Portal about bathroom renovation. Useful tips

Scheme for parsing a sentence by parts of speech. In a complex non-union sentence

II.Morphological characteristics

    Initial form (in I.p., in singular).

    Constant signs:

a) proper or common noun;

b) animate or inanimate;

d) declination.

3. Variable signs:

III. Syntactic role.

Parse a noun like this:

The river flows from north South.

I. From the north – noun.

II.1. N. f. -north,

2.a) popular;

b) inanimate;

d) 2nd class.

3. a) in R.p.;

b) in units.

III. Leaking (from where?) from North.

35. Scheme for parsing an adjective (morphological parsing).

I. Part of speech. General meaning.

II.Morphological characteristics

    Initial form (in I.p., in singular, in m.r.).

    Constant signs: (don’t know yet)

3. Variable signs:

c) gender (in units)

III. Syntactic role.

Parse the adjective like this:

On thin The branches of the birch tree sparkled with frost.

I. Thin – adj.

II.1. N. f. - thin,

3. a) in pp;

b) in the plural.

III. On branches (which ones?) thin.

36. Verb parsing scheme (morphological parsing).

I. Part of speech.

II.Morphological characteristics

    Initial form (indefinite form).

    Constant signs:

b) conjugation.

3. Variable signs:

c) face (if any),

d) gender (if any).

III. Syntactic role.

Parse the verb like this:

Are thickening twilight.

I. Condensed – verb.

II.1. N. f. - thicken,

2.a) nonsense. view,

3. a) in the plural..;

b) at the present time,

c) in the 3rd person.

III. Twilight (what are they doing?) are thickening.

37. Analysis of sentences by parts of speech.

Write out a proposal. Above the words, abbreviate the names of the parts of speech.

ex. adj. noun Ch. adj.

Do this : WITH high mountains rang loudly

Remember:

Part of speech

Indicates

Answers the questions

Noun

Independent parts of speech

Specific objects (door, window),

Living beings (human, bird, animal),

Natural phenomena (slush, snow, wind),

Events (holiday, hike),

Process of action (running, growing),

Abstract concepts (kindness, friendship)

Who? What?

Adjective

attribute of an object

Which? which? which? which? whose?

Verb

action of the subject

what is he doing?

what will he do?

Adverb

sign of action, another sign

When?

Why?

Pronoun

Which?

How many?

Numeral

quantity,

counting order

How many?

Which?

which?

which?

which?

Union

Functional parts of speech

connects words and sentences

Pretext

connection with other words

Particle

additional meaning in a sentence

Interjection

expresses different feelings

Middle and high school students regularly face the problem of how to conduct an analysis in the Russian literary language.

Parsing is done in accordance with a certain scheme. This topic in school course allows identify sentence structure, characterize it, which reduces punctuation illiteracy.

In contact with

What does parsing show?

There are four main types of parsing: phonetic, morphological, compositional and syntactic. The latter is understood as the analysis or parsing of syntactic units with primary highlighting the grammatical basis. The analysis is carried out according to the approved algorithm of actions: highlight the terms + characterize them + draw a diagram.

Schoolchildren, having studied eleven grades, sometimes do not know what parsing a sentence is. They talk about analysis as analysis by composition. This is incorrect, since only individual lexemes are analyzed according to their composition. As for a bunch of words expressing a complete thought, in elementary school the process is called analysis of proposals by members. However, in middle and high school it takes on a deeper meaning. Based on this, it is necessary to remember once and for all that analysis of sentences by composition is not carried out in Russian language classes.

The answer here is obvious - everyone knows the subject, indicating an object or object, and the predicate - to actions performed first. To make the speech clearer and the statement complete, the main members are supplemented by secondary ones, which have a set of features.

The secondary members of the sentence allow us to reveal a holistic picture of the events taking place. Their goal is to explain describe the actions of the main predecessors.

At the next stage, you will have to parse the sentence according to. Here we mean how its members are expressed. Each has several options, you need to choose the right one by asking the question:

  • vile – noun, place;
  • tale - ch., cr. adj., noun;
  • def. – adj., place., number;
  • add. – noun, place;
  • obst. – adverb, noun. with a pretext.

Taking into account the above, a more or less clear idea emerges of what syntactic parsing of a sentence is. In short, it is a complex analysis of related lexemes that express a complete thought.

