important component of professional activities: expert functions are introduced into official duties of a number of specialists. Training programs for training experts are being developed and implemented.

1. The concept of state expertise

Expert activity refers to research activities. Expert conclusion and other results obtained during the implementation are the results of research activities.

The concept of "expert" intersects with the practical solution of the urgent tasks. A dictionary of foreign words defines an expert as a "knowledgeable person invited in controversial situations or difficult cases for examination." The legal encyclopedic dictionary, reflecting the specifics of the legal oblast, offers the following interpretation of the term "expert": "A person with special knowledge and an investigation authorities, a court and other state (for example, arbitration) and public (for example, an arbitration court) for examination authorities "

Expert assessment is a motivated expert judgment. Individual, group and collective expert assessments are possible. Individual estimates can be obtained by ranking, ball and pair estimates.

The expert system is an artificial intelligence system, which includes a knowledge base with a set of rules and output mechanisms, allowing the right to recognize the situation on the basis of the rules and the user-represented facts, to make a diagnosis to formulate a solution or give a recommendation to select action. Knowledge of experts are a source of database formation.

Expert conclusion - document, result of expert assessment.

The expert method is a complex of logical and mathematical procedures aimed at obtaining information from experts, its analysis and generalization to prepare and accept a competent decision. The essence of the method consists in conducting experts to analyze the problem with high-quality and quantifying the results of individual expert assessments.

Stages of expert assessment are interrelated procedures with which the expert method is implemented. The initial stage includes the definition of the goal and tasks to be resolved by experts, the responsibility measures and the rights of the Working Group, the timing of the examination, the selection of experts for the examination, the definition of their competence. The next stage is the most important final stage of the expert assessment, which provides the basis for a competent decision.

The examination situation is a situation where the subject is involved in the diagnosis (for example, the level of human mental development, the reasons for the deviationing behavior of the teenager, the state of the criminal at the time of the crime, professional suitability, etc.) is mandatory (forced) in an administrative request .

The status of the expert is a set of rights and obligations, the powers and responsibility of the expert.

The method of expert assessments has logically interrelated stages that are the main stages of the examination.

The initial stage (an examination organization) includes:

· Determination of the purpose and objectives of the examination, formulation of the problem.

· Determination of the measure of responsibility, rights and powers of the Working Group of Experts.

· Setting the timing of the examination.

· Selection of experts, formation of expert groups (if necessary, determining their competence).

The main stage of expertise is associated with data collection, research work and expert assessment, analysis of the available material. Examination technology, the use of a set of methods and evaluation criteria depends on the nature of the examination, the area of \u200b\u200bits application.

An expert assessment is the result of analytical activities, based on the ability to see and resolve contradictions, predict, foresee and find non-standard solutions.

The final stage of the examination is a survey of experts (individual or group; personal, full-time or correspondence; oral or written), document design (report, certificate, review, etc.), the adoption of an expert opinion is the basis for a competent management decision.

Another idea of \u200b\u200bthe sequence of expertise stages is possible. In connection with the design of a new experience, during the examination, the following steps are allocated and deployed:

Fixation of information about new experience;

Its phenomenal-conceptual reconstruction;

Construction of the original abstraction as a means of examination;

Specification of abstraction as a means of examination;

Specifying abstraction with subsequent control comparison of conceptual reconstruction with phenomenal procedural.

It is known that in each particular area of \u200b\u200bexpertise, there has its own specific tasks, methods, criteria, organization and conduct procedure. However, it is possible to distinguish between a number of common features that unite various special types of expertise and allow it to consider it as a sufficiently independent type of professional activity.

Expert activity can be carried out in the presence of three main components:

· Examination object;

· Customer examination;

· Expert.

State expertise is a kind of expert activity, where representatives of state bodies act as experts, and the examination process itself in accordance with regulatory acts is mandatory.

2. State expertise, its mandatory objects

To date, expert activities in the Russian Federation are governed by laws: on environmental examination, trade and industrial chambers in the Russian Federation, on appraisal activities, consumer protection, product certification and services, and so on.

