Does God actually exist proof. Scientists who tried to scientifically prove the existence of God

An absolute shock to the scientific world was the speech of the famous philosophy professor Anthony Flew. Under the pressure of indisputable facts, the scientist admitted that atheism is a clear delusion

The scientist, who would be well over 80 today, was one of the pillars of scientific atheism for many years. For decades, Flue has been publishing books and giving lectures based on the thesis that faith in the Almighty is unjustified, the Meta portal writes.
However, since 2004 the series scientific discoveries forced the great defender of atheism to change his views. Flue publicly stated that he was wrong, and the universe could not have arisen on its own - it was obviously created by someone more powerful than we can imagine.

According to Flue, earlier he, like other atheists, was convinced that once upon a time, the first living matter simply appeared from dead matter. “Today, it is impossible to imagine the construction of an atheistic theory of the origin of life and the appearance of the first organism of reproduction,” Flue says.

According to the scientist, modern data on the structure of the DNA molecule irrefutably indicate that it could not have arisen on its own, but is someone's development. Genetic code and the literally encyclopedic volumes of information that the molecule stores in itself refute the possibility of a blind coincidence.

Miraculous creation

Internet blew up the revelation of the famous British scientist Anthony Flew (Antony Garrard Newton Flew), with whom he spoke, renouncing his - atheistic - faith. It happened back in 2004, when Flue turned 81:

My erroneous views have undoubtedly influenced the worldview of many people, and I want to correct the enormous harm that I, apparently, caused them, - said the scientist, who had previously enthusiastically and vehemently read atheistic lectures in various higher educational institutions.

The other day, Flue's revelation of almost a decade ago surfaced through the efforts of bloggers. And it provoked an enthusiastic response from many. Which is not surprising for those who were not with him - a revelation - familiar. When famous people, and even more so atheists agree that God exists, this is shocking. Makes me want to understand why.

Here is what Anthony Flew himself explained at the time:

The biological study of DNA has shown that a truly incredible combination of many different factors is required for the emergence of life, and this, of course, leads to the conclusion that someone who is able to create is involved in all this ... Existing facts convinced me of the absurdity of the theory that the first living organism originated from inanimate matter, and then, through evolution, turned into a creation of extraordinary complexity ... Now, even the very idea of the possibility of the origin of the first organism capable of self-reproduction, according to the scenario of spontaneous natural evolution, seems to me blasphemous…

Flu is not alone. In fact, he echoes Francis Creek, who was one of the first to describe the helical structure of the DNA molecule:

In the light of the knowledge that is available to us today, the only conclusion that an open-minded person can come to is the recognition of the fact that life is the result of some wonderful creation, otherwise how can one explain the amazingly precise interaction huge amount factors necessary for the origin of life and its development ...

And here is what American biochemist Professor Michael Behe, an employee of Lehigh University in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, and the author of Darwin's Black Box, recently admitted:

Over the past 50 years, biochemists have uncovered many important mysteries of the human cell. Tens of thousands of people have devoted their lives to laboratory research in order to uncover these secrets. But all the efforts expended to study the living organism clearly yielded one result: "Creation."

Is there any point in praying

The Lord not only exists, but also intervenes in our lives, - proves in his bestseller "The Language of God" renowned geneticist and former leader Human Genome Project Francis Collins, whom his own research also made a deeply religious person and the author of the sensational saying: "There are no contradictions between faith in God and science." The scientist refers to the quantum mechanism of uncertainty, which makes the world free, unpredictable in its development and completely inexplicable.

God certainly controls the processes of the universe, writes Collins, but in ways so subtle that they are elusive to modern scientists. In this sense, science opens the door to the realization of divine influence without encroaching on the existing laws of nature.

According to Collins, it turns out that since God is messing with us at the quantum level, it makes sense to pray to him. And ask for help.

By the way, according to the memoirs of Darwin's contemporaries, when he was already close to death and he was asked: "So who created the world?" - he answered: "God."

Philosopher, researcher at the Russian State University for the Humanities Alexei Grigoriev:

The hopes of scientists of the twentieth century that the world would be known in a few decades have not yet come true. And today we do not know the answers to seemingly the most elementary questions: what is energy, electron, attraction? None of the modern brilliant designers are able to create such universal machine what a person is. No engineer will build a system in which, like in the Universe, an amazing balance of planets would be preserved, which would not allow humanity to burn out or freeze. Are not the physical constants that define the structure of our world surprising: gravitational, magnetic, and many others? Many years ago, scientists proved that if these constants were different, for example, differed from the current ones by only one percent, then neither atoms nor galaxies would have arisen. Not to mention people.

The inexplicable orderliness and consistency of the structure of the Universe and man lead many scientists to believe in the Creator.

British physicist Martin John Rees, who won this year's Templeton Prize, believes that the universe is a very complex thing. Scientist with more than 500 scientific works, received $ 1.4 million for proving the existence of the Creator, although the physicist himself is an atheist, the Korrespondent edition adds.

"According to the director of the International Institute of Theoretical and Applied Physics, Academician of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences Anatoly Akimov, the existence of God has been proven scientific methods", - reports INTERFAX.