Characteristics of syntactic units

You need to know the criteria that a lexeme has in order to implement detailed description. The characteristics of a sentence in the text presuppose a certain algorithm.

Define the type:

  • according to the purpose of the statement (narrative, interrogative, incentive);
  • by emotional-expressive coloring (by intonation) - exclamatory or non-exclamatory.

We find grammatical basis.

We talk sequentially about each member of the sentence and the means of their expression.

We describe the structure of a syntactic unit. For a simple sentence:

  • by composition: one-part (defined-personal, indefinite-personal, generalized-personal, impersonal, nominative) or two-part;
  • by prevalence: widespread or not widespread;
  • by completeness: complete or incomplete.
  • what is complicated: homogeneous members, interjections, address, introductory constructions.

Determine which This type includes a complex sentence:

  • compound sentences (CCS) - they are indicated by simple parts connected by a coordinating conjunction;
  • complex sentences (SPP) - we establish the main thing, as well as subordinate word, based on the question and the peculiarity of the construction (what the subordinate clause refers to, how it is attached), we determine the type of the latter;
  • non-union complex sentence (BCS) - we establish how many simple parts the syntactic unit consists of, determining the meaning of each (simultaneity, sequence, opposition, etc.).

We give the reasoning for why we put these are the punctuation marks.

If the task involves drawing up a diagram, then we do it.

Perform parsing complex sentence more difficult.

There's more here parameters for analysis.

After the complex sentence from the examples has been parsed into simple parts, we proceed to analyze each of them separately.

Following the algorithm, the student will not have problems completing the task number 4.

How to make a diagram

It is not always enough to parse a simple sentence correctly to get an excellent grade. The student must also be able to draw up diagrams of the units being described.

  1. Highlight the subject by underlining it with one line, and the predicate with two lines.
  2. Find the minor members, underlining them according to generally accepted rules.
  3. Sentences with a revolution or participle are highlighted as follows and are indicated in the final diagram. The participial phrase is highlighted on both sides by vertical lines, and a dot/dotted line is emphasized. Participial stands out on both sides with vertical lines, and is emphasized by a wavy line.
  4. To the diagram compound sentence the union is not included, it is taken outside the framework. But complex sentences include it in the subordinate clause. Conjunctions and allied words are enclosed in an oval.

Important! Before you can draw up a sentence diagram, you need to learn how to graphically designate homogeneous members. They are enclosed in a circle, and an address that is not a member of a syntactic unit is designated in the diagram by the letter “O” and separated by two vertical lines. Do the same with introductory words.

Scheme of proposal It’s easy to make up direct speech. Here it is important to separate one part from the other, i.e. the author's words from direct speech, placing appropriate punctuation marks between them.

Example of parsing a simple sentence

Let's write down an example and start analyzing.

I have not seen a lake more magnificent than Baikal.

Stage I: analysis of the proposal by members:

  • “I” – vile, expressed personal. places;
  • “Didn’t see” – simple ch. tale, expressed verb. will express it in the form. incl. past vr.;

Stage II: Let's find out which members of the sentence form the grammatical basis. Here it will be “I didn’t see”, so we are dealing with a simple sentence.

IN specific example all minor members joined the predicate:

  • didn’t see (what?) the lake – additional, expressed noun. in R.P.;
  • lake (which one?) is more magnificent – ​​disagree, def, expressed adj. in compare degrees;
  • more magnificent (what?) than Baikal – additional, expressed noun. in R.P.

Stage III: at the end of the process they give general characteristics simple sentence In russian language:

  • by structure - two-part, widespread, complete;
  • according to the purpose of the statement - narrative;
  • intonation - non-exclamatory, therefore, at the end there is a punctuation mark - a period.

Stage IV: syntactic analysis a simple sentence presupposes the scheme [- =].

More problems causes syntactic analysis of a sentence with an adverbial phrase. See his examples below.

Sample: Behind the swamp, blazing with birches, a grove was visible.

Characteristics: narrative, unspoken, simple, two-part, widespread, complete, complicated by a separate dep. about.

Scheme: [, I adverbial phrase I, = — ].

Syntactic units complicated by homogeneous members and phrases are parsed in a similar way.