But they do not solve the problem itself, because they cover only the narrow spheres of expert activities. At the same time, many questions remain unresolved. For example, who has the right to engage in expertise;

Three forms of existence of expertise are possible:

· State - the one, which is carried out by the state by the state in the authorities of inspection and certification;

· Public - performing consumer protection functions and is an examination appointed by public organizations;

· Independent - conducted by independent professional expert companies. An independent examination is not related to administratively and financially or with power structures, nor with manufacturers or sellers of goods, nor with supervisory authorities, with whom who could have an impact on its activities by virtue of interest in the results. Expert organizations must have any other, except expert and certification work as part of the statutory activities.

The creation of an extensive network of independent expert organizations will make it possible not only to significantly reduce the risk of errors, but also to avoid possible accusations of bias of decisions and corruption.

The distribution of powers between state and non-state expert organizations is a problem that requires permission. Currently there has been a tendency to create in each federal office of its specialized expert services. At the same time, each of the departments refuses to recognize the results of the examinations made outside the walls of his department. This leads to the fact that today any official becomes the main expert in one field of activity.

The difference between state and independent experts lies in the subject of expertise, and the difference between the estimated, judicial and environmental expertise is determined by the object of examination. Thus, both environmental and judicial, and evaluation examination may be under certain conditions state, independent or public.

Expert work is organized as follows. The manufacturing company or the supplier company who wished to participate in the competition or attracted to him (if the contest is closed), applies to the expert organization to conduct an examination of the quality of its products. The expert organization provides the participant in the competition all the necessary documents for familiarization. After that, the manufacturer concludes a contract with an expert organization and pays for the cost of examination.

Samples for conducting expertise are selected by the experts themselves with the participation of representatives of the enterprise. An expert organization leaves for storage control samples or samples so that in the future the company has no complaints about product quality estimates. The storage period of control samples corresponds to the warranty period.

Tests can be carried out in two stages: first directly from the manufacturer or supplier (if there are appropriate conditions for this), and then in the laboratory of the expert organization.

At the same time, experts also check the production itself, including basic and auxiliary technological processes, technical documentation, equipment, metrological support, the level of technical training of personnel, environmental issues and much more. According to the results of this work, an expert opinion is drawn up, on the basis of which the Competition Commission and takes the final decision.

We also define the legal problems of expert activities characteristic of the Russian Federation and for its subjects:

Regulatoryly not identified and the possibility of coordination of expert activities at different levels is not fixed.

A serious problem is an insufficient level of expert training, more precisely, special training. During the work of the expert, subjective qualities or features of its creators and experts play a significant role: personal experience, worldview, not only professional, but also the total culture, the ability to logically think, political priorities, even the mood and health status. On the one hand, you have to agree that it is inevitable. However, there are measures to reduce some negative consequences of the influence of the subjective factor.

First, it should be recognized that expert activities have its own characteristics and requires special knowledge. It means that criteria requirements for the expert, the necessary amount of knowledge, skills and skills should be determined.

Secondly, the experts must be appropriately selecting, and expert activities should be trained in the same way as today is taught evaluation, audit, anti-crisis management, given the corresponding certificate.

Thirdly, if a legal entity is attracted to the examination, then it apparently should have an appropriate license for the right to conduct an examination in a particular area, as well as a specially prepared employee who has the appropriate certificate.

Fourth, the examination procedure itself must be as unobed as possible and regulated.

The constituent entities of the Russian Federation need strengthened methodological and methodological assistance in the implementation and in the organization of expert activities. Developing theoretical and practical expertise issues, special training and certification of personnel experts, creating a special information database, offering regions model projects of various legal acts, such a center could make a significant contribution to improving expert activities in Russia. It should also be noted the problem of corruption in the field of public administration affecting both expert activities, for example, with the interest of obtaining a certain expert opinion or using officials of the expert bodies of the Administrative Resource.

The need for the scientific development of the quality criteria for examination is obvious. Violations of the procedure, legal equipment are often leading to negative legal and social consequences. The examination itself cannot exclude the wrong actions of the subject, but it can be more effective:

first, in the case of a clear regulatory consolidation of the examination procedure and the responsibility of the subject of expertise for ignoring its results;

secondly, in the case of a clear and uniform presentation in the subjects of expertise on the criteria for assessing the decision taken from the point of view of its quality.