“God exists, and we can observe the manifestations of His will. This is the opinion of many scientists, they do not just believe in the Creator, but rely on some knowledge,” he said in an interview published on Friday by the Moskovsky Komsomolets newspaper.

At the same time, the scientist noted that in past centuries, many physicists believed in God. Moreover, until the time of Isaac Newton, there was no separation between science and religion. Priests were engaged in science, since they were the most educated people. Newton himself had a theological education and often repeated: "I derive the laws of mechanics from the laws of God."
When scientists invented the microscope and began to study what was happening inside the cell, the processes of duplication and division of chromosomes caused them a stunning reaction: “How could this be if all this was not provided by the Almighty ?!”

“Indeed,” added A. Akimov, “if we talk about the fact that a person appeared on Earth as a result of evolution, then, taking into account the frequency of mutations and the speed of biochemical processes, it would take much more time to create a person from primary cells than the age of the Universe itself” .

"In addition," he continued, "calculations were made that showed that the number of quantum elements in the volume of the radio-observable Universe cannot be less than 10155, and it cannot but have superintelligence."

"If all this one system, then, considering it as a computer, we ask: what is beyond the power of a computing system with so many elements? Same unlimited possibilities, more than the most sophisticated and modern computer by an incommensurable number of times!” - emphasized the scientist.
In his opinion, what various philosophers called the Universal Mind, the Absolute, this is a super-powerful system, which we identify with the potentialities of the Almighty.

“This,” says A. Akimov, “does not contradict the main provisions of the Bible. There, in particular, it is said that God is omnipresent, he is present always and everywhere. We see that this is so: the Lord has unlimited possibilities of influencing everything that happens. A. Akimov was baptized at the age of 55. "Did you believe in God?" the priest asked him when he arrived at the church. “No, I just realized that He cannot not exist!” - answered the scientist.

There is a mass of different scientific evidence both disproving and proving the existence of God. No wonder scientists are called the same affectionate names, as well as historians, identifying them with representatives of the most ancient profession.

Having experience in the media mass media, I can responsibly declare that 99% of public statements are made with the aim of extracting some benefit from this. Our science, which serves the ruling class, is no exception.

Accordingly, they will prove what they were paid for, and then the media will tell you exactly what they were already paid for. Therefore, in today's article we will not touch on scientific evidence for the existence of God, there will be no widely known evidence for the existence of God from Kant.

Let's try to analyze this issue based only on our powers of observation and common sense.

So does God really exist?

Let's look at a person. At the moment of birth, this is a completely helpless being, and many years pass before a worthy member of society appears before society from this being. And then, as far as we can see, not every matured individual becomes a person.

It is so? We cannot put an equal sign between Chikatilo and Rostropovich just because they have the same number of arms, legs and the same gender. It is clear that one of them is not a person in the full sense of the word. By the way, I'm sure that everyone who reads this knows which of them cannot be considered human.

Sorry to digress again, but these digressions are necessary to bring you to a very simple conclusion. In order for a person to become a person in the full sense of the word, that is, physically, intellectually, spiritually, emotionally developed, he must be taught all this.

Yes, people are born different. There are those who show the piano at 2 years old, and he will no longer unhook from it, but there are those like me who have not needed this piano for three hundred years. These addictions, according to the knowledge of the Vedas, are the consequences of our past lives and the desires developed there, but we will not go into this now.

No matter what passions a person is born with, in order for him to become a harmoniously developed being, he must be taught. The first teacher of a person is his family, mom and dad. Then society, a kindergarten, a school, a university, an army, friends, etc., take on his education.

I think that at this stage there should be no questions. Everything seems to be logical and clear. If you really understand everything, then please explain where the rules and principles of behavior came from. in the first family.

Where did the first person who taught everything to the rest come from? Who created and taught him everything he knows now?

There are theories according to which the world evolves from simple to complex. Darwin's theory is a prime example of this. Despite its complete failure, which the author himself admitted at the end of his life, this theory is actively promoted. This happens, rather out of habit and because venerable scientists are so uncomfortable to admit that they have fooled people all their lives.

According to this theory, out of nowhere, suddenly, quite by accident, as a result of a big bad boom, a certain planet itself was created, on which, again by chance, apparently as a result of another woman boom, a living cell was formed in some incredible way.

Moreover, it was formed not anywhere, but in the water, because we all know that life came from the water, the youth may not know, but the older generation remembers this heresy that was hammered into our heads.

Then, again, it is not clear why and why the cell began to develop and the further, the faster and gradually it turned from a ciliate shoe into a highly developed person - the king of nature, who taught his offspring the rules of behavior in society.

Well, not nonsense?! Even if we accept as true the fact that an incredibly complex compound called a living cell was formed by itself and by chance, then explain why this cell had to develop? She doesn’t have brains, she doesn’t strive for anything, they didn’t tell her about evolution at school. We will not delve further into this theory, any sane person will understand that Darwin's theory of evolution is consistent only if you do not ask questions related to this process.