Simple sentences with participles should receive an objective assessment. They indicate which member the entire turn is, then its parts are parsed into words.

Sample: The moon had just emerged from behind a hill and was illuminating the translucent, small, low clouds.

Characteristics: narrative, non-narrative, homogeneous tales. are connected by a non-repeating conjunction “and”, therefore a comma is not placed between them, but commas must be placed between definitions, they have non-union connection, simple, two-part, common, complicated by homogeneous tales. and def.

Scheme: [- = and = O, O, O].

Analysis of complex sentences

Home exercises in Russian regularly contain a mandatory task under the number 4. There are various examples here: SSP, SPP, BSP.

Always, when parsing a complex sentence, you need to start it with finding the grammatical basis.

Complex sentences need to be analyzed based on the definition of the main and subordinate clauses.

Parsing of syntactic units with several subordinate clauses is carried out according to overall plan how it would be done analysis of the proposal by composition, but indicating the type of subordination and the combination of these types. Below are samples complex sentences with examples, with diagrams, clearly demonstrating analysis.

Sample SPP with sequential obedience: The kids reported that they picked those daisies that their grandmother loved.

Characteristics: narrative, non-narrative, complex, conjunction, its parts are connected subordinating connection with sequential subordination, consists of two simple ones.

Scheme: [- =], (which = (which = -).

Sample BSC: Life is given once, and you want to live it cheerfully, meaningfully, beautifully.

Characteristics: narrative, non-vocal, complex sentence, has two grammatical bases, conjunctive, complex. The conjunction “and” expresses simultaneity. The 2nd simple sentence is complicated by homogeneous objects. condition.

Scheme: [- =], and [=].

BSP sample: The wind howls, thunder rumbles.

Characteristics: narrative, non-narrative, complex non-union.

Scheme: [- =], [- =].

Parsing a simple sentence

How to parse

Conclusion

If you have sentences and examples with diagrams before your eyes, then visual memory automatically works. This helps well on control dictations and independent ones. This way you can learn automatically and parse accurately proposals (if the examples are chosen correctly) cover all the criteria necessary for the analysis.

Parsing a sentence is the most frequently asked task from school, which some people fail to do. Today I will tell you how to outwit your teacher and do everything right.

Today I will give you the TOP 5 services that will help you analyze a sentence into parts of speech.

All of them can perform some kind of parsing of sentences or words. Each of them has some pros and cons.

These services will be specialized for both Russian and English languages.

And I’ll say right away, they don’t work great by themselves, but they will help you cope with for the most part Your assignment.

Comparison

In the tables above I have listed the best of best services, which can help you with your sentence parsing assignments.

If you have read the table, I propose to start analyzing each of the services and we will start from the very last line of our list and gradually reach the leader of our TOP.

Service name Service language Word/sentence Link
GoldLit Russian Offer http://goldlit.ru/component/slog
Gramota.ru Russian Word http://gramota.ru/slovari/dic
Morphology online Russian Word http://morphologyonline.ru
Delph-in English Offer http://erg.delph-in.net/logon
Lexis Res English Offer http://www.lexisrex.com/English/Sentence-Study/

№5 Lexis Res

Using this link you can get to this service and evaluate its work yourself: http://www.lexisrex.com/English/Sentence-Study.

What kind of site is this? For people who study English, this is just a treasure. This page allows you to analyze English text. It can be used by a person with any level of knowledge.

This is a service that allows you to parse a sentence completely in English language. Sentences can be simple, complex, compound or complex.

In addition to the fact that the site does this analysis of any type of sentence, it also explains each word by meaning. That is, if you don't know exact value any word, then this resource is perfect for you.

You just need to write the text you need in the field or click the “Random sentences” button, and then click the “Analyze” button, and then you will get detailed analysis each word in a sentence: explanation of the meaning of the word, part of speech.

What advantages does this site have over others? First of all, the service is very easy to use; you won’t need to spend a lot of time to understand what’s what.

Secondly, the site has a huge database that allows you to parse text of any complexity and topic.

In addition, the site has enormous functionality; it will be useful in many other ways for people who are studying English.

  • easy to use website;
  • There are practically no advertisements that would distract;
  • simple site interface;
  • huge functionality;
  • very good parsing.