The State Expertise of Russia conducts an examination of construction projects:

· Objects carried out at the expense of state capital investments, state loan;

· Objects carried out abroad with the technical assistance of the Russian Federation;

· Objects operating in conjunction with other states or with the attraction of foreign trade;

· Experimental and basic projects;

· Potentially dangerous and technically complex objects on the list, established by the Ministry of Emergency Situations and Emergencies Ministry.

In all cases, the Glavgosexpertiza of the Russian Federation gives a consolidated expert opinion with the participation of state environmental impact assessment and state examination of working conditions, taking into account their conclusions.

In addition, Glavgosexpertiza carries out selective control over the quality of construction projects.

There are organizations of state private expertise, which conduct the expertise of projects carried out at the expense of the budget of the edges, regions, republics, etc., and also conduct an examination of projects carried out on their territory, regardless of sources of financing of capital investments, types of property and accessories; Selective quality control of projects.

Construction projects are provided by the Customer in the State Expert Organ. Completeness of documents, their compliance according to the composition is checked by the expert body within five days, and the examination itself is carried out for no more than 45 days.

The main issues (specify depending on the sectoral specifics, special conditions and types of construction) to be inspected during the examination:

· Compliance of decisions made to substantiate investment;

· Availability of project coordination with interested organizations;

· Economic need and economic feasibility of the planned construction based on the social needs and competitiveness of the project;

· Justification of the enterprise's capacity based on the projected process solutions to the provision of raw materials, fuel and energy and other resources and on the basis of the need for a product being manufactured;

· Sufficiency and efficiency of technical solutions and environmental protection measures and to prevent emergency situations and eliminate their consequences;

· Ensuring the safety of the operation of buildings, structures and in general enterprises, compliance with the rules of explosive and fire safety;

· Compliance with norms and rules for labor protection, safety and sanitary requirements.

The list of questions is supplemented, as there are changes to the RDS 11-201-95 in No. 1 of 29.01.98:

· Sufficiency and efficiency of technological solutions for energy saving;

· The need to equip engineering systems for control, accounting and regulation of gas, water and heat;

· Accounting for additional requirements on the heat of enclosing structures;

· The optimality of accepted engineering solutions;

· The presence of waste-free (low-waste) production;

· Reliability of determining the cost of construction;

· Evaluation of investment efficiency.

According to the examination of construction projects, a consolidated comprehensive conclusion is given, which indicates:

· Brief characteristic of the source data;

· Terms of construction and main design solutions, as well as construction unit;

· Specific comments and suggestions or changes and additions made in the process of examination;

· General conclusions about the feasibility of investment;

The terms of consideration in the examination bodies corrected by its conclusions of the documentation should not exceed 30 days.

Compliance with the project is under the control of the guip or chief architect.

Currently, a package of documents on a new procedure for holding state examination and approval of urban planning, pre-project and project documentation is being worked out.

The construction distinguishes the expertise of engineering and technical and technical and economic.

Engineering and technical examinations include:

1. Expertise the quality of work performed is one of the most common types of expertise. Its purpose is to establish the actual level of quality of construction and installation and repair and finishing works, as well as a comparison of this level with the requirements of state and industry standards, design and estimate documentation and the customer. Like any other type of expertise, quality examination can be held at the request of any of the parties to the construction project or by decision of the competent state body: the court, the investigator, the prosecutor's office. All parties that are a party to controversial relations have the right to put their questions about the expert permit. In the case of the appointment of the expert by the court, the latter will independently form a list of issues in the final form. The expert has the right to formulate additional issues if they, in his opinion, will allow to get a more accurate result. The production of such Rada expertise is accompanied by the use of special measuring instruments, without which it is impossible to obtain accurate data.

Fixation of the volume of work. This type of examination is applied in the event of a dispute about the real volumes of work performed. By order of one of the parties, an independent expert organization conducts a visual inspection and detailed measurements of the object, in the necessary cases, the calculation of work volumes, which are then compared with design and estimate and executive documentation. As a result, the customer can be sure that his funds did not disappear. It should be noted that this type of examination is closely intertwined with the expertise of the quality of work done, as the work performed with the retreat from the required rules is not subject to payment.