Does God really exist?

Anastasia, the heroine, in turn claims that the universe appeared as the thought of God, manifested materially. It is immediately, initially perfect and it did not require refinement, that is, a person was created - born originally perfect.
And these statements about the origin of the universe and man already have confirmation, about them below, and this is the best proof of the existence of God.

As for evolution, this process undoubtedly takes place. Evolution means a qualitative change in something. And man can certainly evolve.

Man himself has the right to choose how he evolves. Someone chooses physical evolution. Such people monitor their health, count every calorie, go to fitness rooms.

There are those who choose mental and spiritual evolution. These people focus on improving the quality of their thoughts and their soul. It is not for nothing that there is a concept among the people - a person with a wide soul. This is just the one in whom spiritual qualities are developed, and, mind you, we love these more than jocks.

However, many of those who choose the evolution of the spirit for themselves have an interesting effect - the body also becomes harmonious and beautiful. This does not happen by itself, just working on your thoughts leads to the fact that a person himself begins to gradually take care of his body and his health.

But I again got carried away with my favorite topic of human development, forgetting that I wanted to give you a direct proof that God exists. Although, if you think about it, then, in fact, I already did it.

Does God really exist

If you carefully look at the history of mankind known to us, you yourself will understand that the evolution that modern science tells us about has never happened.

There was no caveman who hunted a mammoth with a spear, there was no Pithecanthropus, from which a reasonable man later turned out. The exact opposite is happening. Proof? You are welcome!

Even 30 years ago I could drink water from the Amur River, now it is impossible to imagine even in a nightmare;

Even 60 years ago, my grandfather, going out on a fishing trip* on the same river, could put an oar between the backs of fish, and it stood upright and did not fall! With such a density there was a chum salmon for spawning.

And if you start comparing moral principles society that lived only 100 years ago and today, we will see that humanity has not yet known such a level of degradation as it is today.

It is quite clear that society is degrading, not developing. The material and technical aspect that we are so proud of is nothing more than an attempt to fill a person with his inherent qualities, such as teleportation, telepathy, imagination, etc.

Many examples can be cited to confirm my idea that humanity is not on the path of progress, but on the path of regression, but I will not do this here. Those who want to think about their lives will see these examples in their lives, and those who are convinced that I am wrong are unlikely to be convinced by my arguments.

I do not want the main idea to be lost, so I want to repeat it again. The main and simplest proof of the existence of God is a person and the knowledge that he possesses, because no one except God could create such an incredibly complex organism as a person and put into it all the knowledge that he had before and has now. We all learn, without knowledge we are nothing. Think about where the knowledge came from in the first person, who gave it to him? There is only one answer!

Glossary:
Putin- this is not the name of the president in the accusative case, this is the catch of red fish when it goes to spawn.

Scientific evidence for the existence of God

For those who are still interested in scientific evidence for the existence of God, I copied an article from primeinfo.com.ua. Read it, very informative too.

An absolute shock to the scientific world was the speech of the famous philosophy professor Anthony Flew. The scientist, who is now well over 80, has been one of the pillars of scientific atheism for many years. For decades, Flue has published books and lectured on the thesis that belief in God is unjustified.

However, a series of recent scientific discoveries has forced the great advocate of atheism to change his views. Flue publicly stated that he was wrong, and the universe could not have arisen on its own - it was obviously created by someone more powerful than we can imagine.

According to the scientist, modern data on the structure of the DNA molecule irrefutably indicate that it could not have arisen on its own, but is someone's development. The genetic code and the literally encyclopedic volumes of information that a molecule stores in itself refute the possibility of a blind coincidence.

British physicist Martin John Rees, who won this year's Templeton Prize, believes that the universe is a very complex thing. The scientist, who has more than 500 scientific papers to his credit, received $1.4 million for proving the existence of the Creator. Although the physicist himself is an atheist, the Correspondent adds.

“According to the director of the International Institute of Theoretical and Applied Physics, Academician of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences Anatoly Akimov, the existence of God has been proven by scientific methods.”

“God exists, and we can observe the manifestations of His will. This is the opinion of many scientists, they do not just believe in the Creator, but rely on some knowledge.”

At the same time, the scientist noted that in past centuries, many physicists believed in God. Moreover, before the time of Isaac Newton, there was no separation between science and religion; priests were engaged in science, since they were the most educated people. Newton himself had a theological education and often repeated: "I derive the laws of mechanics from the laws of God."

When scientists invented the microscope and began to study what was happening inside the cell, the processes of duplication and division of chromosomes caused them a stunning reaction: “How can this be if all this was not provided by the Almighty ?!”

“In addition,” he continued, “calculations were made that showed that the number of quantum elements in the volume of the radio observable Universe cannot be less than 10155, and it cannot but have superintelligence.”

“If all this is a single system, then, considering it as a computer, we ask: what is beyond the power of a computing system with so many elements? These are unlimited possibilities, more than the most sophisticated and modern computer by an incommensurable number of times!” - emphasized the scientist.