Negative:

  • If you do not have a satisfactory level of knowledge of the English language, it will be a little difficult to read all the explanations on the site;
  • words during parsing are not underlined by parts of speech lines;
  • there is no adaptation of the site to the Russian language.

As you can see, the ratio of pros and cons allows us to call this site good, but not great, which is why it is in fifth place.

№4 Delph-in

In fourth place is a service called “Delph-in".

You can try it out using this link: http://erg.delph-in.net/logon. This site is a real monster for people who are learning English. This service allows you to have online access to LinGO English Resource Grammar (ERG).

The grammar development platform Linguistic Knowledge Builder is used here.

This interface allows you to enter a single sentence using the ERG system and visualize the results of the analysis in various forms.

I will say right away that the site is suitable for those who are quite experienced in the English language, but this site is simply magnificent and necessary for such people.

What advantages does this service have? First of all, this site has a better degree of analysis of the proposal according to the method that is used at the University of Oslo, and to be precise, the Language Technology Group.

The European sentence parsing system is used here. In addition to using this method, this site shows different ways sentence parsing, which makes parsing more flexible and convenient.

Now we will look at both the pros and cons of this service.

Positive:

  • very flexible sentence parsing system;
  • you can write proposals on a variety of topics;
  • an unlimited number of characters can be used in a sentence.

Negative:

  • the first of them is that the service is quite complex for people with low and intermediate levels of English to use;
  • To understand how the service works and disassemble it in order to understand what’s what, you need to devote several hours to the site.

We have familiarized ourselves with the fourth position and now we will move on to the third place of our TOP.

№3 MorphologyOnline

This site is ideal for those who need to qualitatively parse a sentence step by step, word by word, so as not to make mistakes and correctly select each part of speech for each word in the sentence being analyzed.

The service is also useful because it has a very broad description of each searched word.

What advantages does this service have? Let's look at them.

The first thing is that it is very easy to use. Its interface does not have any distracting elements, which will allow you to fully concentrate on the written information.

In addition to the fact that the service indicates the part of speech of a word, it also describes a morphological analysis, which makes the analysis of the word deeper and more thorough.

This will help you never make a mistake in parsing your sentence. Also, if you want to familiarize yourself with the parts of speech in detail, you can find information on this site, which is very conveniently and clearly explained.

Now let’s look at the service from both sides and see both the pros and cons. Let's start with positive side.

Positive:

  • very simple - even the youngest user can handle it;
  • there are no annoying advertisements, which makes using the service comfortable;
  • deep Scan;
  • great amount information for independent parsing of sentences.

Negative:

  • this service can only analyze one word at a time, which makes the whole process slow;
  • this site is more focused on morphological analysis words, but he also does syntactic analysis very well;
  • There are no other tools available, which makes the site narrow for use in different areas.

It is because of these pros and cons that the service takes only third place. Now it's time for second place.

No. 2 "Gramota.ru"

Why is this service in 4th place? This site allows you to analyze one word at a time across all Russian dictionaries, which not only indicate the part of speech, but also explain the meaning of the searched word, synonyms, antonyms, and various forms.

Here you can even find the correct stress for any Russian word.

In addition to this service for a complete analysis of the word, there is a lot of materials on learning the Russian language, for example: a wide variety of dictionaries, magazines, alphabet books, books, tutors, and various useful links.

Therefore, if you want to fully analyze a word or increase your level of knowledge of the Russian language, you can safely use this resource.

Let's take a closer look at the advantages of the site. First of all, there is a very nice interface, everything is clear, you don’t need to search for anything. Everything you need can be immediately seen on the monitor display. The site itself has no advertising.

The entire design of the site is made in simple colors, that is, your eyes will not get so tired from reading this site for a long time.

Absolutely anyone can use this service: from first class to the elderly.

Since I described all the possible advantages in great detail, you can now make a whole short list and also add negative sides to see the full picture.

Positive:

  • an easy-to-use site that won’t take up much of your time;
  • nice interface;
  • absence annoying advertising;
  • all kinds of materials for learning the Russian language.

Negative:

  • you can only analyze one word at a time;
  • the site is more geared towards general analysis words rather than for syntactic analysis.

We have reviewed and examined in detail the second place and now we will move on to the leader of our TOP.

№1 "Goldlit"

Why did this service take first place in our TOP? First of all, the site can parse a sentence, regardless of the number of characters and words.