Participation in the acceptance of both finished and in connection with the change of the customer. This type of expertise is in demand, as a rule, investors and managers. Determining the quality and scope of work performed may be required both in the preparation of an object to delivery and at intermediate stages, especially if we are talking about changing the contractor. Only fixing the real volumes at the time of changing the contractor you can be sure that in the future the disputes will not arise both with the old performer of work and with the new one. However, establish the truth, after some time, it will be almost impossible.

The survey of buildings, buildings and structures is a set of measures to monitor the technical condition of building structures and engineering networks. The examination of buildings and structures is carried out in order to assess the operational state of the facility and the decision on the need for the current, overhaul, reconstruction or modernization of the building. With the help of non-destructive testing methods, our company's specialists identify construction defects, evaluate the technical condition of building structures, determine the strength of the materials, their humidity, the wear of engineering communications, the quality of welds and many other parameters. Non-destructive testing methods used in the examination of buildings: ultrasound, radiation, thermal, visual, etc. According to the results of the building of the building, a technical conclusion is drawn up on the state of the object, indicating the recommendations developed by our engineers. If necessary, design solutions for strengthening structures, replace them and reconstruction. Surveys are carried out in strict accordance with the regulatory framework. The main regulatory and legal acts in the field of surveys are SP 13-102-2003 "Rules of examination of the supporting structures of buildings and structures", VSN 57-88 (p) "The Regulation on the Technical Survey of residential buildings" and many others.

The result of the work during surveys is to prepare the technical conclusion about the state of the object, which contains the obtained data and recommendations developed by engineers. Based on these recommendations, design solutions for strengthening structures, their replacement or reconstruction can be developed.

This service is especially in demand by property owners who wish to reconstruct or upgrade their property, change its functional purpose; investment companies in need of objective information on the state of building structures for the development of investment projects; Customers and general contractors for the development of project and technological solutions and many others.

The thermographic shooting can hardly be called an independent view of the examination, rather this auxiliary type of instrumental study that allows you to determine the presence of construction defects with high accuracy. The method is based on the fixation of thermal radiation with a special chamber - thermal imager. At the same time, the sections of the surveyed surface have different heating, and, accordingly, the different radiation intensity. In the image, the multi-heated areas are displayed in different colors, which allows you to determine the places, high humidity, thermal bridges, anomalous overheating zones and other defects. Interpretation of snapshots allows localizing defects for a subsequent detailed examination and reasons. The high resolution of the camera allows you to cover a large volume of the building in one shot.

Non-destructive testing is one of the types of research, which is often necessary in the manufacture of a particular examination. With the help of various methods of non-destructive testing (visual, thermal, acoustic), construction defects are identified, the technical condition of building structures is evaluated, determine the strength of materials, their humidity, engineering communications wear, weld quality and many other parameters affecting the safety and reliability of building structures .

The forensic examination is a collective concept for many types of expertise related to the need for special knowledge in the technical sphere. In my practice, we face situations when the judicial authorities in their definitions call the examination completely different terms. The name of the examination does not change its essence, which is aimed at establishing objective facts, the interpretation of which requires special knowledge. Examination, appointed by the definition of a court or other state body, differs from a simple examination with the need to clearly follow the procedural standards.

Engineering and construction expertise at the pre-trial stage may be necessary to fix evidence, for example, when there is a chance that further traces in which the actual data on the case can be established will be lost. Also, pre-trial examination may be needed to appeal to court in cases where the basis for presenting claims is not obvious and requires special knowledge. It should be noted that when ordering examination at the pre-trial stage there is a possibility of appointment in the future re-examination by definition of the court, since in pre-trial expertise there may be affected by all issues that require permits.

Expert assessment of the conclusions of independent technical expertise. A very specific type of expertise, which is to assess the facts and conclusions contained in the finished expert opinion. This species can be used to present counterproofs in court when evaluating evidence. It should be noted that this type of expertise is closely related to the concept of professional ethics of the expert. The critical assessment of foreign conclusions is a thin matter, which should not be used to harm or commercially motivated. The question of the possibility of expert assessment of someone else's expertise is considered in an individual order.