In his opinion, what various philosophers called the Universal Mind, the Absolute, this is a super-powerful system, which we identify with the potentialities of the Almighty.

A. Akimov was baptized at the age of 55. "Did you believe in God?" the priest asked him when he arrived at the church. “No, I just realized that it cannot not be!” - answered the scientist.

Often called "Apologetics".

Did some being really create the universe? Does it know how it did it, and also does it have the power to possibly do it again? Has this being manifested itself to humanity through the person of Jesus Christ, and does it continue to rule the world through the Holy Spirit, as the Bible claims? Is the God of the Bible the best possible explanation for existence? These are the main claims of Christianity, and this article will allow you to provide convincing evidence that all of the above arguments are indeed true.

Steps

Use the Bible as a narrative, faithful and poetic source for understanding divine intervention (influence) in everyday events (but not coercion) and the development of Judaism through early christianity, and that it is also a spiritual roadmap of creation and opens the highest goal and God's plan for mankind. The Bible's opening statement says, "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." (Genesis 1:1) Question: "Who or what can say who or what really started the universe?" modern science– though she's not entirely sure what, when, or how: ~ Outline scientific theories that postulate that the known universe does in fact originate from what's called the "Big Bang Theory." It makes no logical sense to claim that "absolutely nothing" could have produced that initial explosion or anything else: "something existed" and "caused it" - creating the things we think it all started with.

Ask those who do not believe in God to consider the accuracy of the Bible, i.e. e. that:

Show a picture of the God the Bible describes in words as the revelation of the only God. He is omniscient (knows, observes and experiences everything), omnipotent, having an image, but not having the usual physical flesh and blood, omnipresent, eternal, unchanging, indivisible, giving freedom of choice (freedom) with many ensuing consequences / rewards, and all of his worries are the cause of his perfect love. The Bible says, "God is spirit..." (John 4:24), and it says, "God is love..." (1 John 4:8), and that "perfect love casts out fear." Reverent interdependence/relationships and amazing grace filling the entire universe suggest a planner, a creator, a superhuman architect with unlimited knowledge and powers. It takes time and perhaps eternity for the mind of humans to know what the original mind (the divine mind) actually achieved in creating the universe and all that it contains. The Bible says that God created mankind in his own image (Genesis 1:26-27), and it is logical to realize that the human mind is able to get more and more advanced in understanding the universe, because the human mind has an affinity with the divine mind.

Discuss how one man known as Jesus fulfilled many Old Testament messianic prophecies and did things that no one a common person could not do. It was written that Jesus was born in Bethlehem (Micah 5:2) of the tribe of Judah (Genesis 49:10), and went to the temple (Malachi 3:1) and rose from the dead (Isaiah 53:11). Historical sources and archaeological evidence establish the legitimacy of Jesus of Nazareth as indeed an existing person, as real as any other famous historical figure. Books called gospels document the life and teachings of Jesus, and the existence and spread of Christianity as a major religion, showing Christ's goal of giving free access to all miracles through his support/intercession.

Develop the theme of an imperfect world, but where the ability to focus on a "good" (or optimal) outcome markedly exceeds the hopeless life that anyone could imagine, perhaps much worse - if it were just random or unintended and dependent on the mercy of the material non-living aspects of the universe. It tends to decline, fade, break down, collapse against amazingly self-healing life forms and human beings that can visualize, give hope, build and improve many things. While the material universe provides us with everything we need to maintain, improve, and enjoy life, there are also exquisite luxuries that are not necessary for survival and reproduction, such as knowledge: art, music, and ever-evolving technology. Is this a sign of an indifferent cosmos, or is it an indication of the existence of someone very friendly to self-taught people? It seems reasonable to conclude that the universe materialized due to the presence of an intelligent force/source. When one takes the time to learn how so many things are working right for us to be here and how difficult it would be perhaps to explain how none of this interdependence will work wrong without asking God for or against it (or to beliefs). It also seems as if the universe was made for humans, considering how phenomenal they are with the rare ability to "be successful" in order to maximize the universe's somewhat latent potential.

Explain that there are many examples that show the existence of God, but you need to be able to see and recognize their veracity. Accept them instead of doubting, try to see them instead of closing your eyes, and you will believe that God exists. Discuss how the usefulness and attractiveness of man-made things, when presented, do not have random qualities, but are the result of our intellectual nature and our natural admiration for order, balance, and beauty. Similarly, it would be unreasonable to claim that the exceptional utility and attractiveness of things in nature is accidental, but it is probably more reasonable to conclude that they are the result of the existence of an unsurpassed intellect that also delights in order, balance, and beauty. Creativity is the basis and pinnacle of the existence of all living and non-living things, and it is up to each person to try to explain his or her natural reverence for this known state of affairs. The Bible says that God created everything and was quite pleased with his work.

