Spelling not with adjectives|#|
Are written together with Not adjectives, which without Not not used: careless, homely, hostile.
Are written together with Not adjectives, which in combination with Not take on the opposite meaning; Usually such words can be replaced by synonyms without Not: small (small), unmarried (idle). Not it is always possible to find a similar synonym, but the affirmative connotation of meaning contained in adjective, serves as the basis for the continuous writing: Someone not from here is sitting on a stone in the chapel; His youthful pranks... were determined by childish thoughtfulness.
Written separately from Notadjectives, if there is or is implied opposition: The problem is not simple, but complex; the relationship is not hostile; the light is not harsh.
Usually, Not written separately with relatives adjectives, giving negation to the attribute they express: the watch is not gold, the honey is not fake. From quality adjectives this includes adjectives, which indicate color and which, in combination with Not do not form words with opposite meanings: the paint is not blue, the binding is not yellow.
In this case, the syntactic function is taken into account adjective: the rule usually applies to adjectives in the role of a predicate, since the intended opposition gives the statement the character of a generally negative judgment expressed by a particle Not, but may not apply to adjectives as a definition: these people are not from here - to shine with unearthly beauty; paper is not white - non-white citizens.
In some cases, a double interpretation of the text is possible and, as a result, double spelling: this task is not difficult("lightness" is stated) - This task is not difficult("difficulty" is denied). Such nuances are especially important to consider when translating contracts and other serious documents.
The opposition expressed by the conjunction is different A, and opposition expressed by the conjunction But. In the first, one of the two opposing characteristics is denied, and the other is affirmed: the river is not deep, but shallow; with the second, there are no concepts that are opposite to each other, they are completely compatible, that is, two characteristics are simultaneously attributed to an object without denying one of them: the river is shallow but cold. In the first case Not written separately, in the second - together.
The presence of explanatory words, as a rule, does not affect continuous writing Not With adjectives : unknown author, facts unknown to science, words incomprehensible to the student, details unnecessary for the case; lake invisible behind the forest(everywhere a negative attribute is affirmed, and a positive one is not denied).
Separate writing Not With adjective, having explanatory words with it, occurs:
at adjectives, which in full and short form have different meaning, For example: actor not ready to go;
if there are negative pronouns and adverbs (starting with neither) or combinations : unknown address, innocent people, not at all harmful drink, far from an easy decision, not a new story at all, compare: in ways unknown to me - in ways unknown to anyone, But: Nothing is impossible in life! There is nothing illegal about what my neighbor is accused of. (negative pronoun nothing depends on adjectives, but itself is explained by them);
sometimes during production adjective With dependent words after a qualifying noun: enterprises not under their jurisdiction (in conditions of isolation, the construction with an adjective approaches the meaning of a participial phrase).
If the explanatory word is an adverb of measure and degree ( very, extremely, very, almost, adverbial expression to the highest degree and the like), then Not With adjective written together: a very ugly act, a very inappropriate attack, a very unsuccessful performance.
If there is an adverb as an explanatory word at all Both combined and separate writing is possible Not With adjectives, which is associated with two meanings in which the specified adverb is used: 1) “absolutely, very”, 2) “not at all”, “in no way”. In some cases, both interpretations and, as a result, both spellings are possible: Absolutely not great achievements
(small, modest) - not great achievements at all(not big at all).
The adverb also allows for double interpretation at all: 1) “not at all”, 2) “completely, completely” - in conversational style speeches: The arguments given were not at all convincing. - The authors of these works are less popular or completely unknown authors.
With brief adjectives negation is not written basically in the same way as with complete ones: together in the absence of opposition and separately in its presence: the room is low - the room is low; incomprehensible “survey - the question is incomprehensible. Compare spellings when there are different explanatory words: Searching for material on a chosen topic is easy for him; People are too uncertain about the future - No control is possible here anymore; They are not alike in any way. Compare also: This river is always restless. - This river is never calm.
Written separately from Not short adjectivesthat are not used in full form or have a different meaning in full form: not ready to leave, should not do this, does not intend to remain silent, is not obliged to help.