Technical and economic experts include:

1.Analysis design and estimate documentation. Expert research is closely related to the financial aspect of construction and are designed mainly on professional participants in the construction market. The PSD analysis is to determine the completeness of the documentation, based on the purposes of its purpose, the compliance of the projected design solutions to the estimated calculations, selective or continuously check estimate calculations. This type of examination allows the investor and / or customer to avoid overstating the estimated cost of construction. It can also be applied in terms of executive documentation when abuses are possible when closing stages of work.

Determination of the validity of the design solutions of the customer, including in the financial sector. This type of expertise is applied to establish the compliance of design solutions to the requirements of the customer. It can be applied in various volumes, that is, in terms of the use of certain materials in the project, in terms of the production of work in a certain way (for example, the gas laying through the barrier can be carried out in an open method, or closed (trenchless), which greatly increases the cost of CMR), in part The need to implement certain activities provided for by the project. In this case, the project analysis is designed to save the customer and compliance with the objectives delivered when designing.

Survey of real estate objects, fixing the state with the aim of opening investments, mortgages or insurance. Survey of real estate facilities in demand by insurance and credit institutions, investment companies that invest in real estate or secured by the latter.

A timely examination of the technical condition of the building or premises at the stage of preparation for a mortgage deal will help to avoid the customer of additional technical risks, will be convinced of the reliability and security of the property being laid. For insurance companies, accurate data on the technical condition of the building will help to more accurately calculate the insurance rate, reducing the risks.

Expert assessment of construction management documentation. This type of examination is more documentary and is to establish the completeness of the documentation for managing the construction project and the analysis of the content of this documentation. Such an event will help the customer to reduce the costs of the object of operation, since the initial and permits will be in perfect order.

The main problems of state expertise in construction:

1. One of the main problems facing construction experts is the inconsistency of regulatory documents. Each expert, as a specialist, chooses the scope of research and necessary documents. The spent techniques are only in the field of industrial safety, in all other experts, experts are forced to refer to fairly old documents, which long ago are no longer obligatory.

2. Classifications and competence of the experts themselves.

In state expertise, those specialists who have extensive experience of project work are mainly working. However, over time, many experts went to work in private non-state expert companies. The norms and criteria for assessing the experts themselves are still not installed.

The problem of the parallel existence of state and non-state examination. Currently there are more than 80 regional expertise bodies.

However, there is a non-state examination in construction, and in the process of its development, there are many issues. If earlier the expert bodies considered the main task to determine the feasibility of construction and economic substantiation, today the human security issues both inside the object and outside. Unfortunately, the full-fledged expert bodies, in which experts would be focused on a number of experts yet. Any body of expertise itself finds the way to conduct an examination for which directions. The Town Planning Code of the Russian Federation clearly states that a number of objects, especially low-rise housing and industrial facilities, which are no more than 1,500 sq.m., and up to two floors, are not subject to state expertise.

It is necessary for uniformity and methodological unity of the examination, regardless of its geography. Today we have no body that fully answered the methodological guidance. The state examination focuses only on particularly dangerous, especially important, unique objects. And therefore, the request from the field about the methodology simply does not consider. However, the faster we get methodological guidance, the faster we will stand on the rates of responsibility for the examination.

3. Stages of the State Examination

In accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation on the construction of the state expertise undergoes the following steps:

1 Stage - obtaining technical conditions:

On joining the supply sources;

On the intersection with engineering networks and communications;

Registration of acts of choice for placing objects with the passage of expertise on EIA, Rosprirodnadzor and Rospotrebnadzor;

Conducting public discussion, the formation of public opinion on the need to build an object.

Stage 2 - coordination of project documentation with all interested organizations, including on compliance with previously issued technical conditions and task for design.

3 Stage - Passage of State Examination of Project Documentation:

4 Stage - Providing the finished project documentation to the customer under the contract.

Checking documents for the possibility of conducting state expertise is carried out on time no later than 3 working days. At the specified period, the applicant is sent a state examination agreement, or a motivated refusal to adopt submitted documents.