Plans, prescriptions acquired only during life:

Encourage people to look around and see the world. Does he or she only see trees and not an interdependent forest? It is obvious that God exists, because his creation is not only one thing, but also prescriptions for all life in the biosphere of the world, for the galaxy in which the world is located, and the universe in which the galaxy is located - and He is the driving force all this. Living cells that have been designed and created to be self-replicating cells or organisms.
- Each system is mixed, is interconnected with others. The "universe of life" operates according to complex and precise instructions for the formation of trillions of cells in order to correctly construct one life, for example, a person. Who or what developed the concept and formulated these interconnected instructions? The Bible indicates that God is the being who spoke the first words and that God is the source of all life (which contains all the plans, genes and living cells necessary for the implementation of the plans).
Show how these natural, interdependent systems point to God when you look at the little factories needed in a cell to build and run one of them (or from other cells in the body and nowhere else in nature). For example, trace the interdependence of the sequence of events when proteins are assembled exclusively in a living cell (which was in the first place: the cell or the laws that work only inside it and nowhere else).
- These proteins, as they are supposed to, become part of the structure of the body and perform many functions, but their formation requires the gradual processing of substances of nucleic acids called "nucleotides", sugars plus nitrogen and phosphates - that's where they come from. All of them were produced by a single cell (or interacting cells of a multicellular organism), following very specific plans.
Discuss where important plans (purposeful instructions) for the existence of life came from: in living cells. Instructions only make sense when processed by existing "living" cells, and they only work there.

Realize that complexity does not matter, only the interdependence of materials and instructions (plans) functions for a particular system. Why? Dead/non-living cells don't need or use plans, no processes, nothing constructive (can't read and follow genetic plans).
- Imagine how an existing, living cell needed to use DNA and RNA (acid molecules). They work like an assembly line, according to the instructions for this "automated assembly line" (explained below), by matching the opposite nucleotides of the DNA and the "messenger RNA" plus the "transfer RNA" along with the "ribosome" (a form of RNA) that goes along the pipeline: what is messenger RNA. At every third nucleotide of the messenger RNA, the ribosome stops and the transfer RNA adds amino acids as the next link in the growing chain, which, in the end, will come off the assembly line as one of the trillion proteins that form living systems.
- DNA polymerase catalyzes the formation of DNA. This raises the question, which came first, DNA or DNA polymerase? This is just one of the many similar functions and cycles that make up the chemical machinery found in all living cells. If any of these cycles were broken, life could not exist. Either instructions exist or life does not exist. Here is another gap that cannot be explained.

Human features and other thoughts

Mention that we are all born with the knowledge that there is right and wrong, with many opportunities to appreciate simplicity and elegance, to communicate, to analyze, to synthesize and calculate - plus to design and build. So people tend to enjoy creativity, not mindless destruction. Read the Bible and find out where the knowledge of good and evil comes from: from God.

Discuss the fact that each of us has a desire to seek love and acceptance (God is love...). Since childhood, we have been trying to fill the void that exists within us. The desire to share life with another person, enjoying fellowship, comes from Adam and Eve, who dreamed of loving and being loved, as complementary to each other and as a means to create humanity. The Christian idea that humanity is God's most valuable creation is quite logical. We need air and it surrounds the planet we call home. We need water, and it falls purified from the sky. We must consume food in order to live, and it sprouts from the earth and is found in abundance in the water and on land. And the family model of parents, spouses, and children exists to satisfy our greatest need for love. Consider that the power, beauty, and knowledge of one is for the instruction, development, and upliftment of all mankind. No other religion, except Christianity, very convincingly proves that life is a gift of love from God, and our life should be lived in the service of humanity (and attributed to God). If we believe that there is a reason for everything that happens, then if things are created, then they have a builder and inventor: the God of creation.

Check out some thoughts, famous quotes that can be used to prove that the Christian God exists.