Depending on the meaning Not with short adjectives, as with full ones, it is written either together or separately: Our family is not rich(about the same as poor). - Our family is not rich(i.e. average income); This girl is ugly(a negative sign is affirmed) - This girl is not beautiful(a positive sign is denied). Compare also: It's not a big problem. - It would seem that this distance is not great for stayers. Separate writing in pairs is more common: not needed - unnecessary, wrong - wrong, disagree - disagree, incapable - incapable(usually in these cases the negation of a positive sign is felt more than the affirmation of a negative one).
Double spelling also occurs in combinations Not with comparative degree of adjectives: This screensaver is uglier than that one(more ugly) - This screensaver is not more beautiful than that one(does not have greater beauty).
It is written separately: not lower, not higher, not better, not worse, not closer, not poorer and the like (a common form of writing Not with comparative degree of adjectives).
Written separately Not with forms bigger, smaller, better, worse: with no less success, with not the best chances.
Spelling differs from verbal ones adjectives on -my and with participles -my: if there are explanatory words, the first ones are written together (as well as denominative adjectives), the second - separately: uninhabited island for a long time, water-insoluble crystals, magazines not read by non-specialists, a child not loved by the stepmother.
TO adjective on -my include words formed from intransitive verbs ( independent, waterproof, fireproof) or from perfective verbs ( incorrigible, indestructible). These words apply general rules writing Not With adjectives, that is, they are written together and with explanatory words, as well as in a short form ( the island is uninhabited, the disease is incurable, these countries are economically independent). However, the rule remains in force separate writing adjectives With Not, if pronouns and adverbs starting with neither, or combinations far from, not at all, not at all: an incomparable experience, not at all soluble crystals; cannot be eliminated from art. The exception is words that, without Not not used: an army invincible to anyone, a case incomprehensible to anyone.
It is necessary to distinguish between spelling Not with words on -my formed from transitive verbs imperfect form: such words can be either passive present participles or adjectives (in the first case, spelling with Not separate, in the second - merged). They are participles if the instrumental case is used as an explanatory word actor, less often a creative tool (the so-called instrumental); if there are other explanatory words, they become adjectives(lose the meaning of passivity and the meaning of time and acquire qualitative meaning). Compare: child not loved by stepmother - unloved games in childhood(in the second case the word unloved indicates a constant sign, means approximately the same as “unpleasant”, “undesirable”).
TO adjective This type includes: invisible, irresponsible, inflammable, inextinguishable, immovable, indivisible, unforgettable, unseen, unchangeable, unloved, inconceivable, untaxable, inalienable, untranslatable, incommunicable, unknowable, unverifiable, unconjugated, intolerant and others. Compare their spellings if there are explanatory words: a number indivisible by three, unforgettable meetings for us, indescribable in simple words feelings, inflexible nouns in Russian, behavior intolerant in our society and so on.
Written separately Not With adjective in an interrogative sentence, if the negation is logically emphasized: Isn't this situation clear without any evidence? Who doesn't know the names of our cosmonauts?
If the negation is not emphasized, then the continuous spelling is used: Is this position unclear? Is this statement incorrect? (replacement possible: Is this statement erroneous?)
Spelling particles not with adjectives
1. Written together with Not adjectives that are without Not are not used, for example: careless, nondescript, hostile.
2. They are written together with Not adjectives that are combined with Not take on the opposite meaning; Usually such words can be replaced by synonyms without Not. For example: small (cf.: small), unmarried (cf.: single), unreal (cf.: false, feigned).
Note. It is not always possible to find such a synonym, but the affirmative connotation of meaning contained in the adjective serves as the basis for continuous writing, for example: Someone not from here is sitting on a stone in the chapel (Zhukovsky); Gerwig had a kind of unmanly effeminacy (Herzen); His young pranks... were determined by childish thoughtfulness (Leonov).
3. Written separately from Not adjectives if there is or implies opposition, for example: the problem is not simple, but complex; the relationship is not hostile, the light is not harsh, the milk is not sour, the meat is not fresh, the look is not kind, the task is not urgent; Not many of those present supported the speaker (one thinks: ... but a few).