According to the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of March 5, 2007, N 145 "On the procedure for organizing and conducting the state examination of project documentation and engineering research results" (as amended by the Decisions of the Government of the Russian Federation dated December 29, 2007 N 970, from 02/19/2008 N 87, from 07.11 .2008 N 821) To conduct a state examination of simultaneously project documentation and the results of engineering surveys, made to prepare such documentation, are provided:

a) a statement on the conduct of state expertise, indicating the identification information about the work of work, about the object of capital construction, about the developer and the applicant:

b) copies of shutdown documents for land;

c) a copy of the town planning plan;

d) project documentation for the object;

e) a copy of the design task;

e) the results of engineering surveys;

g) a copy of the task to perform engineering surveys;

h) documents confirming the applicant's powers to act on behalf of the developer, the customer (if the applicant is not a customer and (or) the developer).

The procedure for receiving documents for examination:

fill out a statement on the prescribed form;

Receive a resolution of the head of the State Construction Supervision and Examination Chief or Head of the Department of State Examination for the preliminary examination;

Fill out accounts (Card "Residential and Public Buildings and Constructions" and / or Card "Industrial and Communal Objects") on both sides in 2 copies and depend on the head of the estimated department;

Sign the "Runner" in the environment of environmental protection;

At the appointed time, submit the above documents, a certificate of fee, project documentation (PD) with the description and source-permits in the preliminary examination sector.

When re-passing PD for 14 calendar days for residential facilities after receiving a negative conclusion, it is necessary to submit:

statement of the developer for re-examination with the Visa Head of the State Building Supervision Service and Expertise or Head of the Department of State Examination;

inventory, handed over PD;

pD kit (according to the description for the appointment of a new number).

When re-passing the PD for 14 calendar days for non-residential facilities, it is necessary to submit an additional letter to the Customer with a request not to return PD, with a visa head of the Service of the State Construction Supervision and Expertise or Head of the Office of State Examination. New thing is not formed.

In other cases, the re-passing of the PD is carried out according to the regulations of the primary delivery of PD.

In the process of designing and building buildings and structures, the state supervision of compliance with the participants in the construction of established rules and compulsory requirements is carried out by about 25 state supervisory and control bodies, which can be divided into four main groups:

state examination authorities;

organs of state architectural and construction supervision;

state bodies to ensure certain types of safety (fire, sanitary and epidemiological, environmental, industrial, etc.) - special supervisory authorities;

state bodies for the protection of special objects (monuments of history, culture, etc.).

In the legislative regulation of state expertise, significant changes have occurred. The new town-planning code of 29.12.2004 N 190-FZ determines the procedure for its implementation. The state examination of project documentation and the state examination of engineering research results are carried out by the federal executive body, the executive authority of the constituent entity of the Russian Federation authorized to conduct a state examination of project documentation, or subordinated state-owned state (budgetary or autonomous) institutions.

The city planning code of the Russian Federation (part 5 of article 49) clearly defined the subject of the state examination of project documentation:

technical regulations (that is, reduced to the general document with the requirements of all types of safety - the sanitary and epidemiological, environmental, fire, industrial, nuclear, radiation and other types of safety);

the results of engineering surveys.

The Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation establishes the deadline for the state examination of project documentation, which should not exceed 90 days. In the case of the comments of the expert commission within 20 days, it is necessary to eliminate flaws.

The developer design documentation is needed in order to obtain a construction permit, build an object and, having received permission to operate the object, become the owner of the object and use it for his own needs or compensated for them in favor of others. The developer's intentions can only be implemented in the case when the project documentation meets all established requirements. The fact of the presence of such conformity is determined by the test. Therefore, the test documentation check is an action in which the developer is interested in the developer. Checking project documentation can be carried out by different subjects. Private persons can be inspected - developers, customers, project documentation developers attracted by private experts, as well as representatives of authorized public authorities - state examination bodies of project documentation.