Recognize that God can exist in a form that is vastly different from what you currently comprehend, for God's ways are as exalted above ours as the sky extends around and beyond the earth.
Let them know that the miracle of receiving the power of God through the Holy Spirit is available to anyone who asks. (Luke 11:13)
For a more theological/philosophical approach, check out the introductions to Clive Staples Lewis' Mere Christianity and Suffering. For a strictly philosophical approach, one should study the cosmological argument (Thomas Aquinas or later William Lane Craig, Alexander Prus and Richard Taylor) or the teleological argument (Robin Collins). The ontological argument, while proving that belief in God is rational, and reasoned arguments tend not to convince people because of their complex philosophical reasoning (Alvin Plantinga and Robert Meidol). Beware of distorted arguments (for example, thorns on roses are not proof that God does not exist).
Discuss the fact that human beings seem predisposed to believe in God. Man's ability to reason means that people are able to recognize the necessity of certain things in order to bring about some others. Ask if it is in any way logical to conclude that a random explosion could lead to something carefully orchestrated. Is the cosmos most likely the result of intelligence and planning, or blind chance?
If you hope that people will respect your opinion, respect their point of view first of all on the way to Jesus Christ.
Show the absurdity of denying the existence of God. What is the probability that a tornado flying over a landfill will accidentally collect a Boeing 747 from the materials lying there? (Fred Hoyle) What are the chances that life was formed by chance? The point is that there are certain things that unreasonable forces simply cannot do.
Be humble and meek, giving clear, consistent answers.
If people start talking about "Christian crusades” (1095-1291), during which many people were killed and advanced civilizations destroyed, answer them by explaining how these actions (although sometimes done in the name of Christianity) actually contradict Christian doctrine. All people are fallen, and thus prone to immoral acts.
Challenge the idea that religion is "unscientific". Gravity is an invisible force that makes it clear why all objects fall to the ground, while God is an invisible force that explains the existence of the universe, living beings and the survival, growth, and reproduction of organisms. Does assigning the term “natural” to something eliminate the need for God? Explore the mystery of consciousness. How likely is it that matter itself gave rise to intelligence? Many physicists believe that any theory would be incomplete if it did not take into account the existence of consciousness to some extent.
Raise the question of why there is something and not nothing? The question "why" implies recognition alternative possibilities. Can the universe not exist? It is illogical to assume that existence has been provoked, because in order for something to cause someone's existence, it must exist before it, thus making it impossible for it to be the cause of existence. However, opportunity precedes everything. What is the substance of possibility? Claim that God is the eternal source of infinite possibilities.
Understand that, strictly speaking, if you want your information to be regarded as knowledge or fact or truth, it must be obtained through your own observation and experience. However, there may be enough evidence relevant to the topic to persuade a person to come to a logical conclusion, and in some cases the evidence may be so overwhelming that it can be said that it is correct to assume that an individual's point of view is accurate. Considering the available arguments, it is best for all concerned to start with the assumption that the existence or non-existence of God is a moot point.
If you are being criticized for your belief in God, you might point out that it takes more faith to believe that the most incredible thing happened on its own than it does to believe that a superhuman power, such as God, created a superhuman invention, such as the universe. In this regard, the question arises, who invented God? Some people are of the opinion that if God can exist without a creator, then why can't the universe? You don't have to have all the answers. The universe seems to fit a person like a glove on a hand. Ask if it is possible that we really could be so lucky?
Explain how the theories of creationism and evolution are not mutually exclusive. Discuss the dissimilarity of every single piece of matter in the universe generating spontaneously. For example, did all the "organic" carbon compounds in the universe come into being without any help, formed by chance? This goes beyond evolution, because how did the interdependent components of the first cell come about? Evolution details how the survival of the fittest leads to the emergence of the fittest, but it does not detail the birth of the first living, self-replicating, surviving, purposeful organism.
Some people may object, "If the Christian God exists, then where are all the miracles that the Bible talks about?" Let them know these miracles are happening and show them by example.

An absolute shock for the scientific world was the speech of the famous professor of philosophy Anthony Flew.

The scientist, who is now well over 80, has been one of the pillars of scientific atheism for many years. For decades, Flue published books and gave lectures based on the thesis that faith in the Almighty is unjustified, the Meta portal writes.

According to Flue, earlier he, like other atheists, was convinced that once upon a time, the first living matter simply appeared from dead matter.

“Today, it is impossible to imagine the construction of an atheistic theory of the origin of life and the appearance of the first organism of reproduction,” Flue says.

British physicist Martin John Rees, who won this year's Templeton Prize, believes the universe is very complex. The scientist, who has more than 500 scientific papers to his credit, received $1.4 million for proving the existence of the Creator. Although the physicist himself is an atheist, the Correspondent adds.

According to the director of the International Institute for Theoretical and Applied Physics, Academician of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences Anatoly Akimov, the existence of God has been proven by scientific methods, - reports INTERFAX.

“In addition,” he continued, “calculations were made that showed that the number of quantum elements in the volume of the radio-observable Universe cannot be less than 10155, and it cannot but have superintelligence.”

In his opinion, what various philosophers called the Universal Mind, the Absolute, this is a super-powerful system, which we identify with the potentialities of the Almighty.

Today we will talk about whether it is possible to prove whether there is a God and the devil or not, about the most striking evidence of the existence of dark and light forces, about what it looks like, what God and the devil are. In our article, you will receive proof of the existence of God and the devil.

Before you start reading this article, answer yourself the question - Do you believe in God or not? If you believe, then why? How do you know He exists? If you do not believe, then how can you be sure that God does not exist? What do you think is the evidence for the existence or, conversely, the absence of God?

And now let's talk a little about the meaninglessness of the existence of the devil without God and vice versa.

All people are divided into several categories: those who believe in God; those who do not believe in God; those who believe in God sometimes..

Why am I not talking now about the devil and about those who believe only in him? Because the existence of the devil without God is absurd, few people believe in the devil, not believing in God, except that there are those who recognize the power of the devil, for example, the same magicians, sorcerers, psychics. And they believe in God, in their own way .. sort of like “the demons believe and tremble”, but still they choose the dark power.

If the devil existed without God (even theoretically, without evidence), then our earth would have been dead long ago, like us, or other unfavorable forecasts ... And as many believers suggest, people are the “battlefield” for finding out relations and competitions between God and the devil, who will “lure the people” more, on whose side you will stand - that you and the warrior, etc., can not be called a battlefield, but more gently, loyally, correctly, but the essence of this is not particularly will change.