The analysis on the site is very convenient. The service was created specifically for parsing sentences.

This site has a number of advantages. As mentioned, the site can analyze entire sentences, and not just words.

Syntactic analysis is carried out very conveniently: first you write initial forms words, then parts of speech, then comes grammatical analysis, and then declension by case.

Of all the TOP, this service has the most convenient and eye-pleasing interface.

In addition to these advantages, the site also has sections with various literature different periods, various poetry, both Russian and foreign. The site has information about many poets, many conveniently written biographies. All this will also help you study various literature if you need it.

But despite all these advantages, the site also has some disadvantages. We will talk about them after we have identified all the advantages.

Positive:

  • performs full analysis namely sentences, regardless of the topic, number of words and characters;
  • minimal amount advertising, but even this does not interfere with using the site;
  • very easy to learn;
  • a lot of information on the literature;
  • great interface and good colors.

Negative:

  • absolute lack of materials on the Russian language;
  • the site is geared more towards literature, but still has a tool for parsing sentences.

Bottom line

Let's summarize the results. After analyzing the entire TOP, you can understand that if you need a site for parsing sentences in Russian, I recommend you use the “Goldlit” resource.

Simplicity of the site, excellent analysis of the proposal, many interesting materials– these are the key factors that influenced the site’s placement in our top.

It is the absolute leader in our TOP and the best online service for parsing sentences in Russian on Russian Internet networks.

This is a resource that will help you not only complete homework, but also familiarize yourself with various literature. Use the Goldlit service.

Remember:

Sentence member

Indicates/shows

Answers the questions

Emphasizes

Subject

main members of the sentence

who or what the sentence is talking about

Who? What?

Predicate

names what an object does, its state, what it is

what is he doing? what did you do? what will it do? what?

Definition

minor members of the sentence

attribute of an object

Which? which? which? which? whose? whose?

Addition

what object or phenomenon is the action directed at?

whom? what? to whom? what? whom? What? by whom? how? about whom? about what?

Circumstance

how the action is performed, when the action is performed, where the action is performed, for what reason the action is performed, for what purpose the action is performed

Where? Where? When? where? Why? For what? And How?

Write out a proposal.

Do this : WITH high mountains let's run voiced streams.

1.Sentence basis:

the sentence talks about streams, hence, streams - this is the subject,

let's run, hence, let's run – this is a predicate.

2. The sentence has minor members.

I ask a question from the subject:

streams which?- voiced - this is the definition.

I ask a question from the predicate:

let's run where? – from the mountains - this is a circumstance of the place.

from the mountains which ones? – high - this is the definition.

39. Sentence parsing scheme (syntactic parsing).

I. Type of sentence according to the purpose of the statement.

II. Type of sentence by intonation.

III. The basis of the sentence (subject and predicate).

IV. Type of proposal for the presence of secondary members.

V. Secondary members of the sentence.

Write out a proposal.

Do this : WITH high mountains let's run voicedstreams. (Narrative, non-narrative, distributive)

This is an offer

I. Narrative.

II. Non-exclamatory.

III.Sentence basis:

the sentence talks about streams, hence, streams - this is the subject,

it is said about streams that they let's run, hence, let's run – this is a predicate.

IV. The sentence has minor members, which is why it is common.

V. I ask a question from the subject:

streams which?- voiced - this is the definition.

I ask a question from the predicate:

let's run where? – from the mountains - this is a circumstance of the place.

I ask a question from the secondary members of the proposal:

From the mountains which ones? – high - this is the definition.

Remember:

III. Punctuation

40. Punctuation marks at the end of sentences (.?!).

Write the sentence correctly. Come up with your own or find a sentence with the same sign in the textbook. Underline the punctuation.

Do this : Glory to our Motherland ! Glory to Labor !

41. Homogeneous members of a sentence.

Write out a proposal. Place the signs correctly. Underline the homogeneous parts of the sentence. Draw an outline of the proposal.

Do this : Rooks, starlings And larks flew away to warmer climes. (Oh, Oh and Oh)

Punctuation marks for homogeneous members:

Oh yeah (=and) Oh

Oh yes (= but) Oh

and O, and O, and O, and O

or oh, or oh, or oh, or oh

Oh and Oh and Oh and Oh

42.Complex sentence.