4. As a rule, Not is written separately with relative adjectives, giving a negation to the attribute they express, for example: the watch is not gold, the honey is not linden, the sky here is not southern. Of the qualitative adjectives, this includes adjectives that denote color and which, in combination with Not do not form words with the opposite meaning, for example: the paint is not blue, the binding is not yellow, the shade is not gray.
In this case, the syntactic function of the adjective is taken into account: the rule usually applies to adjectives in the role of a predicate, since the intended opposition gives the statement the character of a generally negative judgment expressed by a particle Not, but may not apply to adjectives as a definition. Wed: these people are not from here - to shine with unearthly beauty; paper is not white - non-white citizens (colored); logic is not feminine - the girl reasoned with unfeminine logic; the shape is not round - the bill is for a non-round amount of 119 rubles ( figurative meaning words).
Note. In some cases, double interpretation and, as a consequence, double spelling are possible; compare: this task is not difficult ("ease" is asserted) - this task is not difficult ("difficulty" is denied); in front of us unusual phenomenon(i.e. rare) - before us is not an ordinary phenomenon (we imagine a contrast: ... but exceptional, out of the ordinary). When written separately, the logical stress falls on the particle not. A broader context is needed when addressing such issues.
5. The opposition expressed by the conjunction is different A, and the opposition expressed by the conjunction But. In the first, one of the two opposite signs is denied, and the other is affirmed, for example: the river is not deep, but shallow; with the second, there are no concepts that are opposite to each other, they are completely compatible, i.e. two attributes are simultaneously attributed to an object without denying one of them, for example: the river is shallow, but cold. In the first case Not written separately, in the second - together.
6. The presence of explanatory words, as a rule, does not affect continuous writing Not with adjectives (cf.: writing Not with participles, §70, paragraph 2), for example: an author unfamiliar to us, facts unknown to science, a remark inappropriate in the given conditions, an error invisible at first glance, words incomprehensible to the student, details unnecessary for the case, conclusions incorrect in many respects; a case unlike others; behavior unworthy of a decent person; site unsuitable for construction; a lake invisible behind the forest (everywhere a negative sign is affirmed, and a positive one is not denied).
Note 1. Separate writing Not with an adjective that has explanatory words, it occurs:
- 1) for adjectives that have different meanings in their full and short forms (see paragraph 8 below), for example: an actor who is not ready to go out, a child who is not prone to colds;
- 2) if there are negative pronouns and adverbs (starting with neither) or combinations, for example: an unknown address, innocent people, an incomprehensible expression, a not at all harmful drink, a far from simple solution, not at all a fruitless search, not a new plot; cf.: in ways unknown to me - in ways unknown to anyone; but: Nothing is impossible in life; There is nothing illegal about what my neighbor is accused of (negative pronoun Nothing does not depend on adjectives, but is itself explained by them);
- 3) sometimes when placing an adjective with dependent words after the defined noun, for example: enterprises not subordinate to the trust (under conditions of isolation, the construction with the adjective approaches the meaning of the participial phrase); cf: the chess player played in a style unusual for him - traits not typical of our youth.
Note 2. If the explanatory word is an adverb of measure and degree (very, extremely, very, almost, adverbial expression to the highest degree, etc.), then Not written together with an adjective, for example: a very ugly act, an extremely inappropriate attack, a very unsuccessful performance, almost unfamiliar text, extremely illegible handwriting.
Note 3. If there is an adverb as an explanatory word at all Both combined and separate writing is possible Not with adjectives, which is associated with two meanings in which the specified adverb is used:
- 1) “completely, very”;
- 2) “not at all”, “in no way”;
cf.: a completely unnecessary meeting (completely unnecessary, superfluous) is not a random meeting at all (not at all random, the logical emphasis does not fall on it). In some cases, both interpretations and, as a result, both spellings are possible, for example: very small achievements (small, modest) - not at all great achievements (not at all large). In these cases, a broader context is not needed to resolve the issue of writing (see also note to paragraph 4). Continuous writing is typical for informative texts, separate writing is typical for polemical texts.