Even the short stay of Adam and Eve in Paradise (when everything was fine with people and only God existed for them) quickly ended, because this competition between God and the devil should have begun, where people, it turns out, are pawns. It ended rhetorically: they say, the man himself turned out to be so down to earth and sinful that he was led by the fairy tales of the snake and ate the forbidden fruit ... And this duality of human nature is inherent in everyone forever and from birth, and everyone eats this forbidden fruit - so if not for Adam and Eva, we would do it.

But the paradox, according to the same Bible, is already in the fact that in man himself there is both light and dark - a craving for the divine and earthly, sinful, and these two natures always fight, which one will overpower, that is, which one the person himself will choose - on the side of those he turns out to be strong. According to the theory of Christianity, everything begins with the choice of a person, and even though we are pawns in a game of two forces, we are able to choose.

There are 7 million people on earth (already more), everyone has their own opinion about whether there is a God and the devil or not, everyone has their own version of evidence on this topic. Let's look at the main ones from the popular ones, and then the more subjective ones.

From the point of view of science, there is not a single reliable confirmation of the existence of God, moreover, there is not even a clear definition of who God is. There are only arguments of philosophers, psychologists.

So, for example, morality did not come from nowhere: “In our conscience there is an unconditional demand for the moral law. Morality is from God.

“From the observation that the majority of people follow certain moral laws, that is, they are aware of what is good and what is bad, it is concluded that there is an objective morality, but since good people do bad things and bad people capable of doing good, a source of morality independent of man is needed. It concludes that the source of objective morality can only be a higher being, that is, God.

The fact that a person has a moral law - conscience (which differs from earthly laws only in greater accuracy and inexorability), and an inner conviction in the need for the final triumph of justice, indicates the existence of a legislator. Torments of conscience sometimes lead to the fact that the criminal, having the opportunity to forever hide his crime, comes and announces himself.

Conscience is one of the clearest proofs of the existence of God... No matter how paradoxical it may sound, it is precisely with the sprouts of divine power planted inside every person that the desire to do good more than evil is born in us, if someone has the opposite, they say that he buried his conscience.

From the point of view of scientists, not everything is so simple ... “buried” conscience ... For example, Erich Fromm (German sociologist) argued that the predominance of craving for evil begins when a person kills the love of life in himself, this happens due to different reasons, one of which is psychotrauma, but this switch is turned by the person himself, sometimes he is able to stop, but often he does not.

The cosmological argument for the existence of God (from Wikipedia):

“Everything must have a reason. The chain of causes cannot be endless, there must be the very first cause. The root cause is most often called "God" by some.

It occurs, in part, already in Aristotle, who distinguished between the concepts of being random and necessary, conditional and unconditional, and declared the need to recognize the first beginning of any action in the world in a number of relative causes.

Avicenna mathematically formulated the cosmological argument for the existence of God as the single and indivisible cause of all things. A very similar justification is given by Thomas Aquinas as the second proof of the existence of God, although his formulation is not as strict as that of Avicenna. Subsequently, this proof was simplified and formalized by William Hatcher.

The cosmological argument looks something like this:

Every thing in the universe has its cause outside itself (children have their cause in their parents, details are made in a factory, etc.);

The universe, being composed of things having their cause outside of themselves, must itself have its cause outside of itself;

Since the universe is matter existing in time and space, possessing energy, it follows that the cause of the universe must be outside these four categories.

Therefore, there is a non-material cause of the Universe, not limited by space and time, not possessing energy.

Conclusion: God exists. From the third point it follows that he is an immaterial spirit, outside of space (that is, omnipresent), outside of time (eternal), and independent of energy (omnipotent).

In general, someone created the Universe, us, forests, trees, rivers, lakes, fish, insects, etc. They couldn't come from anywhere. And the most probable assumption of the appearance of all this is God. Why He created all this - as an option - the assumptions at the beginning of the article. Perhaps he was bored in this empty universe, so he created the crown of creation - man, in order to compete with the proud angel Lucifer.

from Islamic theology: “In the light of the Big Bang theory, the cosmological argument is as follows:

Everything that has ever appeared has a reason

the universe came into existence

Therefore, the universe has a cause."

This also includes paradigms about eternity, being and non-being ... In addition to mortal existence and our temporary shell, there is something else, and, perhaps, many understand and feel this, but, unfortunately, the vanity of this world drowns out the call to the eternal inside a person. However, the soul is eternal, as many who have visited the Other World testify, and our planet has existed for many centuries, perhaps millions of years .. and human life lasts only tens of years.

The fact that inside a person, if you look deep into yourself, does not agree with the fact that “there was a person and there is no person and there are no traces of him”, I want to believe that there is a continuation of life, I don’t want to believe that our soul will someday stop existence as if we never existed.

And this is already a paradox: where does this come from in us? Where does this longing for eternity come from?

The theological argument for the existence of God suggests that the world is too complex to come into being on its own, and if there is a clock that runs, then there must be a watchmaker who created it. Scientists, deriving formulas about the complexity of the universe, came to the conclusion that there must certainly exist, if not God, then the Supreme Mind for sure. In Kabbalah, he is called the Great Architect, in Islam, Allah, in Buddhism, the Buddha, etc. But the source of everything - a certain deity - is the answer of many not only philosophers and humanitarians, but also scientists.