Write the sentence correctly. Emphasize grammatical basics. Draw diagrams.

Do this:

Dozing fish under the water, rests som gray-haired

[ ], [ ].

43.Sentences with direct speech.

Write the sentence correctly. Make a diagram.

Do this :

1) Oleg reassured his mother: “Everything will be fine.”

2) He shouted: “Forward, guys!”

3) He asked: “Where are you from, guy?”

4) “I won’t give you away,” Ivan promised.

5) "Fire!" – Tanya shouted.

6) "Who was it?" – Olya asked.

7) “I’m a doctor,” he said, “I’m on duty today.”

"P, - a, - p."

8) “Our presence is necessary,” Petrov finished. “We are leaving in the morning.”

"P, - a. - P."

9) “Why at five?” asked the brother. “It’s very early.”

"P? - ah. - P."

10) “Well, great!” Anya exclaimed. “Let’s go together.”

"P! - a. - P."

11) “He’s from our group,” said Ivan. “Sit down, Peter!”

"P, - a. - P!"

TO TEACHERS AND PARENTS

“Memo for working on errors in the Russian language” consists of three sections: “Spelling rules”, “Types of analysis”, “Punctuation”.

The first and third sections provide instructions on what operations and in what sequence students need to perform when working on errors. In order for the student to quickly and easily find the required spelling in the memo, each rule has its own serial number.

We propose to work according to the memo as follows. To the traditional markings of errors in the margins, add the number of the spelling letter placed in the memo. After checking the work, skip two lines and indicate these numbers on subsequent lines.

The student, having received the notebook, must work on mistakes strictly according to the instructions. The teacher checks and evaluates each work, taking into account the correctness and accuracy of the correction.

For example: there is a heavy drizzle outside - the student sees in the fields | No. 20. He opens the memo book and reads the algorithm:

No. 20 Moro h– Moro hs.

Thus, the main types of students’ independent work on errors are:

Self-correction (then you can offer to independently search) for errors;

Independently writing out words in which a mistake was made;

Selection of test words;

Repetition of rules.

Taking into account the need for continuity between the primary and secondary stages of education, when compiling the third section “Types of analysis” (morphemic, phonetic, morphological, syntactic), we relied on a textbook for the 5th grade of general education institutions, authors T.A. Ladyzhenskaya, M.T. Baranov, L.A. Trostentsova and others.

“Memo on how to work on errors in the Russian language” can be used in educational work for any elementary school program, both in group work and in individual, independent work of the student in the classroom or at home.

Literature

1. Russian language: 3rd grade: comments on lessons / S.V. Ivanov, M.I. Kuznetsova.- M.: Ventana-Graf, 2011.-464 p.- (Primary school of the XXI century).

2. Russian language: Theory: Textbook for grades 5-9. general education textbook establishments /V.V. Babaytseva, L.D. Chesnokova- M.: Education, 1994.-256 p.

3. Russian language: textbook for 5th grade. general education institutions / T.A. Ladyzhenskaya, M.T. Baranov, L.A. Trostentsova and others - M.: Education, 2007.-317 p.

4. Handbook for primary classes. A manual for students in grades 3-5, their parents and teachers. /T.V. Shklyarova - M.: "Gramotey", 2012, 128 p.

Syntactic analysis of a simple sentence has become firmly established in the practice of elementary and high school. This is the most difficult and volumetric view grammatical analysis. It includes the characteristics and outline of the sentence, analysis by members indicating parts of speech.

The structure and meaning of a simple sentence is studied starting from the 5th grade. The full set of features of a simple sentence is indicated in the 8th grade, and in the 9th grade the focus is on complex sentences.

In this type of analysis, the levels of morphology and syntax are correlated: the student must be able to identify parts of speech, recognize their forms, find conjunctions, understand how words are connected in a phrase, know the signs of the main and minor members of a sentence.

Let's start with the simplest thing: we will help the children prepare for parsing in 5th grade. In elementary school, the student remembers the sequence of parsing and performs it at an elementary level, indicating the grammatical basis, syntactic connections between words, the type of sentence according to the composition and purpose of the statement, learns to draw up diagrams and find homogeneous members.