The adverb also allows for double interpretation at all:
- 1) “not at all”;
- 2) “absolutely, completely” - in a conversational style of speech;
cf.: Against revival, he spoke inconsistently, got confused, and gave not at all convincing arguments. - The authors of these works are less popular or completely unknown scientists. As is the case with completely, final decision depends on the nature of the text.
7. Negation with short adjectives Not it is written basically in the same way as with complete ones: together in the absence of opposition and separately in its presence, for example: the room is low - the room is low, an incomprehensible question - the question is incomprehensible, an invalid transaction - an invalid transaction in violation of the law; the novel is not interesting, but boring; The bay is shallow, but convenient for sailing on a motor boat.
Wed. writing in the presence of various explanatory words: Searching for materials on the chosen topic is not difficult for him; People were too unsure about the future; He is completely unfamiliar with latest achievements in the field of animal science. - No control is possible here anymore; They are not alike in any way. Wed. also: This river is always restless. - This river is never calm.
8. Written separately from Not short adjectives that are not used in full form or have a different meaning in full form, for example: not ready to leave, should not do this, does not intend to remain silent, is not obliged to help, is not happy to meet, is not inclined to believe, is not inclined to talk.
Note. Depending on the meaning Not with short adjectives, as with full ones, it is written either together or separately; compare: our family is not rich (about the same as poor) - our family is not rich (i.e. of average income); this girl is ugly (a negative attribute is affirmed) - this girl is not beautiful (a positive attribute is denied), the address is unknown ("unknown" is affirmed) - the address is unknown ("fame" is denied). Wed. See also: It's not a big problem. - It would seem that this distance is not great for stayers.
Separate writing in pairs is more common: not needed - unnecessary, wrong - wrong, disagree - disagree, unable - incapable (usually in these cases the negation of a positive attribute is felt more than the affirmation of a negative one).
9. Double spelling also occurs in combinations Not with the comparative degree of adjectives, for example: This screensaver is uglier than that one (more ugly). - This screensaver is not more beautiful than that one (does not have greater beauty); That night the patient's sleep was more restless than the previous one (it was even more restless). - That night the patient’s sleep was no more restful than the previous one (it was no more restful).
It is written separately: not lower, not higher, not better, not worse, not closer, not poorer, etc. (private form of writing Not with comparative degree of adjectives).
Written separately Not with the forms greater, lesser, better, worse, for example: with no less success, with not the best chances.
10. Spelling is different Not with verbal adjectives -my and with participles -my; if there are explanatory words, the first ones are written together (like denominate adjectives), the second ones are written separately, for example:
- a) an island uninhabited for a long time, crystals insoluble in water, figures of people indistinguishable in the dark;
- b) reserves not visited by hunters, magazines not read by non-specialists, a child not loved by the mother.
To adjectives on -my include words formed from intransitive verbs(for example: independent, waterproof, fireproof) or from perfective verbs (for example: incorrigible, impracticable, indestructible). These words are subject to the general rules of spelling not with adjectives, i.e. they are written together and with explanatory words (see examples above), as well as in a short form (for example: the island is uninhabited, the disease is incurable, these countries are economically independent). However, the rule of writing adjectives separately with Not, if explanatory words are pronouns and adverbs starting with neither, or combinations far from, not at all, not at all(see above, paragraph 6, note 1, subparagraph 2), for example: an incomparable impression, countries not dependent on anyone, not at all soluble crystals; This phenomenon cannot be eliminated either from life or from art. The exception is words that, without Not are not used, for example: an army invincible by anyone, an incomprehensible case for anyone, a unique experiment under no circumstances.
Note. It is necessary to distinguish between spelling Not with words on -my, formed from imperfective transitive verbs: such words can be either passive present participles or adjectives (in the first case, spelled with Not separate, in the second - merged). They are participles if the instrumental case of the character, or less often the instrumental case of the instrument (the so-called instrumental) is used as an explanatory word; in the presence of other explanatory words, they become adjectives (they lose the passive meaning and the meaning of time and acquire a qualitative meaning). Compare: a child not loved by the mother - unloved games in childhood (in the second case, the word unloved indicates a constant sign, means approximately the same as “unpleasant”, “undesirable”); movement not inhibited by air - the side of the Moon invisible from Earth.