Faith could not come from nowhere as an independent desire for some newly invented God, it is embedded in the human psyche from the womb. A person does not just need to believe in something, it is vitally important for a person to believe in something, replacing at least some kind of surrogate craving for God as a creator. Therefore, all smaller semblances of faith in God are only compensation for the lack of communication between man and God.

There is not a single country, not a single city in the world without a religion, without a temple - this already says a lot.

According to Plutarch: “Go around all the countries, and you can find cities without walls, without writing, without rulers, without palaces, without riches, without coins, but no one has yet seen a city devoid of temples and gods, a city in which prayers would not be sent, not swore by the name of the deity.

“The fact that a person reaches out to God, feels the need for religious worship, indicates that the Deity really exists; that which does not exist does not attract. F. Werfel said: “Thirst is the best proof of the existence of water.”

The religious argument, despite being criticized by scholars, is one of the strongest proofs for the existence of God for believers. Relics of saints, exorcism, drops of blood on the shroud, visions in progress clinical death in reality, other tongues - prayer in other tongues, etc. All this, according to believers, was taken only directly from God ...

There is still a long list of proofs and arguments for the existence of God, but there is not a single reliable and indisputable evidence. All existing evidence has its own denials, doubts and other versions.

God gave us the biggest mystery - himself ... As if leaving the choice for everyone whom He created, to believe in Him or not ...

And if everything were clear, then there would no longer be God.

What does the Bible say about God? Yes, in fact, the entire Bible is a book inspired by God, which means that it was written by people who dedicated themselves to God and are in His will, through all the messages these people tell us something important, that is, in fact, God speaks through them.

“The Bible says about the incomprehensible and incorporeal God the Father:

You cannot see My face, because a person cannot see Me and stay alive (Exodus 33:20).

And it is also said: no one has ever seen God; The Only Begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, He revealed (John 1.18).

In the book of the prophet David, the Psalter, there are approximately the following words: The fool said in his heart: “There is no God” (Ps. 13.1).

The Bible also says that God is love, God is spirit, God is triune…

Why has no one ever seen God in real form? There are versions that a person is too impure to touch and come so close to such a holy image as God, besides, God is associated with light and fire, and can both transform into a shell and be a spirit, but a person can go blind when looking at Him , burn out, etc.

But there was one unconditional manifestation of God to people according to the Bible - this is Jesus Christ, who brought salvation to the world. And Christ embodied the essence of God on earth. But after all, it seems that people saw God ... well, what did they do with him ?? Crucified…

A few words about the devil. Even if we assume without question that the devil exists - what does he look like, what do you think? A devil with horns and glowing eyes? People often think that this is some kind of image from horror films ... In fact, the devil is a stumbled (proud of his beauty and intelligence) angel, angels are incorporeal creatures and they are lower in rank than people. The question that will remain eternal: why, then, this angel, who is simply a ministering spirit, keeps the whole earth in fear, dominates people? There is no definitive answer...

The devil uses people to fulfill his goals. And his goal is the destruction of everything that God created. He cannot create anything new, remember The Master and Margarita (novel)? The devil only copies the actions of God, only with a minus sign, the devil is a magician, an illusionist. In order to lure a person into his nets, he offers temporary benefits, that is, he does evil through good.

The evidence for his existence is as uncertain as the arguments for the existence of God, but the question of the existence of the devil is not as popular as the question of the life of God. Probably because the devil is a figure dependent on God, and yet this is a very dark niche where you should not climb unnecessarily.

Magicians, healers, sorcerers, psychics know perfectly well, even if they tell you fairy tales, what kind of use of their power they pay a certain price, and that price is the sale of the soul to the devil... Of course, as long as they are alive there is always a chance to repent, but as long as they are alive.

Even if you do not pronounce the word "devil", then you can safely say that there is a certain negative energy, there is evil in the end, there are troubles, tragedies, there is death, illness, suffering, which are clearly not from God ... According to the Bible - after the fall, the earth was given into the power of the devil, the earth is cursed, therefore everything on it is mortal, perishable, including human flesh.

Poltergeists, fever from demonic possession, ghosts, monsters in the night - these are "flowers" compared to the real possibilities of the devil if people are in his power. For example, Hitler is the incarnation of the devil on earth, one of the incarnations ...

Summing up the article, I would like to say that there is no unequivocal evidence of the existence of God for crafty minds, however, just as there is no affirmative evidence of the absence of God ...

But still - if there is no God, in fact, a person is also an “incomprehensible little animal”, created incomprehensibly by whom, it is incomprehensible for what ...

Everyone makes the choice to accept the available evidence as sufficient or to reject it.

Also on topic

What can I take on the exam

Exam test in English

How to pass the exam to a graduate of past years: step by step instructions

Characteristics of the Aries man - Bull from A to Z

Preparation for the GIA and the Unified State Exam in social studies