At the moment, ten such bodies have been determined, which should be carried out by state expertise in accordance with various federal laws (the list of bodies is set forth in the sequence of these laws):

· Examination of the state fire supervision - in accordance with the Federal Law "On Fire Safety" dated December 21, 1994;

· State expertise in the field of public protection and territories from emergency situations - in accordance with the Federal Law "On the Protection of the Population and Territories from Emergency Situations of Natural and Technogenic Character" of 21.12.1994;

· State expertise of the safety of nuclear facilities - "On the use of atomic energy" of 21.11.1995;

· State environmental expertise - in accordance with the Federal Law "On Environmental Expertise" of 23.11.1995;

· State expertise of industrial safety - in accordance with the Federal Law "On Industrial Safety of hazardous production facilities" of 21.07.1997;

· State expertise of the safety of hydraulic structures - in accordance with the Federal Law "On Safety of Hydrotechnical Facilities" of 21.07.1997;

· State expertise of investment projects (state private expertise) - "On investment activities in the Russian Federation carried out in the form of capital investments" of 02.25.1999;

· Sanitary and epidemiological examination - in accordance with the Federal Law "On Sanitary and Epidemiological Welfare of the Population" of 03/30/1999;

· State expertise of labor protection conditions - in accordance with the Federal Law "On the Fundamentals of Labor Protection in the Russian Federation" of 07/17/1999;

· State historical and cultural examination - in accordance with the Federal Law "On the facilities of the cultural heritage (monuments of history and culture) of the Peoples of the Russian Federation" dated June 25, 2002

4. Conclusion of state expertise, re-examination

The state examination of projects is based on the principles of its independence, validity and objectivity of assessments and conclusions, as well as centralized responsibility of experts by post. The obligation to conduct a state examination is established by law depending on:

· Types of projects (pre-project, project or design and estimate documentation);

· Technical complexity of the future object associated with its functional purpose and technological processes planned (calculated) capacity (capacity, bandwidth), special conditions of the site (platforms, tracks) of construction, physical parameters and characteristics, etc.;

· Sources of investing planned intentions on urban-planning development of territories or construction of a specific object;

· Other special or specific requirements for project decisions in terms of providing sanitary, environmental, fire and explosive security, reliability of the designs and stability of the functioning of the projected objects.

The result of the state expertise is the conclusion of compliance (positive conclusion) or inconsistency (negative conclusion): project documentation with the requirements of technical regulations and the results of engineering surveys, if at the same time the state expertise of project documentation and engineering surveys were carried out.

The conclusion of state examination is signed by government experts participating in the examination, and is approved by the head of the Organization for the State Examination or an official authorized by such a leader.

Requirements for the composition, maintenance and procedure for issuing the conclusion of state expertise are established by the Federal Agency for Construction and Housing and Communal Services.

Project documentation cannot be approved by the developer or customer in the presence of a negative conclusion of the state examination of project documentation. The negative conclusion of state expertise may be disputed by the developer or customer in court.

The issuance of the results of the state examination is carried out by the applicant's hands or by sending a registered letter. Positive conclusion of state expertise is issued in four copies.

The provision provides for the obligation of the organization for the conduct of state expertise on maintaining the register of issued state expertise.

The information contained in the registry is open and is provided to any person within 10 days from the date of receipt by the Organization for the State Examination of the Written Request.

Self maintaining the registry and grant information is established by the Federal Agency for Construction and Housing and Communal Services, and at the moment is under development.

In case of loss of conclusion of state expertise, the applicant has the right to receive a duplicate of this conclusion in the organization for the state examination. Duplicate is issued for free within 10 days from the date of receipt of the specified written application organization.

Repeated examination is carried out after eliminating non-compliance specified in the negative conclusion of state expertise. Repeated examination is carried out an unlimited number of times, is carried out in general, taking into account the established duties.

The same set of documents is provided to the re-state examination as the primary one. Additionally, a certificate of corrective events is provided.

Construction and repair work must be constantly monitoring the project coordinator. In order for construction to be completed successfully, the object was set to the customer for a specified period, it is necessary to clearly comply with the project conditions and fulfill all the necessary rules. In other words, at all stages of construction and repair need author and technical supervision.

The author's supervision is introduced in order to ensure compliance of the solutions contained in the working documentation performed by construction and installation work on the facility. It is conducted by the project organization that fulfilled the project and working drawings, throughout the period of construction and commissioning of objects.

The author's supervision of the design organizations is carried out on the basis of an agreement concluded by the Customer with the project organization - the general designer for the entire period of construction of the facility. A plan-schedule is attached to the contract, cost estimates and a list of basic work, in the survey of which representatives of the author's supervision are involved.