In elementary schools, different Russian language programs are used, so the level of requirements and student preparation are different. In the fifth grade, I took in children who studied in elementary school according to programs educational system“School 2100”, “School of Russia” and “Primary School of the 21st Century”. There are also big differences. Primary school teachers do a tremendous job to compensate for the shortcomings of their textbooks, and they themselves “lay” continuity between primary and secondary schools.

In grade 5, the material on sentence analysis is generalized, expanded and built into a more complete form; in grades 6-7 it is improved taking into account newly learned morphological units (verb forms: participle and gerund; adverb and state category; function words: prepositions, conjunctions and particles ).

Let us show with examples the differences between the level of requirements in the parsing format.

In 4th grade

In 5th grade

IN simple sentence the grammatical basis is highlighted, familiar parts of speech are indicated above the words, homogeneous members are emphasized, phrases are written out, or syntactic connections between words are drawn. Scheme: [O -, O]. Declarative, non-exclamatory, simple, common, with homogeneous predicates.

Noun (main word) + adj.,

Ch. (main word) + noun.

Ch. (main word) + place.

Adverb + verb (main word)

Syntactic connections are not drawn, phrases are not written out, the scheme and basic notations are the same, but the characteristics are different: narrative, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, common, complicated by homogeneous predicates.

Analysis is constantly practiced in lessons and participates in grammatical tasks in control dictations.

In a complex sentence, the grammatical basics are emphasized, the parts are numbered, familiar parts of speech are signed over the words, the type is indicated according to the purpose of the statement and emotional coloring, according to the composition and presence of minor members. Parsing scheme: [O and O] 1, 2, and 3. Narrative, non-exclamatory, complex, widespread.

The scheme remains the same, but the characteristics are different: narrative, non-exclamatory, complex, consists of 3 parts that are connected by a non-union and allied communications, in part 1 there are homogeneous members, all parts are two-part and widespread.

Analysis of a complex sentence in grade 5 is for educational purposes and is not a means of control.

Sentence patterns with direct speech: A: “P!” or "P," - a. The concept of quotation is introduced, which coincides in design with direct speech.

The diagrams are supplemented by a break in direct speech with the words of the author: “P, - a. - P.” and "P, - a, - p". The concept of dialogue and ways of its design are introduced.

Schemes are drawn up, but sentences with direct speech are not characterized.


Plan for parsing a simple sentence

1. Determine the type of sentence according to the purpose of the statement (narrative, interrogative, incentive).

2. Find out the type of sentence by emotional coloring (non-exclamatory or exclamatory).

3. Find the grammatical basis of the sentence, underline it and indicate the methods of expression, indicate that the sentence is simple.

4. Determine the composition of the main members of the proposal (two-part or one-part).

5. Determine the presence of minor members (common or non-common).

6. Emphasize the minor members of the sentence, indicate the ways of their expression (parts of speech): from the composition of the subject and the composition of the predicate.

7. Determine the presence of missing members of the sentence (complete or incomplete).

8. Determine the presence of a complication (complicated or not complicated).

9. Write down the characteristics of the proposal.

10. Create an outline of the proposal.

For analysis, we used sentences from Sergei Kozlov’s wonderful fairy tales about the Hedgehog and the Little Bear.

1) It was an extraordinary autumn day!

2) Everyone’s duty is to work.

3) Thirty mosquitoes ran out into the clearing and began to play their squeaky violins.

4) He has neither a father, nor a mother, nor a Hedgehog, nor a Bear.

5) And Belka took some nuts and a cup and hurried after.

6) And they put things in a basket: mushrooms, honey, a teapot, cups - and went to the river.

7) Pine needles, fir cones, and even cobwebs - they all straightened up, smiled and began to sing with all their might the last autumn song of the grass.

8) The Hedgehog lay, covered up to his nose with a blanket, and looked at the Little Bear with quiet eyes.

9) The hedgehog sat on a hill under a pine tree and looked at the moonlit valley, flooded with fog.

10) Across the river, the forest was dark, blazing with aspens.

11) So until the evening they ran, jumped, jumped off the cliff and screamed at the top of their lungs, setting off the stillness and silence of the autumn forest.

12) And he jumped like a real kangaroo.

13) Water, where are you running?

14) Maybe he's gone crazy?

15) It seems to me that he imagined himself... as the wind.

Examples of parsing simple sentences