Adjectives of this type include: invisible, irresponsible, inflammable, inextinguishable, immovable, indivisible, unforgettable, invisible, unchangeable, unloved, unthinkable, untaxed, inalienable, untranslatable, untransferable, unknowable, unverifiable, unconjugated, intolerant, etc. Cf. their writing in the presence of explanatory words: a number indivisible by three, unforgettable meetings for us, through tears invisible to the world, records unthinkable in the recent past, feelings inexpressible in simple words, accounts unverifiable for a long time, dirt impassable in the spring, indeclinable nouns in the Russian language , intolerant behavior in our society, etc.
11. Written separately Not with an adjective in an interrogative sentence, if the negation is logically emphasized, for example: Isn’t this position clear without any evidence? Who doesn't know the names of our cosmonauts?
Note. If the negation is not emphasized, then a continuous spelling is used, for example: Is this position unclear? Is this statement wrong? (replacement possible: Is this statement erroneous?)
The question of whether to write the particle “not” together or separately with adjectives is quite complicated: the choice of the correct option depends on many factors, and there are also exceptions. Here is systematized information for better mastering this spelling rule and applying knowledge in practice. We'll consider different variants We will give examples of combined and separate spelling of the particle “not” and adjectives.
Option "fused"The particle “not” and the adjective (full or short) are written together in these cases:
- if without “not” the word does not exist: nondescript (nondescript), careless (careless);
- if an adjective with “not” can be replaced with a synonym (without “not”): ugly (ugly) – ugly (ugly), unmarried - single.
Option “separately”
- There is a contrast. If in a sentence one adjective is contrasted with another and there is a conjunction “a”, the spelling of the adjective with “not” is separate. This applies to both long and short forms. Not sincere, and feigned. Not interesting, but boring.
This rule also applies when there is no explicit opposition, but it is implied. you are watching not ordinary phenomenon(that is, “not ordinary, but exceptional”).
Please note: there may be two interpretations. Compare two examples.
- This not complicated task(“...it’s simple”, that is, you don’t think the task is difficult).
- This uncomplicated task(you claim that the task is easy).
- Task not simple, but complex.
- Task not easy, but doable(“yes, the task is not simple, but despite this, it can be completed”).
- This not complicated task(“...it’s simple”, that is, you don’t think the task is difficult).
- There is a denial of any property or quality. Written separately with “not” relative adjectives(characterize a permanent property of an object). They can also be contrasted. For example: spoons not silver
(“...and steel”); honey not floral
(“...and fake”).
Separately with “not” we write and qualitative adjectives(characterize the quality of an object) if they indicate color. Unlike relative adjectives, qualitative adjectives in combination with the particle “not” denote the absence or insufficient manifestation of quality. For example: dye not white, shade not yellow . - There is an underlined statement. We will write “not” with an adjective separately if they express the underlined statement in an interrogative or simply emotionally charged sentence. Such a sentence can be mentally supplemented with an affirmative answer.
- Unclear is this without evidence?- Yes it is clear.
- To whom unknown the names of these heroes!- Yes, everyone knows them.
- Unclear is this without evidence?- Yes it is clear.
- “Not” is written separately with an adjective if the following are used as explanatory words:
- “far from it”;
- “not at all”;
- "not at all"
The exception is when the negative pronoun functions more like a noun, does not depend on the adjective, and the adjective itself explains this pronoun. I didn't do anything illegal. - “far from it”;
- If there are other explanatory words, “not” is written together with the adjective: inappropriate in this case the statement, incomprehensible words to me unsuitable play area etc. A negative sign is stated here: “the statement is not appropriate,” “I don’t understand the words,” “the site is not suitable for playing.”