The need for a copyright supervision is determined by the Customer and is set in the task of designing objects. The author's supervision is mandatory in the case when the need to exercise the author's supervisory is established by law.

According to the definition, the author's supervision is a set of activities carried out to ensure compliance of technological, architectural and stylistic, construction and other technical solutions and indicators of the object being commissioned and indicators provided for in the project documentation approved by the customer.

The author's supervision implies a planned (once a few days) to the object of the object to the coordinator to clarify the details of the project and making appropriate comments to the work of the work of work, as well as the solution of issues on project documentation arising from the Customer.

List of documents issued during the author's supervision

Plan graph.

Information about the persons responsible for conducting the author's supervision.

M12291 5200023SNIP 3.01.01-85 Organization of construction production;

Snip 3.01.04-87 Acceptance of the completed construction of facilities. Basic provisions.

In turn, the joint venture 11-110-99 contains regulatory references to the following standards:

GOST 2.105-95 ECCD. General requirements for text documents;

GOST 21.101-97 SPDS. Basic requirements for project and working documentation.

The contract is the main document regulating the relationship of the Parties establishing their rights and obligations to make the author's supervision in the contracting method of organizing the design.

The administrative document (order) is the main document for the implementation of the author's supervision in the construction of an object.

The author's supervision is carried out on the basis of an agreement (administrative document) and is carried out during the entire period of construction and commissioning of the object, and if necessary, and the initial period of its operation. The timing of work is established by the schedule attached to the Agreement and the Regulatory Document.

The head of the author's supervision professionals is appointed chief architect or chief project engineer.

The author of the author's supervision issues to those skilled in the task and coordinates their work on the management of the author's supervision at the facility. Specialists carrying out the author's supervision are traveled to the construction site for an intermediate acceptance of responsible structures and examination of hidden work within the timing provided for by the schedule, as well as on a special call to the Customer or Contractor in accordance with the contract (administrative document).

When making a copyright oversight of the construction of an object, a magazine is regularly conducted, which is compiled by the designer and is transmitted to the customer. Journal management is carried out both by the construction object as a whole and in its start-up complexes or individual buildings and structures. It must be numbered, laid, decorated with all signatures on the title page and is bonded by the customer's seal. The magazine is transmitted by the Customer to the Contractor and is located on the construction site before it is completed.

The magazine is filled with the head or specialists carrying out the author's supervision, the customer and the authorized person of the contractor. After graduating from construction, the Contractor transmits the magazine to the customer.

Each visit to the construction object by experts is registered in the journal. The record of the work done on the author's supervision is certified by signatures of responsible representatives of the customer and contractor. The recording is also performed in the absence of comments.

The basic rights of specialists are as follows:

access to all construction facilities and construction sites under construction;

familiarization with the necessary technical documentation relating to the construction object;

control over the implementation of the instructions listed in the journal;

making proposals to the authorities of the State Architectural and Construction Supervision and other bodies of architecture and urban planning on suspension in the necessary cases of construction and installation work carried out with identified violations, and take measures to prevent copyright to the work of architecture in accordance with the legislation.

Responsibilities of specialists:

· Selective verification of the compliance of manufactured construction and installation works of working documentation and requirements of construction standards and rules;

· Selective control over the quality and compliance with the production of work related to ensuring reliability, strength, stability and durability of structures and installation of technological and engineering equipment;

· Timely solution of issues related to the need to make changes to working documentation, and execution control;

· Promoting the familiarization of workers who carry out construction and installation work, and representatives of the Customer with project and working documentation;

Positive conclusion of state expertise. Examination of project documentation: what it is and with what it is eaten

What is the state examination of project documentation?

What is the result of the examination of project documentation (and state, and non-state)?

Form and content of the expertise

How to increase the chances of receiving a positive conclusion?

What if the expertise is negative?

What is regulated?

Sample of the finished sentence of expertise

What projects are being examined in respect of what projects

What is the difference between state expertise from non-state?

Timing

Requirements for the composition, content and procedure for issuing the conclusion of the state examination of project documentation and (or) results of engineering surveys

Application. Positive (negative) Conclusion Examination

Send your good work in the knowledge base is simple. Use the form below

Similar documents