Here we also include adjectives ending in “-my”, such as fireproof, waterproof, independent, indestructible, incorrigible and them short forms (waterproof, incorrigible etc.). They are also written together with “not” even if there are explanatory words. This country is economically independent. They bet unthinkable before records. - Special cases of combined spelling of the particle “not” and an adjective are when adverbs of measure (“to what extent?”, “how much?”) and adverbs of degree (“to what extent?”) are present nearby:
- "Very";
- "very";
- "extremely";
- "to the highest degree";
- "almost"
If we see the adverbs “at all”, “at all” as explanatory words, they can mean either “very”, “completely”, “absolutely” (and then we will choose the combined spelling “not” with the adjective), or “not at all” ( choose separate spelling). Compare:- It was completely unnecessary talk(statement: “yes, absolutely unnecessary”).
- It was not at all not random meeting(denial: “no, not at all random”).
- "Very";
If you see a combination of the particle “not” and an adjective in comparative degree, you need to pay attention to the meaning of the statement, as spelling variations are possible. Compare:
- This drawing uglier Togo(“more ugly than the other”).
- This drawing no prettier Togo(“is not more beautiful than the other”).
As you can see, there are quite a lot of nuances in the combined and separate spelling of the particle “not” with adjectives. But you can also notice that in some cases it is not necessary to remember a certain rule - rather, you need to reason logically to choose the right option.
In this article we will look at understandable and simple examples not used with adjectives. We'll show you when it's written seamlessly, and when apart.
In fact, there are very few ambiguous uses of non-adjectives.
First, remember the essence of the space between words. First of all, the space serves to separate words according to their meaning. If you understand this, then 90% success is guaranteed.
For example, there are adjectives that without?not? are not used and it is quite difficult to write them separately, even without knowing the rules. Adjectives such as ignorant, careless, insatiable are written a priori seamlessly.
In other cases, when an adjective can be read without it, its spelling together or separately depends on the context. That is, the meaning that is not carried with the adjective in the sentence.
If opposition or negation of properties is implied, then “not” is written separately. By opposition or negation it is meant that we want to say to draw attention to the fact that an object does not have some properties.
Here are a few examples of writing “not” separately with an adjective:
- Not strong, but weak.
- He's not funny at all.
- The water is not dirty. She is as pure as a tear!
- This animal is not at all scary.
- The bird was medium in size, neither big nor small.
In other cases, when we simply want to characterize an object without opposition or negation, it is not written together with an adjective.
Usually these are cases when a characteristic is formed that carries the opposite meaning.
For example, the combination “not big” can also be written together if it means small meaning small.
Here are some clear examples of continuous writing.
- The chicken laid three small eggs.
- This movie was not funny at all.
- The water is not dirty, you can swim!
Special indicators of the formation of adjectives merged with “not” are the so-called words amplifiers. These are adverbs: extremely, completely, very, almost and some others. When combined with adjectives, they enhance their meaning.
If we try to use a strengthened adjective with opposition, then the meaning
will get lost.
For example.
He bought not a big gift, but a small one.
Let's try to add amplification completely.
He bought not a big gift at all, but a small one.
As you can see, the word “at all” in one sentence does not fit with the opposition.
Summarize.
Writing not with an adjective depends on the meaning that needs to be conveyed.
If “not” and an adjective are used to say that an object does not have some specific property, then “not” and the adjective are written apart. And if we want to say that it has some property that can be formed by an adjective with “not”, then seamlessly.
By the way, on the website cerkovna-utvar.com, you can find a catalog of icons (http://cerkovna-utvar.com/informaciya-i-zametki/katalog-pravoslavnyx-ikon.html).
|
NOT with nouns, adjectives, adverbs |
|||
|
Rule |
Examples |
||
|
seamlessly |
1. If the word is without NOT not used |
N without booth n ate epy n ee inevitably |
|
|
2. Word with NOT can be replaced with a synonym |
N ep true (false) n ep sucker (good) n units aleko (close) |
||
|
3. With the following words: absolutely, very, very, almost, extremely, too, completely |
A very difficult task almost unfamiliar absolutely incorrect the merits are very small |
||
|
apart |
1. When contrasted with a union A(not BUT) |
Not truth, but lies, not bad, but good, not far but close |
|
|
2. At the following words: NOT at all, NOT at all, NOT at all, NOT at all, NOT to anyone |
not at all Truth, not far silly, not at all far, not at all difficult, not to anyone necessary |
||
|
3. When denying any quality, without affirming the opposite |
He is not stupid (but smart?) She is not far and not close |
||
|
4. Short adjectives, adverbs as predicates | |||
|
With short adjectives NOT written, as a rule, in the same way as with full ones |
Shore n ev high (the bank is not high) |
||
|
seamlessly |
with indefinite pronouns, as well as with negative pronouns without a preposition |
n EU so many articles, something new, nothing to help, no one to ask |
|
|
with negative adverbs |
n eg de, nowhere, no time, nowhere, no need |
||
Examples for spelling warm-up:
N e d spur, n e R yaha, n e V olnik, n e And sisterhood, n e n avis, n e With tolerant n e at Kluge, n e R sarcastically n e h ayanno. N e P true ( lie),n e P supporter ( enemy),n e d rug ( enemy),n e h health ( disease),n e P sucker ( good),n e V cheerful ( sad),n e at many ( silly);n e d aleko ( close),n e P loho ( satisfactorily),n e m slowly ( soon, immediately),n e P flamboyantly ( rough). This Not Truth, A lie. Needed here Not experience, A knowledge. This is completely Not success ( And what? ). Room Not big, A small. He's still Not old ( Which one then? ). He committed Not good, A bad deed. From school to home Not far, A close. This far Not the best way out. Not at all Not interesting book. This not at all Not complete data. Far Not modestly. To me not at all Not scary. To him not at all Not funny. Study never Not late.
Diagnostic set No. 10 Spelling not with nouns and adjectives.
|
Working part |
Control part |
|
|
Column No. 1 |
Column No. 2 | |
|
1 (not) acquaintance, but a stranger 2 prove (in)guilty 3 (un)clumsy expressions 4 far (not) beautiful 5 not at all dangerous disease 6 (not) friends 7 (im)nonsense 8 (not) large program 9 (not) knowledgeable 10 give (dis)trust |
1 (continuous) broadcast 2 this is (not) the wind 3 (un)reasonableness 4 (not) happiness, but trouble 5 (not) touchy 6 the night is not at all (not) dark 7 (ignorance) 8 (not) beautiful, but expensive 9 (bad) weather 10 reveal (in)combat capability | |
|
Column No. 3 |
Column No. 4 | |
|
1 far (not) smart 2 (not) enough 3 (un)known device 4 (not) friend, but enemy 5 speech (not) interesting 6 grave (un)happiness 7 (in)experience leads to trouble 8 (in)accessible rock 9 (un)acquaintance Book 10 consoles in (un)happiness |
1 (un)needed meeting 2 (in)dependent character 3 suggests good luck and (bad) luck 4th house (not) new and (not) old 5 (in)dependence of the Motherland 6 (ir)reconcilable differences 7 the grass is (not) tall 8 (non)wine activities 9 made noise by (bad) weather 10 (not) friend blew up bridges | |
Exercise No. 1. Form all possible parts of speech from these nouns.
|
Nouns |
Adjectives |
Adverbs |
|
hatred |
hated |
hateful |
|
continuity | ||
|
clumsiness | ||
|
negligence | ||
|
absurdity | ||
|
inattention | ||
|
necessity | ||
|
surprise | ||
|
absurdity | ||
|
indignation | ||
|
incredulity | ||
|
independence | ||
|
indecisiveness |
Exercise No. 2. Using a prefix, form NOT words with opposite meanings.
|
nouns |
adjectives |
adverbs |
|
understanding - |
cultural - | |
|
equality - |
decisive - | |
|
health - |
good - |
seriously - |
|
accuracy |
familiar - | |
|
loyalty - |
energetic - |
slowly - |
|
maturity - |
movably - |
|
|
addiction |
nice - | |
|
confidence - |
Also on topic
|